"Our Western partners", and now sponsored by them, numerous and noisy non-brothers, treat history in an extremely practical and utilitarian manner. They have always treated her that way - anything that can bring benefits now or in the future is good. Everything else is an incomprehensible unnecessary substance and chatter to induce panic.

Even today they actively confirm this with all their actions, quickly reshaping the still well-known events, as a result of which both the "Soviet occupation" and the "historical guilt of the Russian people", which are so well suited for persistent requests to "gild handle "" free and independent "on the whole little head of the neighbors of the Russian Federation on the globe.

To the indignant protests of those who are still in their right mind and firm memory, the "partners" and "non-brothers" shrug their shoulders: "Nothing personal, just business!" An easy manipulation of the history of the 20th century has turned for the tiny Baltics into almost a trillion in potential income in the form of compensations for Russia's "historical debts", which the Balts hope to monetize by waiting for more pliant inhabitants of the Moscow Kremlin, because the compliant professional historians of the Russian Federation, who are confident that that the Russians occupied and offended the Young Europeans, there is already enough in abundance.

Velikoukry and a whole family of "Genghis Khan's relatives" from Central Asia... When it comes to compensation, it’s a dark matter, but professional historians from these countries (and what is most indecent - to these countries) are already receiving grants, salaries and easy business trips, dividends are dripping.

My dislike for professional historians began with the recent history of Latvia, when these egg-headed doctors and candidates of historical sciences in the rank of professors and academicians, existing on my taxes, confidently and persistently chanted that

1. The USSR occupied the Baltics and Eastern Europe and exploited them with special cynicism almost until the very end of the twentieth century.
2. Russians carry the burden of historical guilt before ALL the peoples of Europe and the former socialist camp,
3. All of the above is a scientifically proven historical fact, to dispute which is a mortal sin.

Then I had the first questions, after which the representatives of the historical scientific school traditionally anathematized me:

1. Why did the "occupiers" in Russia itself live worse than those "occupied" by them?
2. Why in best universities The "occupation" metropolis had a reservation for the occupied national cadres, and in the localities there was a special program for their promotion to leaders, but for the "occupiers" nothing of the kind was observed even in theory?

The stream of "scientifically grounded" facts that are known to "all civilized humanity" is growing and expanding, and today represents a full-flowing river of "historically indisputable" events, among which, where is the "occupation" The Soviet Union The Baltics in 1940 and the whole of Eastern Europe in 1945, carefully supplemented by the "aggression" of Russia against Georgia in 2008 against Ukraine in 2014, and just the other day, the alleged aggression against Poland and the Baltic states ...

As more and more new "scientifically proven" historical references about the "natural aggressiveness", "historical incapacity" and "genetic inferiority" of Russians, there were more and more questions to professional historians, and their answers became more and more standard, predictable and painfully reminiscent of ukrov's answers to doubts about their theory of the Black Sea ...

After almost every question addressed to professional historians, they so persistently called me an adherent of Fomenko-Nosovsky that I decided to get to know the academician's works better.

I do not have sufficient qualifications to evaluate mathematical calculations, refute, or vice versa, agree with the reconstruction of historical events, but on the other hand I am able to guess what historical events, or what interpretation of historical events can be used for the benefit of today, like that “fool, and blunt scissors, which can come in handy if you only know how to use them "(Kozma Prutkov)

So, let's estimate what of the postulates of Academician Fomenko can be used for peaceful purposes, or rather, on the fronts of information battles of the 21st century?

1. First of all - the postulate that Russians and Tatars never fought with each other, but quite the opposite - together they bent "all civilized humanity" under the common brand "Horde" and "Tartaria". In the light of the constant attempts of “our Western partners” to pedal interethnic conflicts within Russia, this is a very relevant postulate, knocking stools out of the ass of those who like to speculate on who is better or worse than an uninvited guest.

2. The same bast, which is in line, will be the statement that Russia and Turkey were a union state and the destruction of this union was a matter of life and death for the Anglo-Saxons. In the light of this version, any actions and even words of "our Western partners" in the Mediterranean can be viewed as revenge and as a historical phobia at the same time.

3. Prussia, like P-Russia, is also quite suitable for additional justification why Kaliningrad is a Russian territory ...

4. Well, for dessert - the Romanovs, deified today, whose distant relatives are being wooed so hard today to the Russian throne ... According to Fomenko, the Romanovs are the occupation administration of “our Western partners” - a sort of collective Gorbachev-Yeltsin. With such an image, the present regalism, turning into regalism, will have some problems with recruiting broad masses of the people into its supporters.

I confess, I read Fomenko diagonally, so I could have missed a lot from what could still be used, but these selected postulates may well be used as working ones. I propose to consider the historical versions and alternatives in the future from the point of view of their usefulness and applicability. Well, what to do if history is an applied science, which only does what is applied to current politics and economics.

Instead of an afterword:

“I remember a case when a famous Japanese historian died 5 years ago, now I don’t remember his last name, who on his deathbed admitted that during excavations he planted false artifacts, that is, forgeries, in order to deepen the history of Japan. That is, their historians are ready to go to the point of artificially creating the antiquity of their history, and we do not need to artificially create anything. If we take up this goal and intensify the excavations on the territory of the same Russia, I think the greatest discoveries await us. "Roman PERIN, (http://www.koob.ru/perin/)

Recently, a lot of facts began to surface that indicate that the history of our earthly civilization has been distorted much more than Nosovsky and Fomenko write about this in their works. Their method is that they question the dates, the names of historical characters and the names of certain objects that different peoples really could be called differently, but at the same time they do not question the events themselves described in a particular document ... Since a certain event is described, it means, Nosovsky and Fomenko believe, that it really happened, it is only necessary to correctly determine the date and place of this event in one way or another, as well as those people about whom we are actually talking. At the same time, we must give them their due, they have done a tremendous job of analyzing and systematizing a very large amount of information, various documents and facts. And all the same, a lot of questions remain to the version that they formed. Including because it does not explain all the facts that we observe.

For example, their theory does not in any way observe the paradoxes that are observed in St. we don’t know. The "New Chronology" does not explain the ubiquitous backfilling of buildings and structures, which many authors write about, including myself in the fifth part.

While discussing the previous excerpts, readers sent in a link to a very interesting 1575 world map drawn by the Frenchman Francois De Belleforest. If you look closely at this map, you will discover a lot of interesting things that do not fit into either the official history or the New Chronology.

Managed to find this card in enough high definition, which, unfortunately, is not possible for all old maps to which I was sent links. The full-size version, on which all the signatures are perfectly readable, opens by clicking the link with the image.

What is interesting on this map is that the largest or most important cities are depicted and labeled. At the same time, many cities are depicted in Africa. We can also observe rivers there that do not exist on today's map.

While working on a series of articles about Tartaria, I looked through many old cards, and they all have one feature. On them, the authors may completely incorrectly depict the shape and position of rivers, lakes and seas, islands and continents, but at the same time, the topology of objects is almost always correctly depicted, that is, their interconnections. There are practically no mistakes in which river the main cities are on, which river flows into which other river, lake or sea, which seas with which other seas or oceans are connected by straits. This is explained quite simply. They did not know how to accurately measure distances and fix the shape of objects, but here are the straits through which you can sail to certain countries, or which rivers you need to sail to get to this or that city, was very well known from many travelers and merchants.

In addition, a similar configuration of rivers in North Africa, where the Sahara Desert should actually be located, is observed on other maps up to the first half of the 18th century. And only after this moment at this point they begin to designate "Grand Desert Sahara", that is, the great Sahara desert. It turns out that in the middle of the 16th century there was no Sahara in Africa yet?

It is also interesting that if the names of cities in Europe, the Middle East, India and northern Africa more or less correspond to what we know, then in the same Siberia or on the territory of present-day China there is nothing even close! Moreover, there are surprisingly many cities in Siberia, including those clearly beyond the Arctic Circle: Taingim, Naiman, Turfon, Coβin, Calami, Obea. Do these names tell you anything?
With territory modern China it is also unclear what. Most of the cities are clearly not Chinese. And where has Beijing (Běijīng) gone ?! But it is believed that Beijing is believed to be the largest city in the world in the periods from 1425 to 1650 and from 1710 to 1825. But we see on the map in this place many cities, but not the most Big City planets. Or the Chinese have not yet been resettled to our Earth and this happened after 1575?

During the discussion of this map, it was suggested that the author could not draw non-existent cities "to make it beautiful." But if you look at the same North America, the author will not invent anything there. There are no cities, so we don't depict anything. And in Europe, he did not come up with anything. Although, there are oddities there. It is very interesting which cities for the author seemed significant in Europe and on the territory of Russia. In Europe, marked: Lisbona (Lisbon), Sevilla, Lion, Brest, Paris, Ausburg, Wien, Danzic, Cracow, Buda, Ragura (?), Bergen, plus Constantinople is clearly not clearly marked. But a little to the right and below it we see Troy (Troia) !!! That is, in the second half of the 16th century, its location was not only well known, but the city itself still existed. And the official version of the story claims that Troy disappeared before our era. By the way, where is Rome? Or was there not enough space on the Iberian Peninsula for a badge and an inscription?

Could the confluence of the realities of different Earths explain that in different "parts of the world" continents and cities were located at different points or were absent altogether?

Moscow, Vyshegrad, Novgorod, Solovki (!!!), and a certain S. Nicolas - Saint Nicholas (?) Are designated on the territory of Russia.

Frankly speaking, not a lot. Or is it only the administrative centers of the territories are designated? If so, then what is the population density in North Africa and Siberia, if there are so many administrative centers?

It is also interesting which European states, according to the author, were worthy of being displayed on the map: England, Spain, Gaul, Germany, Greece, Italy, Russia, Sweden and Norway. Yeah, somehow not a lot. Tartary, by the way, is marked, although the border is shown in such a way that almost all of the lower and middle regions fall there. And the total area, which the author attributed to Tartary, is relatively small.

At the same time, it is interesting that France itself, according to the author of the map, who is allegedly French, is called Gaul, as in the days of the Roman Empire. But Rome is absent. Well, okay, with everything else, for example, the author could have lied, but what is his country called, which, according to the official myth, by the time of the reign of Louis XI (1461-1483), had actually done away with feudal fragmentation and turned into an absolute monarchy, he should have known? At the same time, it cannot be said that this map was made by a complete ignoramus, since many things are displayed and indicated completely correctly. And it seems to me that this Frenchman (or Gallican?) Can be trusted more than the official historical myth. If so, then in 1575 the catastrophe that led to the formation of the Sahara Desert has not yet occurred. There are still cities and rivers that disappeared after the disaster.

But, let's put aside the old cards, because the more you study them, the more questions arise, so we will return to this topic a little later, outside the cycle of articles about the death of Tartary.

After the publication of the links to the Apocalypse, I received one very interesting comment:

"About the destroyed print runs
just in case - I'm not a religious person, for me the Bible is not an object of worship, but a monument of history and culture.
grandmother said that as a child she heard an alternative version of the "Apocalypse", which she was read from some old Bible. what she remembered and what I remembered in her retelling)
"and the Earth will be entangled in a steel web, and steel birds will fly in the sky ... all the ravines and gullies will plow, but they will not fill their fill." Well, according to that "Apocalypse" all this will be in the last days, after which everything will be really bad.

I tried to investigate this issue and found out that many people mention a similar text (in the retelling) (geography - from Arkhangelsk to the Urals), which is an argument for me - they obviously did not know my grandmother, which means that somewhere objectively there was such a source ... By the way, according to memoirs, the last time I saw the book itself was with my relative and leafed through by a teenager in the 50s of the last century.
in total - there was some alternative version of the Bible, it was published in a large circulation - it seems that it was in almost every village, once and a hundred years later the descendants of the inhabitants of those villages remember about it. it is logical to assume that the information came in at least some form due to the massive nature of the source. Well, I remembered thanks to many coincidences of predictions with the realities of modern times.
I would be much safer to know that there is a preserved copy of that Bible in some library. but something suggests that there is no longer anything where it is easy to find. " http://mylnikovdm.livejournal.com/6658.html?thread=407810#t407810

Another interesting comment on the kramola.info website:

"The landing ... The landing killed me ... How many troops are needed to cover such an area?" 1.5 million square kilometers of the affected lands alone, another 7 million square kilometers of the immediate vicinity, not to mention the distant ones. Millions of pieces of equipment? The carrier is individually protected, armed biological objects, because we are talking about a total cleanup. On the other hand, it’s not at the same time everywhere ... The resources that were transferred to the planet and involved in such a mission are difficult to imagine, they are so quantitatively and energy-intensive. The end must justify the means. And secondly, where is the beneficiary? In whose interests was all this carried out? Hmm ... "

In this particular place, I personally do not see any serious problems, since the Apocalypse literally says the following about this:
"5. And given to her do not kill them, but only torment them for five months; and the torment from her is like the torment from a scorpion, when will sting a person.
(Revelation of John the Divine 9: 5) "
In terms of its effect, it is more like the use of some kind of chemical or bacteriological weapon, which was sprayed from the air. And taking into account the time of five months, this could be done with a relatively small number of devices.

But the next fragment, which some readers have also pointed out, is, to be honest, puzzling me so far.
"15. And the four Angels were set free, prepared for an hour and a day, and a month and a year, in order to kill a third of the people.
16. The number of the cavalry army was two darkness; and I heard his number.
(Revelation of John the Divine 9: 15,16) "

The old Russian numeral "darkness" means ten thousand. Based on this, in this fragment we are talking about the number of troops in 200 million units. This number is too much, even for today. And even more so for more ancient times. Bringing so many troops through space is also not an easy task. Unless a small planetoid of the Moon type was used instead of a ship, but this means colossal energy costs. But then, as it was rightly noted in the comments, why such costs? What then is the real goal of the invaders. That is, there is either an obvious exaggeration of the narrator, or we do not quite understand something about what is happening.

And finally, the answer to the last comment before I reach the home stretch.

Several people have already expressed themselves in this spirit: "Listen, besides the old European maps, is there at least one proof of the existence of Tartary?"

In fact, for me personally, it does not matter what the name of this state destroyed at the beginning of the 19th century, Tartary or something else was called. But from the facts that have already been collected in quantity, I see that in the 18th century the Romanov-Oldenburg dynasty, with the support of the European ruling dynasties, began to seize the territories of the Orthodox state. And this seizure began with the establishment of control over St. Petersburg. An attempt was made to seize Moscow in 1773-1775, which we know as "the uprising of the peasants led by Yemelyan Pugachev" but it ended unsuccessfully, although the official Romanov version of history assures us otherwise. That is why it took the second war of 1810-1815, for which the Romanovs-Oldenburgs carefully prepared for many years, including building many canals and erecting three river systems for the passage of ships in order to provide themselves with the logistics of offensive military operations to Moscow and other cities not yet captured. In 1812 Smolensk and Moscow were captured, in 1815 Kazan. These are the cities for which I have already checked the facts.

And in April 1815, a large-scale planetary catastrophe took place in Western Siberia, organized by the "masters" who are faithfully served by the Western ruling elite. This catastrophe destroyed those people who lived in this area at that time. Approximately in the same years, in the region of 1810-1815, a cleanup of the Ural Mountains with the use of nuclear weapons was also carried out. All this together leads to the fact that the Romanovs-Oldeburgs get the opportunity, with minimal losses, to quickly annex these territories to their newly formed Empire. The economic, transport and military infrastructure that existed on the territory of Western Siberia has been largely destroyed, great amount people died, the rest are disorganized and are on the brink of survival. That is, there is simply no one physically to offer large-scale resistance to the new authorities. By the way, I do not exclude that the old state could also be called the Russian Empire, and the Romanovs-Oldenburgs simply took this name into their hands to make it easier to falsify documents.

Somewhere in the 20-30s of the 19th century, the process of replacing true Orthodoxy with its surrogate begins, which partially uses the external attributes of Orthodoxy, but in its essence and ideology is Judeo-Christianity, a religion for slaves. This explains the fact that the already published editions of the New Testament and the Psalms are destroyed, and the distribution of their old versions is prohibited. Instead, a new, thoroughly revised version is issued, which today is known as the "Synodal Translation".

It is also interesting that Metropolitan Filaret of Moscow and Kolomna was in charge of the translation. And according to the official historical myth, the first serious reform of Orthodoxy was also started by the Metropolitan of Moscow Filaret, who was allegedly Fyodor Nikitich Romanov, the father of the allegedly first tsar from the Romanov dynasty - Mikhail. Having seen enough of how these guys work, I no longer believe in the coincidence of such coincidences.

And in general, if we talk about the Romanovs, then this is not a dynasty, but in general it is not clear what. The genetic link between the first generation and the last Romanov is absent in principle, while it was interrupted and changed to another at least three times. Everything is fine there only on paper, but in fact there are continuous murders and coups d'état.

This is really a real miracle. On this topic, I also have some thoughts, but this is already in another article.

Many people ask the following question. You’ve described everything so well, and even sort of convinced that invaders so cool and powerful really exist. So what to do? Where to run, how to escape, and is it possible to somehow cope with them?

This will be the last question, the answer to which I want to put an end to in this series of articles about the death of the Great Russian State in Siberia, which will still revive again.

I also noticed a few strange things in the behavior of the invaders. First, the fact that they are hiding does not only mean that they are trying to mislead the people of the Earth. Judging by the old myths of different peoples, they did not do this before. Based on this, I came to the conclusion that they have someone to be afraid of besides us, it is for this reason that they on Earth are trying to arrange everything as if we ourselves are making this whole mess.

Secondly, in the last two hundred years, there has been an explosive growth of technogenic science and the development of technologies based on it. Moreover, we are beginning to discover and allow us to use and develop quite serious things, such as atomic weapons, electronics or modern weapons.

As a result, I got a strong impression that these "gentlemen" are building here, on Earth, the production base they need. And they can do this only for two reasons. Either their original world was destroyed, so it is necessary to more thoroughly settle in the new one, or their detachment that controlled the solar system was blocked here by the rescue forces that had approached from the other brotherly worlds, and they were forced to accumulate forces to break the blockade.

The last option is also indicated by the fact that directly the individuals of the alien race themselves, as far as I could find out, are quite small. In addition, it is quite obvious to me that mankind invented most of the open source and technologies on its own, albeit with suggestive clues. On this occasion, I and several other readers who sent their comments and letters, independently came to the conclusion that the original language of the alien race is Latin.

Some researchers consider it a dead or artificially created language, since there are many oddities in its origin and spread. But the fact that in the so-called "black magic" all spells are recited in Latin, in the Catholic Church the service is conducted in Latin, and almost all the first scientific books on mathematics, physics, chemistry and medicine were written exclusively in Latin, and Latin itself was compulsory for study in all old universities, indicate the fact that this is the language of the technogenic civilization that captured us, in which they transmitted the knowledge they had (although not all), and that is why it is used to communicate with them during church rituals (public regime) or during magical rituals (closed, secret regime).

The fact that the third force is already here, and that it is playing on our side, I personally had no doubts after February 15, 2013, when in the sky over Chelyabinsk an alien ship shot down a stone block, which the invaders launched to demonstrate their capabilities ... If that meteorite had not been shot down and flew to the point where it was directed, this entire series of articles simply would not have happened.

The fact that he was shot down was reported even on the central channels. Those who wish to see this can watch the video on the links below.

In a very long discussion with the propagandist of the New Chronology, with the digging of sources, diving into web archives, etc., , finally, the time and circumstances of the appearance of Tartary in the runet were clarified. A product of the Internet era, now purposefully thrown into everyone and everywhere.

Prior to that, he believed that he had discovered Tartaria - the "empire of the Rus", etc. Levashov in 2004. Rare mentions of the pre-Internet era, occasionally encountered, are just a translation of the word "Tataria". Which has never been hidden by the publishers. These are, for example, pages of one book with parallel translation. this book. Scroll through and read about the journey to the horde to the Tatars. And about some "Tartaria" until the 21st century, nobody knew))

But in a dispute with the propagandist of Fomenko's works, Fomenko had to recognize the priority of Fomenko and make the history of Tartary 4 years old. Truth is dearer, thanks to him! The outcome of the dispute resulted in two extensive comments, which I am presenting in the form of a post.

*

In the program work "Fomenko A.T., Nosovskiy G.V. - New chronology and concept ancient history Russia, England and Rome ", uploaded in 2005, full, not an evaluation version - http://e-puzzle.ru/page.php?id=2025 , there is not a single mention of Tartary in any case (the search was conducted in the word document for the query "tartari"). If then she appears in the middle of "Russia-Horde", like a devil from a snuff-box, then this can only be a throw-in, a command execution, nothing more.
In addition, even if I present a photograph and a scan of a paper source, you will still stand to death and troll until you turn blue. Showing an absolutely clear example of Merezhkovsky's "Tartaria" in the traditional and well-known meaning of "hell, underworld", as prescribed by the author, has already confirmed this.

In general, they themselves asked for it.

The web archive has preserved the old site of the "New Chronology" with links.
They have a programmatic work "Empire". But not the very first option, which has stood since the opening of the site in 1997, but this version - https://web.archive.org/web/20060114051343/http://www.univer.omsk.su/foreign/fom/fomr.htm.

And there really was the word "Tartary" in it. But it would be better if it weren’t found - for you, Tartar agitprop, it’s better))

This is what is called - the classic stuffing!
The author put what was ordered in the title, did not change anything in the text. And it turned out that the title in this text is about "Tartary", and the whole chapter (and the book!) - only about Tatarstan and nothing else))) The word "Tartary" is used 45 times.

And that's not all, fighters.

Not being an idiot, Academician Fomenko knows very well that on European maps "Tartaria" could only be a translation of the Russian "Tataria", and nothing more.

Knows, and speaks directly about it.

Still, the title of academician is not a horse-radish, it presupposes the presence of some intelligence. I do not even exclude that A.T. I made such a trick on purpose - I put "Tartary" in the title and did not touch anything in the text about Tartary. Thus, making it clear to those who understand: that the requirement, desire, tseu to insert "Tartary" is an imposed nonsense, and not his will.

Subsequently, of course, the schizo situation was corrected. For example, in this "Empire" http://bookscafe.net/book/fomenko_anatoliy-imperiya_i-81816.html in the introductory fragment long before the chapter about "Tartary" there are 8 mentions of this word. Other fragments and full versions did not look for it.

Once again, thanks to the Tartar agitprop for help in establishing indisputable evidence of an unauthorized injection of "Tartaria" into the book of Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko!

*
In principle, before the lantern, Fomenko or Levashov was the first to launch Tartary in the meaning of "the empire of the Rus" and "hidden history", it is in any case a product of the Internet era. Let the Fomenkovites and the Levashovites fight each other for hair, I still didn't have enough to kill myself for this and that with the propagandists of Tartary ...

I am much more interested in the base that the workshop, Fomenko-Nosovsky and Levashovites brought under their Tartary. There are no Tartar artifacts - that's understandable. A million artifacts of the Russian Empire there and then, where and when the Tartarists have their Tartary - this is also understandable, here none of the Tartarists even scratched themselves to come up with something. All Tartary stands exclusively on electronic versions of "certificates" - tons of "maps of Tartary" and a kilogram of pictures with quotes.

It would be very interesting to consider the maps here. They were all done with the left foot, the artel of the generation of the USE victims, with insane mistakes, unthinkable for real cartographers, and the Levashovites and the Fomenkovites have the same cards.

For seven years, on the main page of the site, they defiantly kept a link to the programmatic work in an insane form, where "Tartaria" is mentioned twice in the title and once under the map, and in the texts there is only Tartary, 45 times, plus the author's explanation that tartaria is a translation of Tartary. What for?

Let's move on to the third mention of Tataria in the work - in the caption to the map.

The original of the card. Clickable.

The map was not allegedly made in 1700 in Amsterdam, as they write by the Finnish Finance Ministry, but was allegedly made in 1700 in Paris.
She's in French.
And strictly speaking, 1700 is not yet the 18th century, but the 17th.
And the Royal Academy of Sciences in Amsterdam appeared a century later, under Napoleon, as an institute, it became the Academy a century and a half later, in 1851.

Why do Fomenko and Nosovsky need demonstrative lies? Only then, in order to inform those who understand: guys, this forgery is Tartary, we are unpleasant, but nothing can be done about it, we had to do it under the hood.

My favorite is the jambs of the card.

The card, like all tartar ones, is a collection of wild mistakes and jambs unthinkable for real cards.

Nowhere and never was the Dnieper called Nieper, but only Dnieper, and nothing else. Forgot the letter, boobies. This joint appeared in one of the first "Tartarian cards" and wanders around them. Because for each next "Tartaria" blanks from the previous ones are used.

Ochakov received this name in 1792.

Where does NE come from? What is this locality, country, river?
Only from one source - from a blank, which a Tartarian cartographer from the artel of the victims of the exam used to draw a "map of Tartary". I forgot to erase part of the name that had to be deleted to include this very Petite Tartarie. It happens...

Tobol, Tobol is a river, oboldui. And the city is Tobolsk, and it has always been. Any cartographer of Europe of the stated time should know Tobolsk, because it was the main Russian city beyond the Urals.

Permie or Perme? Different spelling of the same name is very typical for the Tartarian draftsmen's artel. It happens because when drawing Tartarian cards, different cards are used - blanks.

Pechora on the left, Yugra on the right, Tartarian hack-workers! They different sides from the Urals, Pechora in Europe, Ugra in Asia.

Decide on Novgorod somehow. You have to write one thing: either Novogorod, or Nouogorod.

Why is Archangel - Arkhangelsk written through Russian P? It's a French card, boobies!

Tartar trolls. Compare the spelling of r with the letter in the name of Arkhangelsk - and you will see that there is exactly the Russian r.

Krasnoyarsk tartars write traditionally incorrectly. It was Krasnoy Yar until 1700, at the time of the alleged compilation of the map by the Paris / Amsterdam Academy it was Krasnoyarsk, and nothing else. But one of the first draftsmen got the name - not Krasny Yar or Krasnoyarsk, but something in between. Since then, the tartarists have been drawing a name that never existed.

What idiot drove the Anadyr prison to Yakutia ?? It is generally on the Anadyr River of the Pacific Ocean basin, not the Arctic Ocean.

This is what always touched in the work of the unfinished victims of the Unified State Exam - the draftsmen of the maps of Tartary.
One root of the toponym "Moscow" is written: kow, and right there next to it: cov.
And on one map, European Turkey is europe, and European Muscovy is europeane. You have to choose one thing, ass-headed ones.
The reason for the jamb, as always, is the same. On the blank map there was European Turkey and Moscow, they finished drawing the European Muscovy, but they did not have enough brains to see how the words "European" and "Moscow" are written on the blank, and draw the same way.
They have no time to think. The shaft must be driven. A very large order!

*
Mind and health!

Now many bloggers collect donations. Until now, I have abstained, but I have to apply. Whoever thinks that this work deserves some kind of payment - I would be grateful. Sberbank card 4276020014219544. Yandex-wallet 410013946572302.

With this material we open a new series of articles by the writer and publicist Yegor Kholmogorov

Ch.I... New chronology of the "New Chronology"

In Internet discussions, there is the well-known "Godwin's Law" - as the discussion grows, the likelihood of using the "you are Hitler" argument tends to unity. I think it's time to introduce a similar "Law of Fomenkization of Discussions" in Runet.

It is formulated as follows: "As the Internet discussion, which uses historical arguments, grows, the likelihood of a commentator appearing with statements" All chronology is wrong, all manuscripts are fake, all chronicles are fake, proved by scientists, not liars by historians, but real, mathematicians "tends to unit ".

Most often, the law is implemented immediately at the beginning of the discussion. Like Voldemort in his own name, the Fomenkovites immediately fly wherever the word “history” is spoken, and the commentary on “fake Rome” or “fake Romanov historiography” is one of the first to appear.

Even teachers in schools and universities sometimes fall into new chronology and spend the precious time of their students not on acquiring positive knowledge, but on promoting the idea of ​​“falsified history”.

Fomenkivshchina has acquired numerous imitations for more refined circles who do not want to eat the "battle on Kulishki". It is enough to name the texts famous writer and Internet troll Dmitry Galkovsky about the "falsity" of birch bark letters. Even the non-Menko people often tell about the "fake story", and the horizon of the fake is being pushed closer and closer, now, for some, only the 19th century is not fake.

"New chronology" turned into a serious social problem, if not to say - a disease. It interferes with the dissemination of historical knowledge in society, it dampens interest in the past of Russia and the Russians, it interferes with the development of a healthy national identity of the Russian people based on true history.

It can hardly deceive the fact that the Fomenkovites accompany this destructive activity with a drumbeat about the fact that Russia, being the Horde, once ruled the world, Ermak conquered America, and the Russian tsar-khans were buried in Egypt. The fictional "Empire" by Nosovsky does not have any national, civilizational, religious face, it turns into a hodgepodge of peoples, languages ​​and religions. There is nothing Russian in the "Empire" of the Fomenkovites - it is the globalist-postmodern empire of our time overturned into the past.

Fomenko is an intellectual and spiritual disease that must be treated. In this series of articles, we will first outline what the key theses of Fomenko-Nosovsky are, then we will trace what stages the "new chronology" has gone through in its development, then we will analyze with specific examples the methods of manipulating consciousness used by the Fomenkovites and, finally, we will formulate a systemic response to the challenges of the "new chronology".

Key postulates of the "new chronology"

1. It is argued that there was no antiquity, the idea of ​​it was formed in the Renaissance with the help of forgeries or by referring the texts of the 16th-17th centuries to a much earlier time.
2. It is argued that our understanding of antiquity was obtained by doubling the characters and historical events of the Renaissance. That is why world history has such an allegedly "unnatural" appearance: highly developed culture of antiquity - decline of culture in the Middle Ages - revival ancient culture humanists and imitation (actually re-creating it).
3. It is argued that the modern chronology of historical events is incorrect, it was created by two scientists Scaliger and Petavius ​​in the late 16th - mid-17th centuries, most likely for malicious purposes. According to Fomenko, it is not confirmed by modern astronomical data. A classic example of such a discrepancy is the eclipse described by Thucydides and attributed by traditional chronology to 431 BC, and Fomenko to 1039.
4. Accordingly, it is argued that the history of mankind is much shorter than we think. It begins not earlier than the 11th century, and the historical process we are cognizing acquires modern outlines ... here the data jump, since in order to defend their theory, the Fomenkovites have to declare an ever larger area to be false world history, up to late XIX century.
5. It is argued that the texts on the basis of which our ideas about antiquity and the Middle Ages are formed are either fakes, some of which were created by Italian humanists in the 15th-16th centuries, or the multiplication of duplicates of historical chronicles rewritten with different names, dates and details. V newest version NH, contrary to the earlier statements, it is said that the ancient authors are authentic, but we just understand their texts incorrectly, since we are under the spell of the "Scaligerian" chronology.
6. It is argued that the fact of falsification of historical chronicles is allegedly proved by Fomenko's unique mathematical and statistical model for the analysis of narrative texts, which shows that "dynastic flows", that is, the terms of rule and the main events in the life of monarchs in historical chronicles different in time and origin coincide, which means that before us are the same characters, reflected and duplicated in different chronicles. So, the flows of the early and late Roman emperors are supposedly identical, where Pompey corresponds to Diocletian, Augustus to Constantine, Caligula to Julian the Apostate. The dynasties of the Palaeologus and Plantagenets coincide. The Rurikovichs coincide after Alexander Nevsky and the Habsburgs who ruled Germany, etc.
7. It is argued that the global "falsification" of world history discovered by Fomenko covers up the true facts that formed the basis of its own historical myth, which began to be actively developed from the moment when Gleb Nosovsky joined Fomenko as a co-author. This myth is based on a global conspiracy theory. There was a Great Empire "Russia-Horde", which was ruled by the Russian-Mongolian tsars-khans, and its military class were the Cossacks. This empire covered Eurasia, Africa, Ermak-Cortes conquered America for her, her religion was Christianity, based on the veneration of Christ-Andronicus Comnenus, who was killed in Constantinople-Jerusalem, Islam, Buddhism, Judaism and so on gradually separated from this religion. In the 16th century, a separatist rebellion in the West began against this empire, now called the Reformation, then the insidious Romanovs seized power in the Empire, who destroyed the memory of the true past, falsified the whole history and made Russia a colony of the separatist West. The last resistance movements of the imperial soldiers were the Cossack uprisings of Razin and Pugachev. Western separatists and the Romanovs carried out a total falsification of the entire history, sending the chronicles of the events of the recent past into the distant past, forging and reprinting all the books with false dates. The enemies formed the myth of the confrontation between Russia and Turkey, Orthodoxy and Islam, in order to prevent the restoration of the Empire. Only scraps of information, like maps, on which Russia is designated as "Tartaria" have survived to us, and Fomenko and Nosovsky are digging for us these grains of genuine information from the underworld of lies.

New Chronology of "New Chronology"

The history of New Chronology has gone through 4 significantly different stages.

1. Nikolay Morozov. 1900-1930s Masonic fantasy.

At this stage, the revolutionary and freemason Nikolai Morozov (1854-1946), who spent 23 years in the Peter and Paul and Shlisselburg fortresses, formulated a general concept of denying the reliability of ancient history, based on the subjective interpretation of a number of astronomical data.

Photo: www.globallookpress.com

Morozov stated that the biblical books are zodiacs, that is, a record of the location of the constellations at the time of the compilation of the books, and began to calculate the dates when such zodiacs could be seen in the sky. All ancient literature Morozov rejected, claiming that it was falsified in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. He was the first to express the thesis that the early Roman emperors are a copy of the later ones. The biblical books, however, Morozov considered not falsification, but an encrypted recording of astronomical phenomena, on the basis of which he would transmit them.

In his works "Revelation in a Thunderstorm and a Storm" and "Christ" Morozov transferred Christ from the 1st century to the 4th, identified him with St. Basil the Great and declared that he was not crucified, but subjected to "posting," and the "Apocalypse" was composed by St. John Chrysostom. It is not difficult to notice that Christianity was at the forefront of Morozov's blow, and the main thing that he wanted to achieve was to discredit the religious faith.

At the same time, in general, Morozov's constructions are a typical product of the scientist occultism widespread at the beginning of the twentieth century, which was represented by such different figures as the Bolshevik “god-builders” - the red vampire A. Bogdanov and the head of the People's Commissariat for Education Lunacharsky, the occult decadent Bryusov.

Morozov believed that world history driven by a secret order of astrologers, and he himself tried to revive alchemy on the basis of Mendeleev's periodic law - to convert some substances into others by changing the composition of the atom. Academician Sergei Ivanovich Vavilov rightly called it "chemical fantasies."

2.Mikhail Postnikov. 1960-1970s Mathematicians are joking.

Soviet mathematician M.M. Postnikov (1927-2004) was carried away in the 1960s by the works of Morozov, willingly read extensive lectures about them, tried to arrange discussions with historians, who, however, avoided these discussions. And not so much because of the wildness of ideas, but because of the amateurish level of their presentation. Postnikov himself quotes the opinion of Lev Nikolayevich Gumilyov, a man quite capable of evaluating fantasy and unorthodox theories: "We, historians, do not get into mathematics and we ask you, mathematicians, not to get into history!"

The main achievements of Postnikov in the field of "new chronology" were the formulation the principle of continuous evolutionary accumulation of knowledge, which, in his opinion, was contradicted by the historical failure of the "dark ages", and this, in his opinion, meant that the entire period of brilliant cultural flourishing in antiquity was fictitious and falsified in the Renaissance, and history began from a low level in III-IV centuries AD, as Morozov taught.

In addition, Postnikov developed the method of "dynastic flows" - to compare data on the duration and nature of the reigns of representatives of different dynasties of different times in order to isolate duplicate areas. In this way, Postnikov, in his opinion, proved not only that the early Roman Empire is a phantom duplicate of the late one, but also the Spartan kings - a reflection of the rulers of the late Byzantine Mystra, located in the same place.

The degree of historical competence of Postnikov is extremely low, as he asserts the falsity of certain works of ancient authors, but, as a rule, incorrectly, with a delayed shift, names the dates of their first printed editions. His intellectual tools are extracts from popular science books on the history of the Soviet edition.

Another mathematician, Anatoly Fomenko, got acquainted with the new chronology through Postnikov's lectures, and at a certain moment they created a joint group with Postnikov on the “new chronology”, one of their joint texts was even published by Yuri Lotman in “Proceedings on Sign Systems” of the University of Tartu, which caused a scandal at the level of the Party Central Committee and the Academy of Sciences.

Postnikov compiled his three-volume essay "A Critical Study of Chronology the ancient world”, Multiplied by INION in 1977 (published by M .: Kraft, Lean, 2000), but he did not get the fame of the discoverer. She all went to Fomenko, who broke up with him.

If Postnikov remained an orthodox Morozov, starting his alternative history from late antiquity, then Fomenko went on a radical revision of the Morozov concept, starting new stage in the history of "new chronology". At the same time, in Fomenko's editions one can still find excerpts from Postnikov's work, given, as a rule, without any indication of the original source. For example, in a huge compendium on the "new Chronology" - "Russia and Rome: New Chronology. Russian-Horde Empire "(vols. 1-2 M .: AST, 2007) Postnikov is not mentioned never.

III. Anatoly Fomenko. 1980s - early 1990s Sect "Andronicus-shinrikyo"

Anatoly Fomenko, while retaining the foundations of postnikov's argumentation and methodology, significantly radicalized their conclusions. Not only ancient, but also the entire medieval history was brought under demolition. Fomenko stated that he developed methods of statistical analysis of narrative texts, which prove that most of the historical chronicles are corrected duplicates of each other with characters duplicating each other. His "global chronology" claimed to explain the origin of the entire variety of pictures of historical events from only four original chronicles, which were recombined and rewritten, reflected in each other.

Since Fomenko's works began to appear during the crisis of the Soviet historical science with its scholastic Marxist schemes and extremely dull presentation, Fomenkov's theory received a warm welcome: firstly, it fit into the big narrative of exposing everything and everyone, which took place under the slogan "they were hiding from us," and secondly, it was especially warmly received by the "techies" , as it created the illusion that they understand history better than "these lousy humanitarians."

And since it was at this moment that a real social default of techies fell - the institutes and factories of the military-industrial complex were closed, salaries were not paid, then Fomenkovism was one of the forms of ressentiment of this class, which had suddenly lost its place in society and its self-esteem. In fact, it was a form of escape from history, and indeed from reality in general, analogous to the spread of tough totalitarian sects in the same period - the white brotherhood, "Aum-shinrike", etc. The very concept of Christ's declaration of the Byzantine emperor Andronicus Comnenus - a usurper, murderer and pedophile, could not alienate society only in such vaguely ignorant times as the era of perestroika and the early post-Soviet period.

However, Fomenko's problem was that he introduced a predominantly negative, nihilistic content into the “new chronology” - the destruction of the old narrative, framed by a multitude of graphs and mixed with criticism of such an esoteric and incomprehensible text as Claudius Ptolemy's “Almagest”. The Fomenko region badly lacked its own positive myth, its own narrative, which appeared with the coming to the fore of Fomenko's constant co-author, Gleb Nosovsky.

IV... Gleb Nosovsky. 1995 - present time. "MMM" folk history

The mathematician Gleb Nosovsky published works on the "new chronology" already in the 1980s, trying to transmit the Cathedral of Nicaea and Easter. As a parishioner of the Old Believer Church (from which he was excommunicated after the publication of works that were obviously incompatible with Orthodoxy), he showed a keen interest in religious issues.

His name is associated with the transformation of the "new chronology" from a destructive parahistorical theory into a full-fledged "folk history" with all its elements - a large narrative, folk etymologies of names and names, revealing secret enemy conspiracies, miraculous transformations of characters, confusing history and mythology, when one stream analyzes the Trojan War, the Song of the Nibelungs and the politics of the Habsburgs.

Gradually, this folk-historical content in the "new chronology" is growing - in fact, nihilistic historical criticism is now used only as a prelude to the theory of the "Romanov conspiracy" against Russian history, from under which authors get us "true facts" that Russia this is both the Horde and Rome, that Ermak and Fernand Cortes are one person, that the Arab coins found on the territory of Russia are Russian coins.

At its core, Nosovsky's concept is a radical fomenkized transposition of Lev Gumilyov's Eurasian concept, popular in 1980-1990, about the organic coexistence of Russia and the Golden Horde, about a Eurasian alliance against the West, etc. Himself inclined to historical mythologization, Gumilev would certainly have been pretty annoyed to learn that his complex schemes for establishing closeness and interconnection between Russia and the Horde have been replaced by their rough identification to the degree of Baty - this is “Batko” ataman, and Dmitry Donskoy is Tokhtamysh.

Monument to Dmitry Donskoy. Photo: Natalia Sidorova / Shutterstock.com

During this period, the "New Chronology" actually turned into a commercial cult, similar to many sects and built on the principle of a "pyramid" - it is necessary to continuously maintain the interest of readers, and for this to come out with new and new revelations, reveal more and more secrets, cover everything new and new areas. In addition, the increase to an impossible degree of the amount of material and absurd statements makes it possible to almost completely paralyze criticism, since the subject of dispute is blurred and a single point of reference is lost. What was “falsification” yesterday turns out to be a “secret message” today, in which there are signs of truth that only need to be deciphered. But if this "message" reveals some facts that reveal the falsehood of Fomenkov's hypothesis, then these are, of course, late interpolations. Hence the method of actual spam, when Fomenkovism attracts more and more topics and statements, allegedly proving its main theses.

In Fomenkov's concept, a "game for promotion" began and in terms of rhetorical flirting with patriotism, they say, only Fomenkov's version of history reveals the true greatness of Russia, and those who disagree with it are participants in a Russophobic conspiracy. The fact that we are not talking about any kind of Russia at all, that the Fomenkovism is destroying it, the deafened by pseudo-Slavophile chatter, the readers do not even think. This stage, when the "new chronology" exists as an ever-expanding factory of quasi-historical myths, continues to this day.

Followers of the "new chronology", as a rule, are divided into two distinct types, even if they themselves do not admit it to themselves - on Fomenkovtsev and nosovtsev... Representatives of the first type are more interested in the theory of forgery of antiquity, the falsity of chronology, a skeptical attitude towards historical sources... Most of the epigones of Fomenkovism, as a rule, also take the first, nihilistic position. Representatives of the second type are more interested in the myth of the former great Empire, the search for information about it, encrypted in various sources that have come down to us.

It is important to understand that the Fomenkovo ​​and Nosov parts of the "New Chronology" fundamentally contradict each other both in their general spirit and in methodology. One is historical nihilism, the other is historical myth-making.

For example, within the framework of Fomenkov's destructive methodology, it is "obvious" that Herodotus, Josephus, as well as other ancient historians, is a falsification of the Renaissance. At the same time, within the framework of the Nosov historical myth, it is no less "obvious" that Herodotus is a real author who lived in the 16th century, who can serve as a valuable source of information from the "Empire", if interpreted correctly, the problem is not a fake, but misinterpretation of it by the "medieval scholastics". From Joseph Flavius ​​Nosovsky even draws information with both hands, for example, he finds a story about Stenka Razin from him.

Within the framework of co-authorship, whose constructions claim to be scientific and true, such opposite models could not coexist. But since NH is a commercial cult in which the authors are least interested in the truth, most of Fomenko-Nosovsky's editions are a text-centaur, where two conflicting methodologies and historical mythologies live in adjacent chapters. However, due to the higher productivity, the "Nos" part of this centaur is gradually spreading out due to the Fomenkovo ​​part.

In the next article we will talk about the methods of manipulating consciousness, up to direct falsifications, used by the authors of the "New Chronology" to involve adepts in their sect.

Modern history is full of white spots, inconsistencies and contradictions. And, as usual since ancient times, scientists always try to fill such gaps: some theories are full common sense and, most likely, they correspond to reality, some remain just hypotheses, awaiting confirmation or exposure by a new generation of scientists. As you know, only time will put everything in its place.

The existence of the Great Roman Empire or the Mongol Empire is still known from the school history course. But, most likely, few of us have heard of the existence of Great Tartary. And even if he did, he hardly knows that some three hundred years ago this country was one of the largest in the world. But what kind of state is this, where did it come from and why now almost no one knows about it? But Giacomo Puccini, William Shakespeare, Mary Shelley, Charles Dickens, Robert Browning, Jeffrey Chaucer mention Tartaria in their works ...

Tartary: the mysterious disappearance

At the most, with which one who first heard about Tartary now has an association, is the Greek mythological Tartarus, the proverb “to fall into tartaras” and, possibly, the notorious Mongol-Tatar yoke. But disputes about this country have been stirring the minds of scientists for many years and, interestingly, the most popular and hotly discussed theories belong to Russian researchers. Let us dwell on the point of view of the mathematician G.V. Nosovskii and the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences A.T. Fomenko.

So, according to the researchers, the basis of the "proceedings" around Tartary was the presence of the country in some geographical atlases and maps until the end of the 18th century and its disappearance from the 19th century. Most of the questions are left by the fundamental edition of the Britannica - in late XVIII century it was she who was one of complete assemblies information from various fields of knowledge.

So, during the publication of the first edition of the three-volume encyclopedia in 1771, several maps of Europe and Asia were given in the "Geography" section. And here the most interesting thing begins: in the territory that we have always considered the territory of the Russian Empire, in the 18th century there were several states: Russia (with the capital in St. Petersburg), Moscow, or Great, Tartary (with the capital in Tobolsk and with the square three times the size of Russia), Independent Tartaria (with its capital in Samarkand) and Chinese Tartaria (with its capital in King Yan). According to the map of 1771, Great Tartary was the largest state, which included all of the above territories plus part of the North American continent!

What is even more interesting, already in the second edition of the encyclopedia (and this is only 1777-1784) the Eurasian map acquired a more familiar appearance, and there is no Tartary there. It is on this fact that the tandem focuses Russian researchers... But where could it disappear huge state? Why have we not heard anything about him for almost 250 years?

The hidden meaning of the Pugachev uprising

According to Fomenko and Nosovsky, the whole thing is in the wars of the end of the 18th century, when the stormy conquest of the lands of Great Tartary began. The process took place from two sides at once: the troops of the Romanovs first entered the Russian-Horde Siberia and the Far East, and the troops of the newly formed United States for the first time entered the western half of the North American continent. Just after these events, the inscription “Great Tartary” disappeared from the map of Siberia.

Nosovsky and Fomenko believe that at the end of the 18th century a decisive battle took place between Western Europe and Romanov Russia on the one hand and the last fragment of Russia-Horde Tobolsk Siberian-American state on the other. This large-scale war, according to researchers, was then falsely presented in the pages of history as a war with peasants and Cossacks led by Yemelyan Pugachev. Romanov historians, Nosovsky argues, distorted history and presented this war as the suppression of a peasant uprising.

According to Fomenko, the Ural factories and enterprises (or rather, their workers, who are assigned a significant role in describing the Pugachev uprising) actually belonged to Moscow Tartary, whose troops were commanded by Pugachev - therefore they "served" his troops.

Despite the unpreparedness and small number of the troops of the "rebels" and the outnumbered troops of the Romanovs, Pugachev very successfully advanced towards Moscow. And, which is already quite interesting, the commander of the troops from the side of the Romanov empire was Suvorov, who had just arrived from the front after the war with the Turks. It turns out that the greatest commander of the country was called to resist the "gangs" of peasants. But in the version of historians, it was just the suppression of a peasant revolt - why involve such a famous commander who had just returned from the war? Was it really impossible to cope with the insurgent peasants with less forces?

Another argument in favor of this hypothesis is that the trial of Pugachev took place in the Throne Room of the Kremlin Palace. But if Pugachev was in fact a simple Cossack, would he really be tried in the famous Throne Hall? But if in his person the Romanovs condemned and judged Great Tartary and celebrated the victory over her, then the symbolic choice of the Throne Hall is understandable.

And one more fact: it was only after the victory over Pugachev that the Romanovs began to use Siberia as a place of exile. For example, in the same Tobolsk, prisoners began to be exiled only from 1790 - before that, the "guilty" languished in exile exclusively on the Solovetsky Islands. It turns out that only after winning the war with Pugachev, the Romanovs first got access to Siberia?

And to continue the theme of Pugachev: in 1775 the Russian government forbids any mention of his name; Zimoveyskaya stanitsa, where Pugachev was allegedly born, was renamed Potemkinskaya; the Yaik River becomes the Ural, and the Yaik Cossacks become the Ural. The Volga Cossack army was disbanded altogether. These are the significant changes that took place after the suppression of just a "simple" uprising of the peasants ...

Fomenko and Nosovsky have no doubt that at the end of the 18th century, after the Great Tartary was defeated in the war, known to us from the course of school history, as the Pugachev uprising of 1773-1775, this name on the maps began to gradually be replaced by a much more familiar us the term "Russian Empire".

A fly in the ointment in a barrel of honey

Of course, a beautiful and exciting theory that makes you think about a lot and rethink many historical facts and realities. But, as with any theory, there are weaknesses in it.

To begin with, in no version of the history of Tartary there is not a single mention of the names of its kings, there is not a single mention of the commanders-in-chief of its troops. Even if we assume that Pugachev was not just a leader Peasant war, and fought for the Great Tartary, his surname is just a derivative of the nickname of his grandfather - Mikhail Pugach (in turn, this nickname came from "scare", "scarecrow"). Yes, and do not forget that, according to popular opinion, Pugachev is just an impostor: using rumors that Emperor Peter III is alive, Pugachev was called by his name. He was one of several dozen impostors posing as Peter, though he was the most famous of them.

There is not a single mention of Tartary and the Arab travelers of the 9th century, who described in great detail the life of the "Pagan Rus", does not say a word about Tartary, and Mikhail Lomonosov in his famous works about the Russian state - and after all, he just had to live in Tartary!

Move on. If Great Tartary is so ancient state why does its name appear only in XVII-XVIII centuries? None of the ancient geographers - Nearchus, Dionysius Perieget, Strabo, Pliny, Pomponius Mela - ever mentioned Tartary. How could such a large and ancient state appear out of nowhere and disappear almost without a trace? Why are archaeologically reliable artifacts from the ancient Egyptians, Sumerians or Chinese preserved, but there are no reasoned "Tartarian" finds?

And one more very important question. Researchers cite the presence of Tartary in the first edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. And then, after a dozen years, the state, they say, simply completely disappears, which testifies to the rigging of facts. But it turns out that Tartary did not go anywhere after the Pugachev uprising. In the history of cartography and geography, both Tartaria (Tataria) and Great Tartaria (Great Tataria) are mentioned - hundreds of references to Tartaria are found in the books of the Russian Empire, the Soviet era and in modern Russian literature. For example, they “remember” about Tartary in the “Collection of travels to the Tatars and other eastern peoples in the XIII, XIV and XV centuries” (A. Yazykov, 1825), in the “Reference Encyclopedic Dictionary” (St. Petersburg, K. Kraya Printing House, 1848), in " Encyclopedic Dictionary F. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron "(S.-Pb .: Brockhaus-Efron, 1890-1907), in" Essays on the history of Russian geography "(MS Bodnarsky, 1947), in the" History of literature of the Urals and Siberia of the 17th century "(EI Dergacheva-Skop, 1965), in the" School Dictionary of Geographical Names "(EM Pospelov, 2000).

But what about the Encyclopedia Britannica? What about the absence of Tartary in all subsequent issues after the first (and, by the way, there were fifteen of them only in print)? After all, if the definition of Tartary was removed from the encyclopedia, then there is something to hide and silence is clearly not for nothing? But the facts remain the facts: in almost all editions of the British Encyclopedia of Tartaria ... is present! Apparently, Nosovsky and Fomenko either limited themselves to just the first issue of the folio, or for some reason kept silent about further mentions, or simply "forgot" to tell about it in their publications.

Of course, Tartary is an unpaved field for research, which is simply teeming with "black holes" and historical questions. And, we hope, each reader will draw his own conclusion from this story, but we would refrain from “inscribing” Tartary into the global historical scheme of Europe, Asia and Russia. To carry out such a "binding", it is necessary to have monumental knowledge that goes beyond the school curriculum and, most importantly, to have irrefutable facts and evidence. And scientists and historians in this direction are clearly not enough of them. Perhaps not enough yet ...

Prepared by A. Romanenko
Based on materials