Hydra instant stores in Tor. Detailed analysis of individual universities
Enter the captcha:
2. Complete fast registration
3. Enter your login and password
If access to the site is locked, see "Bypass blocking"
Configure TOR-connection and bridges for Windows
1. Download Tor from the site of the developer. https://www.torproject.org/projects/TorBrowser.html.2. Go to the section "Bridges" https://bridges.torproject.org/options. And click "Just Give Me Bridges!"
3. Pass the security capping.
4. Copy the code obtained before.
5. Come in the browser - Settings - "Tor Settings".
6. Select "Tor is prohibited in my country", then insert a pre-copied code into the string and click "OK".
7. Excellent, now Tor for Windows is configured.
Tor connection and bridges for Apple iOS Onion-Browser
1. To begin with, the ONION Browser needs to download in the App Store.2. After downloading, go and open the menu.
3. Select "Browser Settings".
6. To apply settings, simply restart the application.
7. Everything is ready for use.
Bridges and gateways through TOR connections for Android OS
1. If there is no, then you download the Orbot application via Play MARKET.2. At first launch, the selection of bridges will be proposed. On the third, choose Tell Me More.
3. In the new window, select - "Request New Bridges".
5. You are on the official website for TOR. Pass the security capping.
7. Open the orbote app and go to the settings (three points in the right corner).
8. Scroll to the section "Bridges and come there.
9. In the new window, copy and paste the connection code through the bridge.
10. Everything is ready for use.
Download Tor Browser from an official site.
In May 2016, DOU was held about universities in which IT experts study or studied. Such surveys were conducted and, but this year we decided to make an assessment more complete and comprehensive.
As we thought
To build a rating was chosen evaluation of readiness to recommend its faculty or department as a place of learning. We used this particular indicator, because it is less dependent on the subjective life circumstances of the respondent (for example, nostalgia for adolescence or displeasure insufficient efforts attached during training). In addition, since the recommendation is done "for the future", the respondent can take into account not only personal experience Learning, but also any information about the university received after the release - in this way we get a more objective assessment.
results
The lowest estimates were obtained (5.7) and (4.7).
The rest of the universities received average estimates - not higher and not lower than the average level.
Interestingly, the rating leads the universities of a common profile (with the exception of Khnure). While specialized technical universities, such as KPI, Lviv Polytechnic, ONPU, Hai, KPI, DonNTU received average estimates, and VNTU and NAU even below average.
In addition to high estimates, there are several separate highly appreciated faculties in medium universities.
This is faculty applied mathematics B (estimate 7.3), as well as several faculties: Physico-Technical Institute (PTI) - 7.4 points, Faculty of Applied Mathematics (FPM) - 7.3 points, Institute of Applied Systemic Analysis (IPSA) - 7.0 points .
KPI, being the largest university for IT education (a quarter of respondents learn or studied in this university), received average estimates. The main reason is the scatter in estimates of different faculties. As opposed to the aforementioned stronger faculties (FTI, FPM, IPSA), FVT, TEF and FEL, received secondary estimates () are also analyzed in the study.
To view data on all universities, use the widget below or table with all data. Full data array can be downloaded on GitHub.
Green highlighted values \u200b\u200babove average throughout the sample, orange - Below average throughout the sample. Values \u200b\u200bin cells without pouring does not differ from the middle sample (the level of significance is 90%).
Cells with numbers show average rating On a scale from 1 to 10, with% - a share of all respondents of a particular university / faculty.
| Total rating: Readiness to recommend the Department / Faculty Prestige Faculty Organization educational process, availability of bureaucracy, informing students Learn difficult Database Good explanations, understandable material feed Technical condition of premises Group / Stream: Level of Knowledge, Motivation Involvement and support for students in research activities Financial efficiency (attraction and distribution of funds) Faced bribes personally IT experts performed as invited lecturers Enough cooperation with IT companies in the field of employment Would not change the place of learning |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University | Number of questionnaires | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Evaluation | Share | Evaluation | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share | Share |
| 1. 63 questionnaires | 63 | 8,3 | 8,1 | 8,0 | 8,6 | 6,1 | 7,4 | 7,4 | 6,9 | 97% | 95% | 83% | 90% | 32% | 41% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 10% | 17% | 7,5 | 7,0 | 7,0 | 7,3 | 7,9 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 7,6 | 7,5 | 25% | 6,6 | 63% | 0% | 73% | 63% | 52% | 30% | 14% | 76% | 60% | 46% | 57% |
| Faculty of Informatics 60 Questionnaire | 60 | 8,4 | 8,2 | 8,0 | 8,6 | 6,1 | 7,4 | 7,5 | 6,9 | 100% | 97% | 85% | 93% | 33% | 43% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 10% | 17% | 7,5 | 7,0 | 6,9 | 7,4 | 8,0 | 8,1 | 7,3 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 27% | 6,7 | 63% | 0% | 75% | 65% | 53% | 32% | 15% | 78% | 62% | 47% | 58% |
| 2. 182 questionnaires | 182 | 7,3 | 7,6 | 6,7 | 6,4 | 6,0 | 6,3 | 6,1 | 4,8 | 70% | 75% | 57% | 33% | 40% | 23% | 8% | 9% | 13% | 3% | 4% | 6,9 | 5,8 | 5,6 | 5,6 | 5,6 | 6,5 | 7,0 | 4,8 | 6,2 | 28% | 4,3 | 48% | 5% | 44% | 30% | 21% | 25% | 22% | 36% | 37% | 31% | 43% |
| Faculty of Cybernetics 88 Questionnaire | 88 | 7,7 | 8,4 | 6,3 | 6,1 | 5,6 | 6,0 | 6,2 | 5,0 | 95% | 92% | 66% | 59% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 15% | 18% | 2% | 9% | 6,9 | 5,7 | 4,9 | 5,3 | 5,5 | 6,1 | 7,2 | 4,9 | 6,7 | 15% | 4,5 | 44% | 8% | 52% | 40% | 18% | 38% | 27% | 47% | 42% | 26% | 53% |
| Faculty of radiophysics, electronics and computer Systems 44 questionnaires | 44 | 7,0 | 6,5 | 7,0 | 7,1 | 6,6 | 6,4 | 6,0 | 4,6 | 55% | 66% | 57% | 2% | 64% | 27% | 9% | 7% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 6,7 | 6,2 | 5,8 | 5,8 | 6,2 | 6,8 | 6,9 | 4,5 | 6,0 | 43% | 4,1 | 50% | 0% | 39% | 41% | 32% | 18% | 27% | 34% | 45% | 36% | 39% |
| 3. 218 Questionnaire | 218 | 7,3 | 7,2 | 6,1 | 6,4 | 5,1 | 6,5 | 6,5 | 5,3 | 87% | 77% | 53% | 58% | 48% | 44% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 3% | 0% | 6,5 | 6,0 | 5,2 | 6,5 | 6,7 | 7,0 | 6,2 | 3,8 | 5,5 | 17% | 4,9 | 55% | 50% | 47% | 44% | 41% | 39% | 25% | 53% | 59% | 50% | 51% |
| Faculty of Computer Sciences 110 Questionnaire | 110 | 8,0 | 8,1 | 6,2 | 6,6 | 5,3 | 6,5 | 6,8 | 6,0 | 95% | 76% | 49% | 84% | 63% | 62% | 41% | 41% | 16% | 3% | 0% | 6,6 | 6,2 | 5,2 | 6,7 | 6,9 | 7,0 | 6,9 | 4,2 | 6,1 | 15% | 5,2 | 58% | 41% | 60% | 60% | 55% | 51% | 35% | 60% | 74% | 59% | 61% |
| Faculty of Computer Engineering and Control 59 Questionnaire | 59 | 6,8 | 6,7 | 5,9 | 6,1 | 4,8 | 6,5 | 6,4 | 4,8 | 85% | 86% | 59% | 32% | 37% | 25% | 31% | 10% | 10% | 5% | 2% | 6,3 | 5,7 | 5,2 | 6,5 | 6,7 | 7,2 | 5,3 | 3,6 | 5,0 | 24% | 4,8 | 54% | 66% | 41% | 31% | 25% | 29% | 8% | 47% | 49% | 42% | 46% |
| 4. 43 questionnaires | 43 | 7,2 | 7,3 | 6,9 | 6,7 | 5,5 | 6,3 | 5,5 | 5,1 | 95% | 91% | 56% | 67% | 40% | 81% | 67% | 49% | 40% | 16% | 2% | 6,8 | 5,9 | 4,9 | 7,0 | 7,6 | 7,5 | 6,3 | 4,7 | 7,3 | 19% | 5,8 | 70% | 7% | 70% | 49% | 42% | 23% | 12% | 79% | 44% | 42% | 47% |
| Faculty of Computer Sciences 40 Questionnaire | 40 | 7,3 | 7,6 | 7,0 | 6,8 | 5,7 | 6,5 | 5,6 | 5,1 | 95% | 93% | 60% | 73% | 38% | 83% | 70% | 53% | 43% | 18% | 3% | 6,7 | 6,0 | 4,8 | 7,1 | 7,8 | 7,6 | 6,4 | 4,9 | 7,5 | 18% | 6,0 | 73% | 5% | 73% | 53% | 45% | 25% | 13% | 83% | 48% | 43% | 50% |
| 5. 73 questionnaires | 73 | 6,6 | 6,8 | 7,0 | 7,4 | 4,6 | 5,9 | 5,3 | 4,5 | 82% | 77% | 68% | 42% | 36% | 36% | 62% | 25% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 6,5 | 5,6 | 5,5 | 7,1 | 7,0 | 7,5 | 6,3 | 4,2 | 6,1 | 33% | 6,2 | 36% | 19% | 40% | 41% | 67% | 33% | 16% | 64% | 56% | 52% | 44% |
| Faculty of electronics I. information technologies 63 questionnaires | 63 | 6,6 | 6,8 | 7,0 | 7,6 | 4,7 | 6,0 | 5,4 | 4,7 | 87% | 84% | 75% | 49% | 40% | 38% | 68% | 27% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 6,5 | 5,6 | 5,5 | 7,1 | 7,0 | 7,6 | 6,2 | 4,3 | 6,4 | 32% | 6,1 | 33% | 19% | 43% | 46% | 73% | 37% | 14% | 70% | 63% | 51% | 46% |
| 6. 73 questionnaires | 73 | 6,5 | 6,9 | 5,7 | 5,5 | 5,6 | 5,7 | 5,4 | 3,8 | 75% | 71% | 22% | 40% | 58% | 25% | 12% | 5% | 3% | 0% | 1% | 5,9 | 5,1 | 5,6 | 5,4 | 5,6 | 6,0 | 6,8 | 4,2 | 5,4 | 11% | 3,8 | 66% | 29% | 37% | 26% | 12% | 30% | 30% | 41% | 29% | 30% | 33% |
| Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Informatics 52 Questionnaire | 52 | 6,8 | 7,6 | 5,7 | 5,6 | 5,8 | 5,7 | 5,7 | 4,1 | 90% | 92% | 21% | 54% | 77% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 5,7 | 4,9 | 5,3 | 5,7 | 6,1 | 5,9 | 6,8 | 4,3 | 6,0 | 10% | 3,9 | 65% | 23% | 44% | 35% | 17% | 37% | 35% | 52% | 37% | 25% | 38% |
| 7. 100 Questionnaire | 100 | 6,5 | 6,5 | 5,3 | 5,7 | 5,3 | 5,8 | 5,3 | 3,7 | 72% | 75% | 52% | 35% | 32% | 35% | 22% | 5% | 4% | 2% | 1% | 6,4 | 5,2 | 5,1 | 3,8 | 4,0 | 5,3 | 5,9 | 3,6 | 4,4 | 5% | 3,3 | 40% | 41% | 34% | 17% | 14% | 16% | 19% | 32% | 22% | 34% | 27% |
| Faculty of Applied Mathematics 53 Questionnaire | 53 | 7,3 | 7,3 | 5,6 | 6,0 | 5,8 | 6,2 | 5,8 | 4,2 | 87% | 87% | 62% | 43% | 36% | 43% | 26% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 2% | 6,3 | 5,0 | 5,4 | 4,2 | 4,2 | 5,3 | 6,5 | 4,1 | 5,3 | 8% | 3,5 | 42% | 40% | 51% | 30% | 23% | 26% | 32% | 43% | 36% | 34% | 34% |
| 8. 171 Profile | 171 | 6,4 | 6,8 | 5,5 | 5,5 | 5,3 | 5,6 | 5,6 | 4,1 | 85% | 77% | 82% | 30% | 35% | 27% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 1% | 5,9 | 5,3 | 4,8 | 6,3 | 6,0 | 6,0 | 5,8 | 3,8 | 5,2 | 13% | 4,8 | 52% | 57% | 48% | 46% | 28% | 31% | 22% | 42% | 47% | 41% | 36% |
| Institute of Computer Sciences and Information Technologies 105 Questionnaire | 105 | 6,6 | 7,1 | 5,3 | 5,5 | 5,0 | 5,6 | 5,5 | 4,0 | 88% | 82% | 82% | 39% | 37% | 32% | 23% | 16% | 8% | 6% | 1% | 5,8 | 5,3 | 4,8 | 6,5 | 6,4 | 6,2 | 6,1 | 4,0 | 5,6 | 17% | 4,8 | 50% | 51% | 48% | 58% | 33% | 38% | 25% | 47% | 56% | 48% | 40% |
| Institute computer technology, automatics and metrology 44 questionnaires | 44 | 6,0 | 6,1 | 5,5 | 4,8 | 5,6 | 5,8 | 5,8 | 4,5 | 84% | 70% | 84% | 14% | 34% | 14% | 14% | 11% | 2% | 5% | 0% | 6,0 | 5,2 | 4,9 | 5,7 | 5,0 | 5,5 | 5,3 | 3,2 | 4,5 | 7% | not enough data | 50% | 80% | 43% | 32% | 16% | 16% | 20% | 36% | 23% | 27% | 36% |
| 9. 63 questionnaires | 63 | 6,3 | 6,1 | 5,6 | 6,3 | 4,7 | 5,4 | 5,4 | 3,8 | 75% | 78% | 68% | 54% | 10% | 21% | 21% | 16% | 2% | 3% | 0% | 6,1 | 5,5 | 4,7 | 4,9 | 5,1 | 5,5 | 5,5 | 3,5 | 4,6 | 13% | 3,5 | 32% | 54% | 38% | 22% | 21% | 35% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 38% | 32% |
| Institute of Computer Systems 50 Questionnaire | 50 | 6,3 | 6,2 | 5,6 | 6,4 | 4,8 | 5,1 | 5,3 | 3,7 | 80% | 88% | 74% | 64% | 10% | 26% | 26% | 16% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 5,8 | 5,0 | 4,5 | 4,9 | 5,1 | 5,2 | 5,5 | 3,4 | 4,6 | 12% | 3,6 | 32% | 56% | 44% | 24% | 20% | 42% | 8% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 32% |
| 10. 784 questionnaires | 784 | 6,2 | 6,8 | 5,1 | 5,4 | 6,0 | 5,6 | 5,4 | 4,0 | 80% | 77% | 67% | 49% | 44% | 27% | 21% | 15% | 15% | 4% | 1% | 5,8 | 5,0 | 5,0 | 4,8 | 5,4 | 5,9 | 6,3 | 4,3 | 5,6 | 13% | 4,0 | 37% | 27% | 35% | 36% | 24% | 22% | 13% | 37% | 33% | 42% | 39% |
| FTI 54 questionnaire | 54 | 7,4 | 7,6 | 6,1 | 6,5 | 7,1 | 6,8 | 6,1 | 5,6 | 80% | 96% | 46% | 65% | 28% | 50% | 63% | 44% | 26% | 4% | 2% | 6,4 | 5,8 | 5,9 | 5,6 | 6,1 | 6,9 | 6,8 | 5,0 | 6,3 | 30% | 4,7 | 44% | 11% | 65% | 69% | 37% | 30% | 17% | 63% | 39% | 48% | 46% |
| FPM 96 questionnaire | 96 | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,8 | 5,9 | 6,1 | 6,0 | 6,3 | 5,0 | 93% | 85% | 84% | 68% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 20% | 29% | 4% | 0% | 6,1 | 5,5 | 5,3 | 5,3 | 5,5 | 5,9 | 6,3 | 4,0 | 5,8 | 9% | 4,6 | 47% | 13% | 45% | 40% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 41% | 31% | 41% | 50% |
| IPSA 90 Questionnaire | 90 | 7,0 | 8,4 | 5,8 | 6,3 | 7,2 | 6,1 | 6,1 | 4,7 | 96% | 93% | 90% | 36% | 50% | 16% | 12% | 22% | 9% | 8% | 2% | 6,6 | 5,2 | 5,7 | 5,6 | 6,5 | 6,7 | 7,3 | 4,7 | 5,9 | 18% | 4,7 | 56% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 27% | 30% | 9% | 59% | 32% | 44% | 44% |
| FVT 268 Questionnaire | 268 | 6,0 | 7,2 | 4,4 | 4,8 | 5,8 | 5,2 | 5,2 | 3,6 | 90% | 75% | 62% | 59% | 59% | 25% | 22% | 13% | 20% | 4% | 1% | 5,2 | 4,5 | 4,3 | 4,3 | 5,2 | 5,6 | 6,3 | 4,2 | 5,8 | 7% | 3,5 | 31% | 27% | 38% | 38% | 27% | 32% | 18% | 36% | 46% | 38% | 43% |
| TEF 85 questionnaire | 85 | 5,9 | 5,6 | 4,8 | 5,1 | 5,5 | 5,3 | 5,0 | 3,8 | 92% | 88% | 79% | 65% | 71% | 53% | 39% | 14% | 2% | 4% | 0% | 5,5 | 4,5 | 4,6 | 4,6 | 5,3 | 5,1 | 6,4 | 4,0 | 5,1 | 6% | 4,0 | 27% | 48% | 28% | 53% | 29% | 12% | 4% | 35% | 25% | 32% | 36% |
| Fal 47 questionnaire | 47 | 5,8 | 5,7 | 4,6 | 5,4 | 5,6 | 5,4 | 4,7 | 3,2 | 28% | 57% | 74% | 6% | 9% | 4% | 11% | 0% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 6,0 | 4,8 | 5,2 | 3,6 | 4,5 | 5,2 | 5,6 | 3,5 | 5,0 | 17% | 3,3 | 36% | 47% | 13% | 19% | 9% | 11% | 9% | 23% | 19% | 53% | 30% |
| 11. 48 Questionnaire | 48 | 6,1 | 6,0 | 6,0 | 6,0 | 5,7 | 6,2 | 5,6 | 3,8 | 69% | 81% | 65% | 60% | 29% | 33% | 23% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 6,5 | 5,7 | 5,9 | 4,9 | 5,6 | 6,0 | 6,7 | 4,9 | 5,1 | 33% | 4,5 | 35% | 31% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 35% | 23% | 42% | 31% |
| 12. 107 Questionnaire | 107 | 6,1 | 6,2 | 6,0 | 6,7 | 4,4 | 5,6 | 5,4 | 4,1 | 88% | 79% | 60% | 47% | 37% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 10% | 1% | 0% | 6,2 | 5,2 | 4,9 | 5,1 | 5,9 | 5,7 | 5,5 | 3,3 | 4,6 | 9% | 4,6 | 45% | 45% | 34% | 29% | 20% | 16% | 12% | 36% | 48% | 36% | 36% |
| Computer and Information Technologies (KIT) 44 Questionnaires | 44 | 6,0 | 5,9 | 6,1 | 7,5 | 4,3 | 5,3 | 5,2 | 4,0 | 91% | 91% | 80% | 45% | 30% | 39% | 32% | 20% | 20% | 2% | 0% | 6,3 | 4,9 | 4,7 | 4,6 | 5,7 | 5,9 | 5,4 | 3,7 | 5,2 | 11% | not enough data | 55% | 41% | 34% | 39% | 34% | 25% | 11% | 43% | 55% | 36% | 48% |
| 13. 77 questionnaires | 77 | 6,1 | 6,2 | 5,9 | 6,4 | 5,0 | 6,5 | 5,7 | 4,2 | 71% | 64% | 56% | 42% | 35% | 35% | 32% | 21% | 5% | 4% | 1% | 6,7 | 5,9 | 5,5 | 7,0 | 6,7 | 7,0 | 5,7 | 4,9 | 4,4 | 19% | 5,3 | 55% | 55% | 29% | 42% | 23% | 19% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 57% | 31% |
| 14. 69 questionnaires | 69 | 6,0 | 6,5 | 5,9 | 5,8 | 5,8 | 6,3 | 6,0 | 4,0 | 90% | 90% | 83% | 43% | 38% | 42% | 38% | 17% | 1% | 7% | 0% | 6,4 | 5,4 | 5,3 | 5,0 | 5,5 | 6,2 | 6,3 | 3,6 | 4,4 | 7% | 3,8 | 41% | 54% | 32% | 25% | 9% | 14% | 17% | 36% | 20% | 49% | 41% |
| Faculty of Computer Science and Technology 52 Questionnaire | 52 | 6,4 | 6,7 | 5,9 | 5,7 | 6,0 | 6,2 | 6,0 | 4,1 | 92% | 90% | 88% | 56% | 46% | 50% | 42% | 21% | 2% | 8% | 0% | 6,5 | 5,3 | 5,2 | 4,9 | 5,4 | 6,1 | 6,5 | 3,6 | 4,5 | 8% | 3,9 | 44% | 54% | 38% | 27% | 10% | 19% | 17% | 38% | 21% | 46% | 48% |
| 15. 77 questionnaires | 77 | 5,7 | 5,9 | 4,7 | 5,8 | 4,2 | 4,8 | 4,6 | 3,4 | 75% | 74% | 65% | 42% | 29% | 13% | 18% | 10% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 5,6 | 4,1 | 4,2 | 4,7 | 5,0 | 5,8 | 5,3 | 3,8 | 5,5 | 23% | 3,6 | 38% | 75% | 34% | 26% | 21% | 39% | 23% | 34% | 34% | 42% | 30% |
| Faculty of Information Technology and Computer Engineering 50 Questionnaire | 50 | 5,3 | 5,9 | 4,2 | 5,4 | 4,0 | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,9 | 86% | 80% | 60% | 54% | 36% | 16% | 16% | 10% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 5,1 | 3,5 | 3,9 | 4,6 | 4,7 | 5,6 | 5,1 | 3,6 | 4,7 | 14% | 3,1 | 30% | 80% | 28% | 34% | 16% | 40% | 24% | 34% | 30% | 32% | 30% |
| 16. 146 Questionnaire | 146 | 4,7 | 5,2 | 4,2 | 4,6 | 4,5 | 4,6 | 4,1 | 2,8 | 77% | 65% | 49% | 28% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 1% | 3% | 1% | 4,8 | 3,8 | 3,9 | 4,7 | 4,4 | 4,8 | 4,8 | 3,1 | 3,7 | 7% | 3,0 | 21% | 58% | 32% | 3% | 16% | 9% | 5% | 21% | 8% | 22% | 18% |
| Institute of Computer Information Technologies 110 Questionnaire | 110 | 4,7 | 5,4 | 4,1 | 4,6 | 4,3 | 4,4 | 4,1 | 2,8 | 85% | 69% | 53% | 33% | 37% | 40% | 21% | 15% | 1% | 3% | 1% | 4,7 | 3,7 | 3,7 | 4,5 | 4,3 | 4,6 | 4,8 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 3% | 2,9 | 18% | 54% | 38% | 3% | 17% | 12% | 5% | 23% | 6% | 15% | 20% |
| Another university 787 questionnaire | 787 | 5,6 | 5,8 | 5,6 | 6,0 | 4,7 | 5,6 | 5,0 | 3,7 | 82% | 67% | 52% | 37% | 32% | 29% | 30% | 9% | 6% | 2% | 2% | 5,9 | 5,0 | 4,8 | 5,8 | 5,9 | 5,9 | 5,2 | 3,4 | 4,8 | 12% | 4,1 | 41% | 47% | 35% | 15% | 12% | 14% | 11% | 27% | 19% | 47% | 28% |
| All respondents 3081 questionnaire | 3081 | 6,2 | 6,5 | 5,6 | 5,9 | 5,3 | 5,7 | 5,4 | 4,1 | 81% | 74% | 60% | 44% | 37% | 30% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 4% | 2% | 6,1 | 5,2 | 5,0 | 5,5 | 5,7 | 6,1 | 5,9 | 4,0 | 5,2 | 15% | 4,2 | 43% | 39% | 38% | 29% | 22% | 22% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 42% | 36% |
Ukrainian IT education: you can write off and give bribes, but prestigious
Estimates of different learning parameters range from 5 to 6 through a 10-point scale, rarely exceed 6 points. The prestige of the faculty is as high as high as possible - 6.5 on average for all universities.
Respondents talk about a rather loyal attitude to writing off and plagiarism - this item was estimating 5.0 out of 10 (where 10 means "it is very difficult to write off or pass someone else's work").
Pretty high and level of corruption: as we already, 39% of respondents personally faced with bribery cases.
The main problems of the IT for IT: the weak alumini community, outdated knowledge and financial inefficiency
It is these parameters of universities that were assessed below.
- community of graduates (university assistance, the presence of "common values") - 4.0;
- the relevance of the knowledge provided to work in IT - 4.1;
- the financial efficiency of the university (the optimality of attracting and distributing resources) is 4.2.
The inactivity of knowledge is displayed in the assessments of the work of teachers. If the understanding of the explanation and supply of the material is estimated by an average of 6.1, then practical experience Applications and ability to explain how to apply knowledge in practice is assessed worse - by 5.2.
Of the technologies listed in the questionnaire, the databases are taught most often in universities (81% of respondents have been studied), C ++ (74%) and C (60%). Java in the university studied 44% of respondents, JavaScript - 30%, QA - 15%.
Hope flashing: collaboration of universities and IT companies
Despite the low estimates of the relevance and usefulness of knowledge, the hope of universities with IT companies, in particular, attracting IT professionals for teaching and joint events with the aim of employment of students.
37% of respondents noted that their faculty attracted to the teaching of practitioners from the IT-sphere - True, 30% believe that it was worth doing more often.
In addition to attracting IT professionals for teaching, faculties cooperate with IT companies and other ways: 38% of respondents noted that IT specialists acted in their faculties as invited lecturers, 29% - that IT companies helped faculties with technical support.
32% of respondents believe that their university cooperates quite actively with IT companies in employment.
Details of this data on cooperation with IT companies in universities can be viewed.
Detailed analysis of individual universities
Naugma
In the survey, the university is mainly represented by the Faculty of Informatics.
Almost all assessments of Naukma were higher than the sample: image, the work of administration and teachers, the usefulness and relevance of knowledge (including the list of studied technologies), technical support, Community of students and graduates, the opportunity to engage in scientific activities, financial efficiency, cooperation with IT companies and employment assistance.
For the Naukma, the lowest level of corruption was recorded - none of the respondents came across bribes personally.
57% of the surveyed graduates and students of Naukma said they would not have changed the place of training if they could choose again (VS 36% in the overall sample).
KNU them. Shevchenko
The KNU survey presents mainly two faculties: the Faculty of Cybernetics and the Faculty of Radiophysics, Electronics and Computer Systems (formerly Radiophysical).
Faculty of Cybernetics Assessed as a more prestigious, giving more relevant and useful for work in IT knowledge (including a wider list of studied technologies), which is more often attracting IT professionals for teaching.
On the other hand, students and graduates Faculty of Radiophysics, Electronics and Computer Systems Above the work of the administration (orientation on the interests of students), consider the training program more complex and interesting, the involvement of students in research activities are assessed above, and also talk about a strictest attitude to writing and plagiarism. At the faculty of radiophysics, electronics and computer systems, a rather low level of corruption is also noted - none of the respondents faced bribes at the faculty personally, compared with 8% at the Faculty of Cybernetics and 39% as a whole on the sample.
HNURE
HNURE, together with KNU and CHSU, ranks second in the highlight rating with a readiness rating. Recommend the university as a place of study 7.3 out of 10.
At the same time, on Faculty of Computer Engineering and Management more high level The involvement of students in research work is however, a higher level of corruption, 66% of respondents faced with bribes personally (compared with 41% at the Faculty of Computer Science and 39% as a whole on the sample).
CHSU them. Peter Mogily
CHSU, together with KNU and HNURE, ranks second in the highlight rating with a readiness rating to recommend university as a place of study 7.2 out of 10.
The CU survey is almost fully represented by the Faculty of Computer Sciences.
Estimates of this faculty above average by most indicators, including cooperation with IT companies, employment assistance and the relevance of knowledge.
In particular, the level of study of various technologies at the Faculty of Computer Sciences ChGU is one of the highest among all universities and faculties, and the level of corruption at the faculty (5%) is one of the lowest and inferior to the Naukma.
Sumga
In the survey, the Sugar is almost completely represented by the Faculty of Electronics and Information Technologies.
In many ways, the university received estimates above average, but the image of the university is estimated by the average, and the complexity of learning is below average. At the same time, the relevance of knowledge is estimated above average, possibly due to the involvement of IT professionals and cooperation with IT companies in the field of employment.
The work of the administration, the understanding of the material of the material by teachers, technical support is well appreciated. Pretty high level of students' involvement in scientific activities. Also, the university received high assessments of financial efficiency - with a relatively low level of corruption (19% came across bribes personally compared to 39% on the sample as a whole).
LNU them. Franco.
In the survey, LNU is presented mainly by the faculty of applied mathematics and computer science.
At the Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, the high level of prestigidity and complexity of training, the faculty more often attracts to the teaching of IT specialists (for the university, in general, these estimates are average). Otherwise evaluation and university, and the faculty differ little from medium sample
The level of corruption in the university is below average: 29% faced bribes personally (VS 39% on the sample as a whole).
DNU. Potchara
The university generally received the average estimates, however, the Faculty of Applied Mathematics (about half of the respondents from the bottom) received high prepaid ratings to recommend him as a place of study (7.3 out of 10).
For most indicators, the faculty is valued average, so a high level of readiness is recommended caused, apparently, the prestige of the faculty and the complexity of learning.
At the same time, the technical support and financial efficacy of both the faculty and the university are generally estimated below average.
Lviv Polytechnic
Estimates of the university average. The work of the administration, namely the orientation for the interests of students, is estimated below - mainly "wines" of the Institute of Computer Technologies, Automation and Metrology.
Higher estimates received the Institute of Computer Sciences and Information Technologies - it is considered more prestigious, higher evaluated technological opportunities for training, attracting IT professionals for teaching and cooperation with IT companies, including employment assistance. At the Institute of Computer Technologies, Automation and Metrology, all these items are estimated on average or below the average level.
The level of corruption on these two faculties and in general in the Lviv polytechnic above average (57% of respondents faced with bribes personally vs 39% of the overall sample).
ONPU
The study of the onpa is presented in the main Institute of Computer Systems.
Estimates and faculties, and university are mostly medium. The following is estimated to be all related to technical support: the condition of the premises, technological opportunities for training, access to educational materials.
In addition, the financial effectiveness of the university is estimated below - but the level of corruption is higher (54% of respondents from this university faced with bribes personally vs 39% on average by sample).
At the same time, respondents from the onpa talk about fairly active cooperation with IT companies in the field of employment.
NTUU "KPI"
QPI estimates as a university as a whole are medium, but at different faculties, the situation may differ. Strong sides KPI as a university generally prestige, the complexity of learning and the strong community of students and graduates. Among the minuses are the work of administration and teachers, technical support and financial efficacy. The level of corruption in the university is below average.
There are three Faculties of the KPI, which are rated sufficiently high: this is the Physics and Technology Institute (FTI), the Faculty of Applied Mathematics (FPM) and the Institute of Applied Systemic Analysis (IPSA).
They were appreciated above average ready to recommend, and in many ways these faculties are similar to each other: for example, assessed as prestigious, difficult to teach and giving up-to-date and useful knowledge and professional connections. The level of corruption at these faculties is below average.
At the same time respondents with PTI More often consider schools interesting and higher, the work of the administration is assessed, namely the orientation for students' interests.
If we talk about teachers, then respondents with IPSA Above assess the quality of explanations and submission of material, and respondents with PTI - Practical experience and ability to explain the application of knowledge in practice. Besides PTI Above the level of student involvement in research activities.
On the FTI and IPSA Also more severe attitude to writing and plagiarism, the best access to educational materials, higher graduate assessments, these faculties are more often attracted to the teaching of IT professionals (for FPM. Estimates of all these items do not differ from the average).
At the same time, employment assistance assessments for all three faculties are almost the same and do not differ from the middle sample.
In addition to these three faculties, the study also highlighted the Faculty of Informatics and Computer Engineering (FIVT), the Heat and Power Plant (TEF) and the Faculty of Electronics (FEL).
W. FVT. Good assessments of the image and the complexity of learning. The level of corruption on the FVT is below average (27% VS 39% on average by sample), the faculty is actively cooperating with IT companies in the field of employment. However, the relevance of knowledge is estimated below the average, as well as the work of the administration, the work of teachers, attitudes towards writing and plagiarism, technical support and financial efficacy.
W. TEF and FEL. Low estimates of the image and the organization of the educational process (incl. bureaucracy), as well as technical support. Fel students are also below average assesses the relevance and usefulness of the knowledge gained to work in IT, here less often attract IT professionals to teach and less cooperate with IT companies in the field of employment. The TEF with this is a little better: the estimates are average, and the list of technology studied is wider - but below the level of students' involvement in scientific and technical activities and higher level of corruption.
Henu them. Karazin
Most university estimates do not differ from the middle sample. Above the average is the graduates community and the level of involvement in research activities. Also at the university more strict attitude towards writing and plagiarism.
NTU "KPI"
Most university estimates do not differ from the middle sample. Above average, the work of the administration was appreciated, namely the orientation for the interests of students. Also, according to respondents, and the university, and one of its most popular IT faculties - whale (computer and information technologies) - quite actively cooperate with IT companies in the field of employment.
However, respondents lowly evaluate the complexity of learning in the university and the technical condition of its premises.
Hai them. Zhukovsky
In many ways, the university is estimated average. At the same time, respondents from Hai more often answer that it is interesting to study here - perhaps it is due to high estimates of the work of teachers, technical support (including access to educational materials) and graduate communities.
The financial efficiency of the university is estimated above average - but also the level of corruption in the university above (55% personally faced with bribes VS 39% as a whole on the sample).
DonNTU
In the survey, the university is mainly represented by the Faculty of Computer Sciences and Technologies.
Respondents from DonNTU estimate the training program as complicated, and the knowledge gained is considered useful for work in IT. Also above average, the understanding of the explanation and filing of the material by teachers is estimated.
At the same time, according to the respondents, the university cooperates little with IT companies in the field of employment. Below is the technical condition of the university's premises, the involvement of students in research activities, as well as the financial efficiency of the university - along with this, the level of corruption in DonNTU above average (54% personally faced with bribes VS 39% as a whole).
VNTU
In the survey, VNTU is presented mainly by the Faculty of Information Technologies and Computer Engineering.
The university and faculty are one of the rating outsiders: willingness to recommend them as a place of learning below average. Below is the average estimated almost all parameters of the assessment: the image of the university, the organization of the educational process, the usefulness and relevance of the knowledge, the complexity and interest of learning, the work of teachers, technical condition and financial efficacy.
The level of corruption in the ITU above the average: 75% of respondents from this university personally faced bribes during admission or during training (VS 39% in the whole sample).
Nau
In the poll of NAU presented in the main institution of computer information technologies. The university takes the last place at the level of readiness to recommend.
As in the case of VNTU, most of the rating parameters are estimated below the average: the image of the university, the work of the administration, the complexity and interest of learning, the relevance and usefulness of knowledge, the work of teachers, technical support, students and graduates community, financial efficiency. The level of corruption in Nau above average: 58% of respondents personally faced bribes (VS 39% as a whole on the sample).
In addition, according to respondents, NU is not actively cooperating with IT companies, including in the field of employment, rarely attracts to teaching practitioners from the IT industry.
Only 18% of the respondents from Nau would not be able to change the place of study, if they had such an opportunity - this is the lowest value among all universities, and two times lower than the average value (36%).
Methodology of conducting a survey
For analysis, the questionnaires of respondents with IT experience and learning experience in Ukrainian universities were selected (the availability of a diploma is optional).
A total of 3081 questionnaire was collected. For analysis, we selected universities and individual faculties for which 40 and more questionnaires were collected.
Description of the sample
38% of respondents - graduates 2011-2015, and 29% still learn: 
More than half of the respondents have a master's degree or specialist: 
67% of respondents work by developers, another 11% are occupied in QA:
Most IT professionals began to work in IT even during training at the university, mainly by 3-4 courses: 
The data are collected from the unified state base of education. The rating lists are not included by the highest military educational institutions (educational institutions with specific training conditions) and units of military educational institutions.
Table of Russian University Rating on the Middle Ball ZNO and Middle Carts Ball
| the name of the institution | Middle ball zno | Middle Point of Certificate on the budget |
| National University "Kiev-Mogilyanskaya Academy" | 186,57 | 10,87 |
| National Pharmaceutical University | 185,81 | 10,47 |
|
Lviv National medical University named after Danil Galitsky |
185,08 | 10,50 |
|
National Medical University named after A. A. Bogomolets |
184,53 | 10,65 |
|
Vinnitsa National Medical University. M. I. Pirogova |
183,97 | 10,58 |
| Kievsky national University named Taras Shevchenka | 183,61 | 10,62 |
|
Poltava Law Institute of the National Legal University named after Yaroslav Wise |
183,11 | 10,86 |
| National University "Odessa Legal Academy" | 182,48 | 10,54 |
|
National Law University named after Yaroslav Wise |
181,24 | 10,64 |
|
Dnipropetrovskaya medical Academy Ministry of Health of Ukraine |
179,43 | 10,25 |
| Kharkov National Medical University | 179,29 | 10,20 |
|
Kiev National Economic University named after Vadim Gapetman |
178,79 | 10,46 |
| Kiev National Linguistic University | 178,76 | 10,32 |
| National University "Ostrozhskaya Academy" | 178,56 | 10,55 |
|
Ternopil State Medical University named after I. Ya. Gorbachevsky |
178,30 | 10,38 |
| Odessa National Medical University | 178,11 | 10,25 |
| Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University | 178,05 | 10,32 |
| Bukovinsky State Medical University | 177,87 | 10,38 |
| Kiev National Trade and Economical University | 176,65 | 10,30 |
| Ukrainian Medical Dental Academy | 176,57 | 10,03 |
| Lviv National University named after Ivan Frank | 176,17 | 10,24 |
|
Kharkov National Economic University named after Seed Kuznez |
175,00 | 10,25 |
| Zaporizhia State Medical University | 174,88 | 10,01 |
|
Kharkov National Economic University named after V. N. Karazin |
174,39 | 10,15 |
| Odessa National University named after I. I. Mechnikov | 173,49 | 10,11 |
|
National Technical University of Ukraine "Kiev polytechnical Institute name Igor Sikorsky |
173,06 | 10,05 |
|
Kharkiv Institute of Finance of the Kiev National Trade and Economic University |
173,00 | 9,76 |
|
Institute of Management and Law National Legal University named after Yaroslav Wise |
172,67 | 10,50 |
|
Azov maritime Institute National University "Odessa Sea Academy" |
171,97 | 9,44 |
|
Odessa trade economic Institute Kiev National Commercial and Economic University |
171,67 | 10,60 |
| University of Banking | 171,29 | 10,09 |
|
Educational and Scientific Institute of Entrepreneurship and Prospective Technologies of the National University "Lviv Polytechnic" |
171,14 | 9,96 |
|
Cherkasy Educational Institute of Banking University |
170,79 | 9,51 |
| Kherson State Maritime Academy | 170,64 | 9,12 |
| Kiev University of Boris Greenschenka | 170,56 | 10,02 |
|
National Academy artistic art and architecture |
170,52 | 9,64 |
| Odessa National Economic University | 170,50 | 10,20 |
| Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics | 170,33 | 9,87 |
| Kiev National University of Culture and Arts | 169,77 | 9,78 |
| Donetsk National Medical University | 169,63 | 9,56 |
|
Krivoy Rog Economic Institute of the Kiev National Economic University named after Vadim Gapetman |
169,54 | 8,88 |
| National University "Lviv Polytechnic" | 169,45 | 9,85 |
|
National Academy of Guidelines of Culture and Arts |
169,27 | 9,75 |
| Kharkovskaya state Academy Design and art | 169,27 | 9,65 |
| Lviv National Academy of Arts | 168,76 | 9,56 |
| Donetsk National University named after Vasily Stus | 168,55 | 9,91 |
| National University "Odessa Maritime Academy" | 168,14 | 9,83 |
|
National pedagogical University named after M. P. Dragomanova |
167,60 | 9,94 |
|
Kievsky state Institute Decorative and Applied Art and Design named after Mikhail Boychuk |
167,12 | 9,57 |
| Lugansk State Medical University | 167,00 | 9,40 |
| Khmelnitsky University of Management and Law | 166,61 | 10,06 |
| Black Sea National University named after Peter Mogila | 166,59 | 9,49 |
| Dnieper National University named Olesya Potter | 166,55 | 9,67 |
| University of Customs and Finance | 166,35 | 9,84 |
|
Lviv branch of the Kiev National University of Culture and Arts |
165,97 | 9,60 |
|
Kharkov Training Institute of the University of Banking |
165,71 | 9,24 |
|
Vinnitsa Trade and Economic Institute of the Kiev National Trade and Economic University |
165,59 | 9,94 |
|
Kremenchuck Flight College of the National Aviation University |
165,50 | 9,20 |
|
Lviv Training Institute of the University of Banking |
165,40 | 9,57 |
|
Danube Institute of National University "Odessa Sea Academy" |
165,11 | 9,76 |
| Ternopil National Economic University | 164,64 | 9,75 |
|
Eastern European National University named after Lesia Ukrainka |
164,39 | 9,76 |
|
Kharkov National Pedagogical University named after G. S. Skin |
164,33 | 9,61 |
| Sumy state University | 163,85 | 9,27 |
| Tavria National University named after V. I. Vernadsky | 163,78 | 8,64 |
|
Kiev National University of Theater, Cinema and Television named after I. K. Karpenka-Karoy |
163,50 | 9,32 |
| Zhytomyr Basic Pharmaceutical College | 163,47 | 10,12 |
| State University of Telecommunications | 163,36 | 9,51 |
|
Chernivtsi National University named after Yuri Fedkovich |
163,13 | 10,01 |
| National aviation University | 162,42 | 9,62 |
| Flight Academy of National Aviation University | 162,10 | 9,75 |
|
Carpathian National University named after Vasily Stefanic |
161,67 | 9,83 |
| Kiev Children's Academy of Arts | 161,43 | 9,56 |
|
Vinnitsa State Pedagogical University named after Mikhail Kotsjubinsky |
161,04 | 9,84 |
| Uzhgorod National University | 160,72 | 9,75 |
|
Cherkasy National University named after Bogdan Khmelnitsky |
160,65 | 9,33 |
| Odessa National Pol. technical University | 160,62 | 9,45 |
| National University of Food Technologies | 160,54 | 9,59 |
| Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture | 160,47 | 9,61 |
| Zaporizhia National University | 160,32 | 9,38 |
|
National Music Academy of Ukraine named after P. I. Tchaikovsky |
160,09 | 9,17 |
|
Ivano-Frankivsk Educational and Scientific Institute of Management of the Ternopil National Economic University |
159,56 | 7,92 |
|
Ternopil National Pedagogical University named after Vladimir Gnatyuk |
159,46 | 9,66 |
|
Yuzhnoukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky |
159,15 | 9,44 |
|
Kharkov Trade and Economic Institute of the Kiev National Trade and Economic University |
159,02 | 9,57 |
|
Drohobych State Pedagogical University named after Ivan Frank |
158,49 | 9,49 |
| Transcarpathian Academy of Arts | 157,83 | 9,72 |
| Lviv Institute of Economics and Tourism | 157,62 | 9,41 |
| Kharkiv State Academy of Culture | 157,56 | 9,13 |
|
National aerospace University them. M.E. Zhukovsky "Kharkovsky aviation Institute" |
157,47 | 9,24 |
|
Lviv Institute of Nursing and Laboratory Medicine named after Andrei Krupinsky |
157,42 | 9,57 |
|
Chernovetsky Trade and Economic Institute of the Kiev National Trade and Economic University |
157,38 | 9,93 |
| Kharkiv State Zoozaterinarian Academy | 157,05 | 9,09 |
|
National University of Bioresources and Natural Management of Ukraine |
157,03 | 9,39 |
|
Kharkov National University construction and architecture |
156,71 | 9,38 |
|
National Technical University "Kharkov Polytechnic Institute" |
156,65 | 9,24 |
|
National Technical University "Dniprovskaya Polytechnic" |
156,47 | 9,16 |
| Ukrainian Academy of Printing | 156,41 | 9,17 |
|
Kiev National University of Technology and Design |
156,39 | 9,35 |
| Odessa National University | 156,37 | 9,37 |
|
National University of Physical education and Sports of Ukraine |
156,34 | 9,01 |
| Cherkasy Medical Academy | 156,24 | 8,91 |
|
Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas |
156,15 | 9,38 |
| Mariupol State University | 156,12 | 9,15 |
| Donetsk State University of Management | 155,94 | 9,07 |
|
Zhytomyr State University named after Ivan Frank |
155,78 | 9,35 |
|
Lviv National University veterinary medicine and biotechnologies named S. Z. Gzhitsky |
155,78 | 9,14 |
|
Lviv National Music Academy named after M. V. Lysenka |
155,54 | 9,08 |
| Rivne State Humanitarian University | 155,20 | 9,20 |
|
Kharkiv National University of Arts named after I. P. Kotlyarevsky |
154,94 | 8,92 |
|
Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenka |
154,75 | 8,70 |
| Vinnitsa National Technical University | 154,38 | 9,41 |
|
Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University named after Vladimir Vinnicheka |
154,24 | 9,01 |
|
Bettov O. M. Kharkiv National University of Urban Economy |
154,15 | 9,26 |
|
Novovolyn Educational and Scientific Institute of Economics and Management of the Ternopil National Economic University |
154,00 | 9,80 |
| Kherson National Technical University | 153,96 | 8,95 |
| Mukachevsky State University | 153,89 | 9,45 |
| Odessa National Communications Academy | 153,82 | 8,97 |
|
Poltava National Technical University named after Yuri Kondratyuk |
153,77 | 9,28 |
| Chernihiv National Technological University | 153,64 | 8,83 |
| Kharkiv State University of Food and Trade | 153,53 | 9,28 |
|
Chernihiv National Pedagogical University named after T. G. Shevchenka |
153,49 | 8,86 |
| Ukrainian State Chemical Technology University | 153,33 | 9,14 |
| Zhytomyr State Technological University | 153,07 | 9,10 |
|
Uman State Pedagogical University named after Pavel Tychina |
152,98 | 8,84 |
|
Dnipropetrovsk National University railway transport name of academician V. Lazarian |
152,97 | 9,16 |
|
Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V. Korolen |
152,94 | 9,19 |
| Kamanian-Podolsky national name Ivan Ogienka | 152,91 | 9,31 |
| Priazovsky State Technical University | 152,83 | 8,80 |
| Nezhinsky State University named after Nicholas Gogol | 152,80 | 8,92 |
| Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies | 152,78 | 9,32 |
| University of State Fiscal Service of Ukraine | 152,74 | 9,46 |
|
Vinnitsa Regional Communal Humanitarian Pedagogical College |
152,55 | 8,46 |
| National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit | 152,14 | 9,33 |
| Kherson State University | 151,99 | 8,96 |
| Cherkasy State Technological University | 151,88 | 8,60 |
| Khmelnitsky National University | 151,65 | 9,29 |
| Lviv State University physical culture | 151,41 | 8,50 |
|
Kremenchug National University named after Mikhail Ostogradsky |
150,96 | 8,80 |
| National Forestry University of Ukraine | 150,70 | 8,99 |
| Kiev Institute of Music named after R. M. Glier | 150,64 | 9,28 |
| National University of Water Management and Environmental Management | 150,32 | 8,88 |
|
Donetsk National University of Economics and Commerce named after Mikhail Tugan-Baranovsky |
150,23 | 8,28 |
|
Odessa National Music Academy named after A. V. Nezhdanova |
150,10 | 8,64 |
| Lutsk National Technical University | 149,95 | 9,16 |
| Zaporizhia National Technical University | 149,95 | 8,77 |
|
Uzhgorod Trade and Economic Institute of the Kiev National Trade and Economic University |
149,83 | 9,00 |
| Odessa State Academy of Construction and Architecture | 149,61 | 9,34 |
|
Pridneprovskaya State Academy of Construction and Architecture |
149,45 | 8,94 |
|
Nikolaev branch of the Kiev National University of Culture and Arts |
149,40 | 8,84 |
|
Ternopil National Technical University named after Ivan Puluya |
149,26 | 9,23 |
| Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture | 149,07 | 8,50 |
|
National University of Admiral Makarov Shipbuilding University |
148,89 | 8,03 |
| Belotserkovsky National agricultural University | 148,88 | 8,51 |
| Odessa State Environmental University | 148,87 | 8,56 |
| Odessa State Agrarian University | 148,77 | 8,80 |
|
Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bogdan Khmelnitsky |
148,72 | 8,82 |
| Krivoy Rod State Pedagogical University | 148,71 | 8,95 |
|
Nikolaev National University named after V. O. Sukhomlinsky |
148,58 | 8,84 |
| National Transport University | 147,35 | 8,94 |
|
Glukhovsky National Pedagogical University named after Alexander City |
147,33 | 8,16 |
| Rivne Medical Academy | 147,11 | 9,09 |
| Donbass State Engineering Academy | 146,99 | 8,37 |
| Krivoy Rog National University | 146,69 | 8,55 |
| Berdyansky State Pedagogical University | 146,62 | 8,83 |
| Khmelnitsky Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy | 146,62 | 8,93 |
| Donbass State Pedagogical University | 146,47 | 8,72 |
|
Chortkovsky Training Institute of Entrepreneurship and Business of the Ternopil National Economic University |
146,44 | 9,20 |
|
Eastern Ukrainian National University named after Vladimir Dalya |
146,15 | 8,44 |
| Poltava State Agrarian Academy | 146,14 | 8,78 |
|
Odessa State Academy of Technical Regulation and Quality |
146,11 | 8,43 |
|
Pereyaslav-Khmelnitsky State Pedagogical University named after Grigory Frying |
145,92 | 8,20 |
| State University of Infrastructure and Technology | 145,75 | 8,73 |
|
Kosovo Institute of Applied and Decorative Art of the Lviv National Academy of Arts. |
145,74 | 8,40 |
|
Kremenets Regional Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy named after Taras Shevchenka |
145,46 | 9,07 |
| Ishmail State Humanitarian University | 145,36 | 8,91 |
| Dnipro State Agrarian University | 145,27 | 8,74 |
| Kharkov Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy | 145,01 | 8,77 |
| Central Ukrainian National Technical University | 144,90 | 7,67 |
| Dnipro State Technical University | 144,77 | 8,11 |
| Horty National Scientific Rehabilitation Academy | 144,72 | 8,38 |
| Kiev Municipal Municipal Academy of Estain and Circus Arts | 144,28 | 8,40 |
| Lviv National Agrarian University | 143,27 | 8,65 |
| Kharkov National Auto-Road University | 143,24 | 8,16 |
| Sumy National Agrarian University | 143,15 | 8,08 |
|
Gorlovsky Institute foreign languages Donbass State Pedagogical University |
143,04 | 8,49 |
|
Educational and Scientific Professional Pedagogical Institute of the Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy |
143,00 | 7,30 |
| Zhytomyr National Agroecology University | 142,98 | 8,59 |
|
Pridneprovskaya State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports |
142,88 | 8,12 |
|
Faculty of market, information and innovative technologies Kiev National University of Technology and Design |
142,67 | 9,25 |
| National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine | 142,00 | 8,25 |
| Lugansk State Academy of Culture and Arts | 141,76 | 8,38 |
| Tavrician State Agricultural University | 141,62 | 8,27 |
| Donetsk National Technical University | 141,26 | 8,23 |
| Zhytomyr Medical Institute | 141,19 | 8,77 |
| Podolsk State Agricultural University | 140,64 | 8,49 |
|
Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchaev |
140,37 | 8,25 |
|
Kolomoisky Training Institute of the Carpathian National University named after Vasily Stefanic |
140,09 | 8,92 |
| Donbass National Academy of Construction and Architecture | 138,81 | 8,41 |
| Lugansk National Agrarian University | 139,81 | 7,93 |
|
Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport |
139,60 | 8,64 |
|
Lugansk National University named after Taras Shevchenko |
138,98 | 7,99 |
| Uman National University of Gardening | 138,89 | 8,11 |
| Vinnitsa National Agrarian University | 138,72 | 8,64 |
| Dnipropetrovsk Academy of Music named after M. Glinka | 138,60 | 8,53 |
| Konotop Institute of Sumy State University | 138,38 | 7,90 |
| Zaporizhzhya State Engineering Academy | 138,26 | 8,03 |
|
Chernovetsky Faculty of National Technical University "Kharkov Polytechnic Institute" |
137,22 | 8,29 |
| Lutsk Pedagogical College | 137,09 | 8,46 |
| Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy | 136,65 | 8,21 |
| Nikolaev National Agrarian University | 136,63 | 8,10 |
| Shostkinsky Institute of Sumy State University | 136,58 | 7,43 |
|
Kharkov National Technical University agriculture named Peter Vasilenka |
136,37 | 8,11 |
|
Pervomaisky branch of the National University of Shipbuilding named after Admiral Makarov |
136,33 | 7,92 |
|
Berezhansky Agrotechnical Institute of the National University of Bioresources and Environmental Management of Ukraine |
135,97 | 7,98 |
|
Institute of Chemical Technologies of the Eastern Ukrainian National University named after Vladimir Dalya |
134,33 | 7,53 |
|
Industrial Institute of Donetsk National Technical University |
134,00 | 8,33 |
| Vizhnitsky College of Applied Arts named after V. Yu. Shkriblyak | 133,50 | 9,13 |
| Academy of State Penitentiary Service | 132,51 | 7,71 |
| Kherson State Agrarian University | 132,40 | 7,30 |
| Kremenchuck Pedagogical College named after A. S. Makarenka | 131,24 | 8,12 |
| Umansky Humanitarian and Pedagogical College. T.G. Shevchenka | 131,00 | 8,40 |
|
Kherson branch of the National University of Shipbuilding named after Admiral Makarov |
130,73 | 7,09 |
|
Nezhinsky Agrotechnical Institute of the National University of Bioresources and Natural Management of Ukraine |
130,33 | 7,41 |
|
Podolsky Special Scientific Rehabilitation Socio-Economic College |
130,00 | 7,61 |
| Belotserkovsky Humanitarian Pedagogical College | 130,00 | 8,80 |
|
Krivoy Rog Metallurgical Institute of the National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine |
129,67 | 6,82 |
|
Lviv branch of the Dnepropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazarian |
127,81 | 8,07 |
|
Educational and Scientific Institute of Business and Hospitality of the Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade. M. Tugan-Baranovsky |
126,10 | 8,11 |
|
Sulechansky Institute of the National University of Water Management and Environmental Management |
122,11 | 8,00 |
|
Vinnitsa Educational and Scientific Institute of Economics of the Ternopil National Economic University |
121,33 | 7,63 |
And now with trepidation and very carefully choose higher educational institutionTo do and further get the highest quality education. The choice of profession is always a huge stress for graduates and their parents, I want to choose the best educational institution. Therefore, we cite the rating of universities of Ukraine 2016 to help in this difficult task.
Famous information educational resource "Oswita.ua" amounted to a large and overall rating of higher educational institutions of Ukraine of 2016. Calculations were carried out on the basis of the data of the most authoritative among experts and media of the Russian university ratings: "Top 200 Ukraine", "Scopus" and "Webometrix". Ratings are somewhat since each of the funds mass media and survey companies use various evaluation criteria for higher educational institutions. This means that the consolidated rating of universities of Ukraine 2016 will be the most complete and will allow you to get a full picture about universities, institutes and academies.
Consolidated Rating of Universities of Ukraine 2016
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
The table provides data from different sources that are integrated into the table. common characteristics The qualities of the university. This provides a visual understanding of the situation with the educational institutions of our country today. We hope that this rating of universities of Ukraine will help the applicants in choosing a place of study. Do not miss, soon let's notify what will be the passing score for 2016.
Main Corps of the National Technical University "Kiev Polytechnic Institute"
On July 11, the introductory campaign starts - this means that the applicant must submit statements to the selected universities. The statements form on the principle of priority when the number 1 registers the application to the most desired university, and then the lower number, the lower the priority of the university.
In the Ministry of Education, they are asked to closely take advantage of priority, change it after the start of the introductory campaign it will be impossible. The choice can be relying on university ratings, our own professional inclinations, level of preparation. To determine the industry that most matches your psychotica, you can take a professional orientation test from the global testing leader Hill International. At the same time, it should be understood that prestigious universities Competition will be tough, therefore a high assessment on external independent assessment (UKR. ZNO) is necessary. Systematize knowledge, repeat once again sophisticated topics Before the exam allows the format of online training courses for knowing on the Eduget platform, there can also be free of charge for the tests of the previous years.
Real ratings of universities will help finally decide on the priority of educational institutions. The euroosvita published the Top-200 Ukraine university rating for 2015/2016. Traditionally, the championship compete Ukrainian leaders higher education - KNU named after Taras Shevchenko and National Technical University of KPI. This year in the first place Tehnari.
KPI came forward by the criterion " Innovative activity Universities. " According to the head of the project "Top-200 Ukraine" Oley Linovitskaya, during last year Over 40 startups were created on the basis of the CPI, 29 of them were investments from private venture funds and technological companies 573 million UAH.
KNU named after Taras Shevchenko receives the most impressive budget financing of science - about 85 million UAH. He is ahead of the Ukrainian universities in the world ranking QS World University Rankings and in the base of Scopus scientific publications.
Below are Kharkov universities - in third place National University. V.N. Karazin, at the fourth National Technical University "Kharkov Polytechnic Institute". Fifth place at the National University "Lviv Polytechnic".
The project "Top 200 Ukraine" this year goes to the tenth time. This is an academic rating accredited by the International Expert Group on Ranking (IREG), its feature is compared with a multi-way university with the use of a universal criterion system. In fact, it is an attempt to introduce in the Ukrainian realities approaches of such rated leaders like Academic Ranking of World Universities (the so-called Shanghai Rating), The Times Higher Education World University Rankings and QS World University Rankings.
The activities of the university are estimated using an integrated index - from. This index includes three components:
INP - the quality index of scientific and pedagogical potential;
IO - the learning quality index;
Imp - international recognition index.
Given the recommendations of the latest Lisbon Forum, the IREG and modern educational trends, this year introduced the criterion "Innovative activities of universities". It was measured by the volume of investments made by private business in universities startups - not only the latest technical developments, but also projects in various fields human activitywho were based on newest ideas And they were in demand in the market. The result obtained is included in the INP - the quality index of scientific and pedagogical potential.
50 the best universities Ukraine 2015/2016
|
A place |
Higher educational institution |
Evaluation of the quality of scientific and pedagogical potential, INP |
Assessment of quality learning, IO |
Evaluation of international recognition, imp |
Assessment of the integral indicator of the activities of the university, from |
|
National Technical University of Ukraine "Kiev Polytechnic Institute" |
|||||
|
Kiev National University named after Taras Shevchenko |
|||||
|
Kharkiv National University named after V.N. Karazin |
|||||
|
National Technical University "Kharkov Polytechnic Institute" |
|||||
|
National University "Lviv Polytechnic" |
|||||
|
National Mining University |
|||||
|
National Medical University named after A. A. Bogomolets |
|||||
|
National University "Kiev-Mogilyanskaya Academy" |
|||||
|
Lviv National University named after Ivan Frank |
|||||
|
National University of Bioresources and Natural Management of Ukraine |
|||||
|
Dnipropetrovsk National University |
|||||
|
National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine |
|||||
|
Kiev National Economic University named after Vadim Gapetman |
|||||
|
National Aerospace University. N. E. Zhukovsky "Kharkov Aviation Institute" |
|||||
|
Sumy State University |
|||||
|
National Law University named after Yaroslav Wise |
|||||
|
Odessa National University named after I. I. Mechnikov |
|||||
|
National Pedagogical University named after M. P. Dragomanova |
|||||
|
National Aviation University |
|||||
|
National University of Food Technologies |
|||||
|
Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics |
|||||
|
National Pharmaceutical University |
|||||
|
Donetsk National Technical University |
|||||
|
Chernivtsi National University named after Yuri Fedkovich |
|||||
|
Vinnitsa National Technical University |
|||||
|
Odessa national politechnical University |
|||||
|
Kiev National University of Technology and Design |
|||||
|
Kiev National Trade and Economic University |
|||||
|
Vinnitsa National Medical University. N. I. Pirogova |
|||||
|
Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas |
|||||
|
Odessa National Economic University |
|||||
|
Donetsk National University |
|||||
|
National Forestry University of Ukraine |
|||||
|
Ternopil National Technical University named after Ivan Puluya |
|||||
|
Uzhgorod National University |
|||||
|
Kharkov National Medical University |
|||||
|
Eastern Ukrainian National University named after Vladimir Dalya |
|||||
|
Carpathian National University named after Vasily Stefanya |
|||||
|
National University "Odessa Legal Academy" |
|||||
|
Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies |
|||||
|
Ternopil National Economic University |
|||||
|
Odessa National Medical University |
|||||
|
Khmelnitsky National University |
|||||
|
Black Sea State University named after Peter Mogily |
|||||
|
University of Banking NBU |
|||||
|
Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture |
|||||
|
Zaporizhia National Technical University |
|||||
|
Kharkov National Economic University |
|||||
|
Lugansk National University named after Taras Shevchenko |
|||||
|
Yuzhnoukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky |