Navy in World War II. Navy on the eve of World War II. The pacific fleet of the ussr during the great patriotic war

The first part of the work on the French fleet in World War II. Covers the period up to the British Operation Threat against Dakar. The second part, published in Russian for the first time, describes the operations of the French fleet in remote areas, Operation Torch, the self-flooding of the fleet in Toulon and the revival of the fleet. The reader will also be interested in the applications. The book is written in a very biased way.

© Translated by I.P. Shmeleva

Original Russian Text © E.A. Granovsky. Comments to the 1st part, 1997

Original Russian Text © M.E. Morozov. Comments to the 2nd part

Original Russian Text © E.A. Granovsky, M.E. Morozov. Compilation and design, 1997

FOREWORD

The victory over fascism in World War II was the result of coalition actions. France took its rightful place among the victorious powers. But her path to the camp of the anti-Hitler coalition was tortuous. The fleet shared all the ups and downs with the country. A book by the French military historian L. Garros is about its history.

The material presented to the attention of readers is divided into two parts. This issue includes chapters on the actions of the French Navy in 1939-1940: the Norwegian and French campaigns, the actions of the fleet in the war with Italy, and then the battles with the British in Mers el-Kebir and Dakar. The second part of this book describes the events of 1941-1945: the armed conflict with Siam, actions off the coast of Syria in 1941, the Madagascar operation, the events associated with the North African landing of the allies and the history of the Free French naval forces.

The book of L. Garros is quite peculiar in some aspects. After reading it, you will surely notice a number of features.

Firstly, this is the French "specificity" of this work, which is unusual for our reader. L. Garros has a high opinion of Marshal Petain, he considers General de Gaulle almost a traitor, the history of the French Navy in World War II is reduced to him, in fact, to the history of the Vichy fleet, for which the naval forces of Free France were the enemy.

Secondly, the absence of a number of well-known episodes is puzzling. There is not a word in the book about the participation of French ships in the search for German raiders and interception of the blockade breakers, the convoy activity of the fleet is poorly reflected, the destroyer raid on Gibraltar in September 1940 and some other operations are not described, the outstanding successes of the Ruby submarine mine layer are ignored. ... But there are a lot of fictional victories and savoring, perhaps courageous, but did not have any impact on the course of the war actions. Sometimes the author almost slides into an openly adventurous genre, for example, describing the adventures of officer Boileambert, who does not know where and with whom he spent the night.

Part 1

THE FRENCH NAVY IN 1939

When the war broke out in September 1939, the French fleet consisted of seven battleships, including two old battleships Paris and Courbet, three old, but modernized in 1935-36. battleships - "Brittany", "Provence" and "Lorraine", two new battleships "Strasbourg" and "Dunkirk".

There were two aircraft carriers: the aircraft carrier Bearn and the Commandan Test aircraft.

There were 19 cruisers, of which 7 were class 1 cruisers - Duquesne, Tourville, Suffren, Colbert, Foch, Duplex and Algerie; 12 cruisers of the 2nd class - "Duguet-Truin", "La Mott-Piquet", "Primoget", "La Tour d" Auvergne "(formerly" Pluto ")," Jeanne d "Arc", "Emile Bertin", " La Galissonniere, Jean de Vienne, Gloire, Marseilles, Montcalm, Georges Leig.

The torpedo flotillas were also impressive. They numbered: 32 leaders

Six ships of the Jaguar, Gepar, Egl, Vauquelen, Fantask types and two Mogador types each; 26 destroyers - 12 of the Burrasque type and 14 of the Adrua type, 12 destroyers of the Melpomenes type.

The 77 submarines included the cruising submarine Surkuf, 38 class 1 submarines, 32 class 2 boats and 6 minelayers.

COMBAT ACTIONS FROM SEPTEMBER 1939 TO MAY 1940,

In September 1939, the disposition of the French fleet was mainly directed against Italy, although it was not specified how it would behave.

The British believed that the French fleet should guard the Strait of Gibraltar, while their fleet was almost completely concentrated in the North Sea against the Kriegsmarine. On September 1, Italy made it clear that it would not take any hostile action, and the French disposition was changed: the Mediterranean Sea became a secondary theater of operations, which did not present any obstacles to navigation. Convoys bringing troops from North Africa to the North-Eastern Front and the Middle East moved unhindered. The Anglo-French superiority at sea over Germany was overwhelming, especially since the latter was not ready to wage a naval war.

The Kriegsmarine command hoped that hostilities would begin no earlier than 1944. Germany had only two battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, three "pocket" battleships, five light cruisers, 50 destroyers, 60 submarines, of which only half were ocean-going

The total displacement of the ships of her fleet was only 1/7 of that of the allies.

By agreement with the British Admiralty, the French fleet assumed responsibility for operations off the French shores of the North Sea, then in the area south of the English Channel, as well as in the Bay of Biscay and in the western Mediterranean.

MEDITERRANEAN SEA

As it became more and more clear that Italy would enter the war, the ships of the Atlantic Fleet at the end of April 1940 assembled in the Mediterranean. They stood at the roadstead of Mers-el-Kebir under the command of Vice-Admiral Zhansul:

1st Squadron (Vice Admiral Zhansul) - 1st Battleship Division: Dunkirk (Captain 1st Rank Segen) and Strasbourg (Captain 1st Rank Colline); 4th division of cruisers (commander - Rear Admiral Burraguet): "Georges Leig" (captain 1st rank Barno), "Gloire" (captain 1st rank Broussignac), "Montcalm" (captain 1st rank de Corbières).

2nd Light Squadron (Rear Admiral Lacroix) - 6th, 8th and 10th Leadership Divisions.

2nd Squadron (Rear Admiral Buzen) - 2nd Battleship Division: Provence (Captain 1st Rank Barrois), "Brittany" (Captain 1st Rank Le Pivin); 4th division leaders.

4th squadron (commander - Rear Admiral Marks) - 3rd division of cruisers: "Marseiez" (captain 1st rank Amon), "La Galissoniere" (captain 1st rank Dupre), "Jean de Vienne" (captain 1st rank Missoff ).

JUNE Truce

While the described hostilities were going on, the government and the general staff were increasingly inclined to the idea of ​​the need to conclude a truce, since it was clear that further resistance was impossible. On June 10, the Admiralty evacuated its headquarters from Montenon to Er-et-Loire, 75 kilometers from Paris, and soon to Geritand, where there was a communications point; On June 17, following the incoming army, the admiralty moved to the castle of Dulamont near Marseille, on the 28th reached Nerac in the department of Lot-et-Garonne, and, finally, on July 6 it was in Vichy.

Starting on May 28, Admiral Darlan, foreseeing the worst, informed his subordinates that if hostilities ended in a truce, under which the enemy would demand the delivery of the fleet, he "did not intend to obey this order." Nothing could be clearer. This was expressed at the height of the evacuation from Dunkirk, when the British were feverishly embarking on ships. The fleet does not surrender. This was stated clearly, precisely, definitively.

At the same time, it was assumed that ships capable of continuing the fight would leave for England or even Canada. These were normal precautions in case the Germans requested the delivery of the fleet. Neither Prime Minister Paul Reynaud nor Marshal Petain thought for a moment to leave a fleet still capable of fighting to such a sad fate. Only a few ships were lost at Dunkirk - not too many for the sailors to lose the will to resist. The morale of the fleet was high, it did not consider itself defeated and did not intend to surrender. Subsequently, to one of his relatives, Admiral Darlan said: "If a truce is requested, I will end my career with a brilliant act of defiance." Later, his way of thinking changed. The Germans proposed as a condition of the armistice that the French fleet be interned at Spithead (England) or sunk. But in those days when the army's resistance was weakening and when it was clear that the winner would make his demands, and he could demand whatever he wanted, Darlan had a strong desire to keep the fleet. But how? Leave for Canada, America, England at the head of their squadrons?

ENGLAND AND THE FRENCH NAVY

By this term we mean all those operations that were deployed on July 3, 1940 against the French ships that took refuge in British ports, as well as those gathered in Mers el-Kebir and Alexandria.

England has always in its history attacked the naval forces of its enemies, friends and neutrals, which seemed to her too developed, and did not reckon with anyone's rights. The people, defending themselves in critical conditions, disdained international law. France always followed him, and in 1940, too

After the June armistice, French sailors were to be wary of the British. But they could not believe that the comradeship would be forgotten so quickly. England feared the transfer of Darlan's fleet to the enemy. If this fleet fell into the hands of the Germans, then the situation from critical would become disastrous for them. The assurances of Hitler, in the understanding of the British government, did not matter, and an alliance of France with Germany was quite possible. The British have lost their cool

  1. Friends, I suggest this topic. We replenish with photos and interesting information.
    The theme of the Navy is close to me. For 4 years he studied as a schoolboy at KYUMRP (Club of Young Sailors, Rechnikov and Polar workers). Fate did not connect with the fleet, but I remember these years. And the father-in-law turned out to be quite by accident a submariner. I'll start, and you help.

    On March 9, 1906, a decree was issued "On the classification of military ships of the Russian Imperial Navy." It was by this decree that the submarine forces of the Baltic Sea were created with the basing of the first submarine formation at the Libava naval base (Latvia).

    Emperor Nicholas II "deigned to command the highest order" to include "messenger ships" and "submarines" in the classification. The text of the decree listed 20 names of submarines built by that time.

    By order of the Russian Naval Department, submarines were declared an independent class of ships in the fleet. They were called "hidden ships".

    In the domestic submarine shipbuilding, non-nuclear and nuclear submarines are conventionally divided into four generations:

    First generation submarines for their time were an absolute breakthrough. However, they retained the solutions for electric power supply, general ship systems, traditional for the diesel-electric fleet. It was on these projects that hydrodynamics was worked out.

    Second generation endowed with new types of nuclear reactors and electronic equipment. Also characteristic feature the optimization of the shape of the hull for the underwater course, which led to an increase in the standard speeds of the underwater course up to 25-30 knots (two projects even have more than 40 knots).

    Third generation has become more perfect in terms of both speed and stealth. The submarines were distinguished by a large displacement, more advanced weapons and better habitability. For the first time, equipment for electronic warfare was installed on them.

    Fourth generation significantly increased the strike capabilities of submarines, and increased their stealth. In addition, electronic weapons systems are being introduced, which will allow our submarines to detect the enemy earlier.

    Now design bureaus are developing fifth generations submarines.

    On the example of various projects - "champions", marked with the epithet "the most", one can trace the features of the main stages of development of the Russian submarine fleet.

    MOST COMBAT:
    Heroic "Pikes" during the Great Patriotic War

  2. Messages are merged, 21 Mar 2017, time of first edit 21 Mar 2017

  3. The nuclear submarine missile cruiser K-410 "Smolensk" is the fifth ship of project 949A, code "Antey", (according to NATO classification - Oscar-II) in a series of Soviet and Russian nuclear submarine missile cruisers (APRK) armed with cruise missiles P-700 Granit and designed to destroy aircraft carrier strike formations. The project is a modification of 949 "Granite".
    In 1982-1996, 11 ships were built out of 18 planned, one K-141 Kursk was lost, the construction of two (K-139 and K-135) was mothballed, the rest canceled.
    The cruising submarine "Smolensk" under the name K-410 was laid down on December 9, 1986 at the Sevmash plant in the city of Severodvinsk under the serial number 637. Launched on January 20, 1990. Commissioned on December 22, 1990. On March 14, 1991 it entered the Northern Fleet. Has board number 816 (1999). Home port Zaozersk, Russia.
    Main characteristics: Displacement above water 14700 tons, underwater 23860 tons. The longest length at design waterline is 154 meters, the width of the hull is 18.2 meters, the average draft at design waterline is 9.2 meters. Surface speed 15 knots, underwater speed 32 knots. The working depth of immersion is 520 meters, the maximum immersion depth is 600 meters. The sailing endurance is 120 days. The crew is 130 people.

    Powerplant: 2 nuclear reactors OK-650V with a capacity of 190 MW each.

    Armament:

    Torpedo-mine armament: 2x650-mm and 4x533-mm TA, 24 torpedoes.

    Missile armament: anti-ship missile complex P-700 "Granit", 24 missiles ZM-45.

    In December 1992, she received the Navy Commander's Prize for firing long-range cruise missiles.

    On April 6, 1993, it was renamed "Smolensk" in connection with the establishment of patronage over the submarine by the administration of Smolensk.

    In 1993, 1994, 1998 he won the Navy Commander's Prize for missile firing at sea targets.

    In 1995 he made an autonomous military service to the shores of Cuba. During autonomy, in the Sargasso Sea area, an accident occurred in the main power plant, the consequences were eliminated by the crew without losing secrecy and using security measures in two days. All the assigned tasks of the combat service were completed successfully.

    1996 - autonomous combat service.

    In June 1999 he took part in the West-99 exercise.

    In September 2011, he arrived at Zvezdochka CS to restore technical readiness.

    In August 2012, the building berth stage of repairs was completed at the APRK: on August 5, 2012, a dock operation was carried out to launch the ship. The final stage of work was carried out afloat at the outfitting embankment.

    On September 02, 2013, at the Zvezdochka dock, during pressure testing of the main ballast tank of the boat, the pressure cap of the Kingston was torn off. No harm done. On December 23, after the completed repair, the APRK went to sea to fulfill the program of factory sea trials. During the repair on the cruiser, the technical readiness of all the ship's systems was restored, including the mechanical part, electronic weapons, hull structures and the main power plant. The submarine's reactors were recharged and the weapons complex was repaired. The service life of the submarine missile carrier was extended by 3.5 years, after which it is planned to begin work on a deep modernization of the ship. According to a report dated December 30, he returned to the main base of Zaozersk (Murmansk region), having made a transition to his home base from the city of Severodvinsk (Arkhangelsk region), where he underwent repairs and modernization at the Zvezdochka defense shipyard.

    In June 2014, in the White Sea, APRK, together with the rescuers of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, took part in the rescue of the boat "Barents". In September, the cruiser took part in tactical exercises of the diverse forces of the Northern Fleet.

    Favorite of the nation

    The Third Reich knew how to create idols. One of these poster idols created by propaganda was undoubtedly the hero-submariner Gunther Prin. He had the perfect biography of a popular guy who made a career out of the new government. At the age of 15, he was hired as a cabin boy on a merchant ship. He achieved a captain's diploma solely thanks to his hard work and natural intelligence. During the Great Depression, Prien was unemployed. After the Nazis came to power, the young man voluntarily entered the reviving Navy as an ordinary sailor and rather quickly managed to prove himself with the best side... Then there were studies at a privileged school for submariners and the war in Spain, in which Prien already participated as a submarine captain. In the first months of World War II, he immediately managed to achieve good results, sinking several English and French ships in the Bay of Biscay, for which he was awarded the 2nd degree Iron Cross from the commander of the naval forces, Admiral Erich Raeder. And then there was a fantastically audacious attack on the largest British battleship Royal Oak in the main base of the British Navy, Scapa Flow.

    For the accomplished feat, the Fuhrer awarded the entire U-47 crew with the Iron Cross of the 2nd degree, and the commander himself was honored to receive the Knight's Cross from Hitler's hands. However, according to the recollections of people who knew him at that time, the glory did not spoil Pryn. In communicating with his subordinates and acquaintances, he remained the same caring commander and charming guy. For a little more than a year, the underwater ace continued to create his own legend: cheerful reports about the exploits of U-47 appeared almost weekly in the film releases of Dr. Goebbels' favorite brainchild, Die Deutsche Wochenchau. Ordinary Germans really had something to admire: in June 1940, German boats sank 140 ships from Allied convoys in the Atlantic with a total displacement of 585,496 tons, of which about 10% were by Prine and his crew! And then suddenly everything quieted down at once, as if there was no hero. For quite a long time, official sources did not report anything at all about Germany's most famous submariner, but it was impossible to hush up the truth: on May 23, 1941, the naval command officially recognized the loss of the U-47. She was sunk on March 7, 1941 on the way to Iceland by the British destroyer Wolverine ("Wolverine"). The submarine, waiting for the convoy, surfaced next to the guard destroyer and was immediately attacked by it. Having received minor damage, U-47 lay on the ground, hoping to lie down and escape unnoticed, but due to the damage to the propeller, the boat, trying to sail, created a terrible noise, hearing which the Wolverine hydroacoustics initiated a second attack, as a result of which the submarine was finally sunk, thrown with depth charges ... However, the most incredible rumors about Prine and his sailors spread for a long time in the Reich. In particular, it was rumored that he did not die at all, but that he had raised a riot on his boat, for which he ended up either in a penal battalion on the Eastern Front, or in a concentration camp.

    First blood

    The first victim of a submarine in World War II is considered to be the British passenger liner "Athenia", torpedoed on September 3, 1939, 200 miles from the Hebrides. As a result of the U-30 attack, 128 crew members and passengers of the liner, including many children, were killed. And yet, for the sake of objectivity, it should be admitted that this barbaric episode is not very typical for the first months of the war. At the initial stage, many commanders of German submarines tried to comply with the terms of the 1936 London Protocol on the rules of conducting submarine warfare: first, on the surface, stop a merchant ship and disembark a search team on board for a search. If, according to the terms of the prize law (a set of international legal norms regulating the seizure of merchant ships and cargo at sea by the belligerent countries), the sinking of a ship was allowed due to its apparent belonging to the enemy's fleet, the submarine's team waited for the sailors from the transport to transfer to lifeboats and go to a safe distance from the doomed ship.

    However, very soon the warring parties stopped playing gentlemen: the commanders of the submarines began to report that the single ships they encountered were actively using the artillery pieces installed on their decks or immediately broadcast a special signal about the detection of the submarine - SSS. And the Germans themselves were less and less eager to breed politeness with the enemy, trying to end the war that had begun favorably for them as soon as possible.
    Submarine U-29 (Captain Schuhard) achieved great success on September 17, 1939, attacking the aircraft carrier Koreyges with a three-torpedo salvo. For the British Admiralty, the loss of a ship of this class and 500 crew members was a big blow. So the debut of German submarines as a whole turned out to be very impressive, but it could have become even more painful for the enemy, if not for the constant failures when using torpedoes with magnetic fuses. By the way, practically all the participants experienced technical problems at the initial stage of the war.

    Breakthrough in Scapa Flow

    If the loss of an aircraft carrier in the very first month of the war was a very sensitive blow for the British, then the event that occurred on the night of October 13-14, 1939, was already a knockdown. The planning of the operation was personally supervised by Admiral Karl Doenitz. At first glance, the anchorage of the Royal Navy ships in Scapa Flow seemed completely impregnable, at least from the sea. There were strong and treacherous currents here. And the approaches to the base were guarded around the clock by patrolmen, covered with special anti-submarine nets, boom barriers, and flooded ships. And nevertheless, thanks to detailed aerial photographs of the area and data obtained from other submarines, the Germans still managed to find one loophole.

    A responsible mission was assigned to the U-47 and its successful commander Gunther Prien. On the night of October 14, this boat, having passed a narrow strait, crept through an accidentally left open boom barrier and thus ended up in the main roadstead of the enemy base. Prien made two surface torpedo attacks against two English ships at anchor. The battleship Royal Oak, a modernized WWI veteran with a displacement of 27,500 tons, exploded and sank with 833 crew members, and Admiral Blangrove on board was also killed. The British were taken by surprise, they decided that the base was attacked by German bombers, and opened fire in the air, so that U-47 safely escaped retaliation. Returning to Germany, Prin was greeted as a hero and awarded the Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves. After his death, his personal emblem "Scapa Flow Bull" became the emblem of the 7th Flotilla.

    Loyal Lion

    The successes achieved during the Second World War, the German submarine fleet owes much to Karl Doenitz. Himself a former commander of a submarine, he perfectly understood the needs of his subordinates. The admiral personally met each submarine returning from a military campaign, organized special sanatoriums for crews exhausted by many months at sea, and attended the graduations of the submariners' school. The sailors behind the backs called their commander "daddy Karl" or "Lion". In fact, Doenitz was the engine of the revival of the Third Reich's submarine fleet. Soon after the signing of the Anglo-German agreement, which lifted the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles, he was appointed by Hitler "Fuehrer of submarines" and led the 1st submarine flotilla. In his new position, he had to face active opposition from the supporters of large ships from the leadership of the Navy. However, the talent of a brilliant administrator and political strategist has always allowed the chief of submariners to lobby the interests of his department in the highest state spheres. Doenitz was one of the few staunch National Socialists among the senior naval officers. The admiral used every opportunity presented to him to publicly praise the Fuhrer.

    Once, speaking in front of Berliners, he was so carried away that he began to assure the audience that Hitler foresaw a great future for Germany and therefore could not be mistaken:

    "We are worms by comparison!"

    In the first years of the war, when the actions of his submariners were extremely successful, Doenitz enjoyed the full confidence of Hitler. And soon his finest hour came. This take-off was preceded by very tragic events for the German fleet. By the middle of the war, the pride of the German fleet - heavy ships such as "Tirpitz" and "Scharnhost" - actually turned out to be neutralized by the enemy. The situation demanded a radical change of landmarks in the war at sea: to replace the "batch of battleships" a new team was to come, professing the philosophy of large-scale submarine warfare. After the retirement of Erich Raeder on January 30, 1943, Doenitz was appointed as his successor as Commander-in-Chief of the German Navy with the title of "Grand Admiral". And two months later, the German submariners achieved record figures, sending 120 Allied ships with a total tonnage of 623,000 tons to the bottom during March, for which their chief was awarded the Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves. However, the period of great victories was drawing to a close.

    Already in May 1943, Doenitz was forced to withdraw his boats from the Atlantic, fearing that soon he would have nothing to command. (By the end of this month, the grand admiral could have summed up terrible results for himself: 41 boats and more than 1,000 submariners were lost, among whom was the youngest son of Doenitz, Peter.) This decision infuriated Hitler, and he demanded that Doenitz cancel the order while declaring: “There can be no question of ending the participation of submarines in the war. The Atlantic is my first line of defense in the west. " By the fall of 1943, the Germans had to pay with one of their own boats for every sunken Allied ship. In the last months of the war, the admiral was forced to send his people to almost certain death. And yet he remained loyal to his Fuehrer to the very end. Before taking his own life, Hitler appointed Doenitz as his successor. On May 23, 1945, the new head of state was captured by the Allies. At the Nuremberg trials, the organizer of the German submarine fleet managed to escape responsibility on charges of issuing orders according to which his subordinates shot sailors who escaped from torpedo ships. The admiral received his ten-year term for fulfilling Hitler's orders, according to which the captured crews of British torpedo boats were transferred for execution by the SS. After his release from West Berlin's Spandau prison in October 1956, Doenitz began writing his memoirs. The admiral died in December 1980 at the age of 90. According to the testimony of people who knew him closely, he always kept a folder with letters from officers of the Allied fleets, in which former opponents expressed their respect to him.

    Drown everyone!

    “It is forbidden to make any attempt to rescue the crews of sunken ships and vessels, transfer them to lifeboats, return inverted boats to their normal position, supply the injured with provisions and water. Rescue contradicts the very first rule of warfare at sea, requiring the destruction of enemy ships and their teams, ”- this order from Doenitz was received by the commanders of German submarines on September 17, 1942. Later, the grand admiral motivated this decision by the fact that any generosity shown to the enemy is too expensive for his people. He referred to the Laconia incident five days before the order was issued, that is, on 12 September. Having sunk this British transport, the commander of the German submarine U-156 raised the Red Cross flag on his bridge and began to rescue the sailors in the water. A message was broadcast from U-156 on the international wave several times that the German submarine was carrying out rescue operations and guaranteed complete safety to any vessel ready to take on board sailors from the sunken steamer. Nevertheless, after some time, U-156 attacked the American Liberator.
    Then air attacks began to follow one after another. The boat miraculously managed to avoid death. Hot on the heels of this incident, the German command of the submarine forces has developed extremely tough instructions, the essence of which can be expressed in a laconic order: "Take no prisoners!" However, it cannot be argued that it was after this incident that the Germans were forced to "take off their white gloves" - cruelty and even atrocities have long become commonplace in this war.

    In January 1942, German submarines began to be supplied with fuel and supplies from special cargo underwater tankers, the so-called "milk cows", which, among other things, were carrying a repair team and a naval hospital. This made it possible to transfer active hostilities to the very coast of the United States. The Americans turned out to be completely unprepared for the war to come to their shores: for almost six months, Hitler's submarine aces hunted with impunity for single ships in the coastal zone, shooting brightly lit cities and factories from artillery guns at night. Here is what one American intellectual, whose house overlooked the ocean, wrote about this: “The view of the boundless sea space, which used to be so inspiring for life and creativity, now makes me sad and terrified. Fear penetrates me especially strongly at night, when it is impossible to think about anything more than about these calculating Germans choosing where to send a shell or a torpedo ... "

    Only by the summer of 1942, the US Air Force and Navy managed to jointly organize a reliable defense of their coast: now dozens of aircraft, ships, airships and private speed boats were constantly monitoring the enemy. The US 10th Fleet organized special "assassin groups", each of which included a small aircraft carrier, equipped with attack aircraft, and several destroyers. Patrolling by long-range aircraft equipped with radars capable of detecting antennas and snorkels of submarines, as well as the use of new destroyers and Hedgehog naval bombers with powerful depth charges, changed the balance of forces.

    In 1942, German submarines began to appear in polar waters off the coast of the USSR. With their active participation, the Murmansk convoy PQ-17 was destroyed. Of its 36 transports, 23 were killed, while 16 sank submarines. And on April 30, 1942, the U-456 submarine knocked out the English cruiser Edinburgh with two torpedoes, sailing from Murmansk to England with several tons of Russian gold to pay for Lend-Lease deliveries. The cargo lay at the bottom for 40 years and was lifted only in the 80s.

    The first thing that the submariners who had just put out to sea faced was the terrible cramped conditions. Especially this suffered the crews of the series VII submarines, which, being already cramped in design, were, in addition, packed to capacity with everything necessary for long voyages. The crew's berths and all the free corners were used to store food crates, so the crew had to rest and eat wherever they could. To take additional tons of fuel, it was pumped into tanks designed for fresh water(drinking and hygienic), thus drastically reducing her diet.

    For the same reason, German submariners never rescued their victims, desperately floundering in the middle of the ocean.
    After all, there was simply nowhere to place them - except to shove them into the freed torpedo tube. Hence the reputation of inhuman monsters entrenched in the submariners.
    The feeling of mercy was also dulled by constant fear for his own life. During the campaign, one had to constantly be wary of minefields or enemy aircraft. But the most terrible were enemy destroyers and anti-submarine ships, or rather, their depth charges, a close explosion of which could destroy the hull of the boat. At the same time, one could only hope for a quick death. It was much more terrible to receive heavy damage and irrevocably fall into the abyss, listening in horror as the compressible hull of the boat crackles, ready to break through in streams of water under a pressure of several tens of atmospheres. Or worse, forever go aground and slowly suffocate, realizing that there will be no help ...

    Wolf hunt

    By the end of 1944, the Germans had already finally lost the "Battle of the Atlantic". Even the latest XXI series boats, equipped with a snorkel, a device that allows a significant amount of time not to float to recharge batteries, discharges exhaust gases and replenishes oxygen, could no longer change anything (the snorkel was also used on submarines of earlier series, but not very successfully). The Germans managed to make only two such boats, having a speed of 18 knots and diving to a depth of 260 m, and while they were on alert duty, the Second World War ended.

    Countless Allied aircraft equipped with radars were constantly on duty in the Bay of Biscay, which became a veritable graveyard of German submarines leaving their French bases. Reinforced concrete shelters, which became vulnerable after the British developed the 5-ton Tallboy concrete-piercing bombs, turned into traps for submarines, from which only a few managed to escape. In the ocean, submarine crews were often pursued for days by air and sea hunters. Now the "Doenitz wolves" were less and less likely to attack well-protected convoys and were increasingly concerned with the problem of their own survival under the maddening impulses of search sonars, methodically "probing" the water column. Often, the Anglo-American destroyers did not have enough casualties, and they pounced on any submarine they found with a pack of hounds, literally bombarding it with depth charges. Such, for example, was the fate of U-546, which was simultaneously bombed by eight American destroyers! Until recently, the formidable German submarine fleet was not rescued by either perfect radars or enhanced booking, and new homing acoustic torpedoes and anti-aircraft weapons did not help. The situation was aggravated by the fact that the enemy had been able to read German ciphers for a long time. But the German command until the very end of the war was fully confident that the codes of the Enigma encryption machine could not be broken! Nevertheless, the British, having obtained the first sample of this machine from the Poles in 1939, by the middle of the war created an effective system for decrypting enemy messages under the code name "Ultra", including the world's first electronic computing machine "Colossus". And the most important "gift" the British received on May 8, 1941 during the capture of the German submarine U-111 - they got into their hands not only a serviceable car, but also the entire set of documents of covert communication. From that time on, for German submariners, going on the air for the purpose of transmitting data was often tantamount to a death sentence. Apparently, at the end of the war, Doenitz guessed about this, as he once wrote in his diary lines full of helpless despair: “The enemy holds a trump card, covers all areas with long-range aviation and uses detection methods for which we are not ready. The enemy knows all our secrets, but we know nothing about their secrets! "

    According to official German statistics, out of 40 thousand German submariners, about 32 thousand people died. That is, many more than every second!
    After Germany's surrender, most of the submarines captured by the Allies were sunk during Operation Lethal Fire.

  4. Imperial Japanese Navy Submarine Carriers

    During World War II, the Japanese navy had large submarines capable of transporting up to several light seaplanes (similar submarines were also built in France).
    The aircraft were kept folded in a special hangar inside the submarine. Takeoff was carried out on the surface of the boat, after the aircraft was removed from the hangar and assembled. On the deck in the bow of the submarine there were special short-launch catapult runners, from which the plane rose into the sky. After the completion of the flight, the aircraft splashed down and was removed back to the boat's hangar.

    In September 1942, a Yokosuka E14Y aircraft, taking off from an I-25 boat, raided Oregon (USA), dropping two 76-kg incendiary bombs, which were supposed to cause extensive fires in the forest, which, however did not happen and the effect was negligible. But the attack had a great psychological effect, since the method of attack was not known.
    This was the only case of a bombing of the continental United States in the entire war.

    The I-400 type submarines (伊 四 〇〇 型 潜水 艦), also known as the Sentoku or STo type, are a series of Japanese diesel-electric submarines from the Second World War. Designed in 1942-1943 for the role of ultra-long-range submarine aircraft carriers for operations anywhere in the world, including off the coast of the United States. The submarines of the I-400 type were the largest among those built during the Second World War and remained so until the appearance of the nuclear submarine.

    Initially, it was planned to build 18 submarines of this type, but in 1943 this number was reduced to 9 ships, of which only six were started, and only three were completed, in 1944-1945.
    Due to the late construction, submarines of the I-400 type were never used in combat. After the surrender of Japan, all three submarines were transferred to the United States, and in 1946 they were sunk by them.
    The history of the I-400 began shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, when, at the direction of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, the development of the concept of a submarine aircraft carrier for strikes along the US coast began. The Japanese shipbuilders already had experience of deploying one reconnaissance seaplane on several classes of submarines, but the I-400 had to be equipped with a large number of heavier aircraft to fulfill the tasks assigned to them.

    On January 13, 1942, Yamamoto sent the I-400 project to the naval command. It formulated the requirements for the type: the submarine was supposed to have a cruising range of 40,000 nautical miles (74,000 km) and have on board more than two aircraft capable of carrying an aviation torpedo or an 800-kg aerial bomb.
    The first project of submarines of the I-400 type was presented in March 1942 and, after modifications, was finally approved on May 17 of the same year. On January 18, 1943, the construction of the lead ship of the series, I-400, began at the Kure shipyards. The original construction plan, adopted in June 1942, called for the construction of 18 boats of this type, but after the death of Yamamoto in April 1943, this number was halved.
    By 1943, Japan was beginning to experience serious difficulties in supplying materials, and plans for the construction of the I-400 type were reduced, at first to six boats, and then to three.

    The data given in the table are largely arbitrary, in the sense that they cannot be taken as absolute numbers. This is primarily due to the fact that it is rather difficult to accurately calculate the number of submarines of foreign states participating in hostilities.
    There are still discrepancies in the number of targets sunk. However, the given values ​​give a general idea of ​​the order of the numbers and their relationship to each other.
    This means that we can draw some conclusions.
    Firstly, Soviet submariners have the smallest number of sunk targets for each submarine participating in hostilities (the effectiveness of submarines is often assessed by the sunk tonnage. However, this indicator largely depends on the quality of potential targets, and in this sense, for the Soviet fleet it is Indeed, in the North the bulk of the enemy's transports consisted of small and medium tonnage vessels, and in the Black Sea such targets could be counted on one hand.
    For this reason, in the future, we will mainly talk simply about sunken targets, only highlighting among them warships). The next in terms of this indicator is the United States, but the real figure there will be much higher than the indicated one, since in fact only about 50% of submarines of the total number of submarines in the theater of operations took part in combat operations on communications, the rest performed various special tasks.

    Secondly, the percentage of submarines lost from the number of those who participated in hostilities Soviet Union almost twice as high as in other winning countries (Britain - 28%, USA - 21%).

    Thirdly, in terms of the number of sunk targets for each lost submarine, we surpass only Japan, and are close to Italy. The rest of the countries in this indicator surpass the USSR by several times. As for Japan, at the end of the war there was a real beating of its fleet, including the submarine, so its comparison with the victorious country is generally not correct.

    Considering the effectiveness of the actions of Soviet submarines, one cannot but touch upon one more aspect of the problem. Namely, the ratio of this efficiency to the funds that were invested in the submarines and the hopes that were placed on them. It is very difficult to assess the damage inflicted on the enemy in rubles, on the other hand, and the real labor and material costs for the creation of any product in the USSR, as a rule, did not reflect its formal cost. However, this issue can be considered indirectly. In the pre-war years, the industry handed over to the Navy 4 cruisers, 35 destroyers and leaders, 22 patrol ships and more than 200 (!) Submarines. And in monetary terms the construction of submarines was clearly a priority. Until the third five-year plan, the lion's share of appropriations for military shipbuilding went to the creation of submarines, and only with the laying of battleships and cruisers in 1939, the picture began to change. Such dynamics of financing fully reflects the views on the use of naval forces that existed in those years. Until the very end of the thirties, submarines and heavy aircraft were considered the main striking force of the fleet. In the third five-year plan, priority was given to large surface ships, but by the beginning of the war, it was submarines that remained the most massive class of ships, and if the main stake was not made on them, then great hopes were pinned.

    Summing up a small express analysis, it must be admitted that, firstly, the effectiveness of the actions of Soviet submarines during the Second World War was one of the lowest among the belligerent states, and even more so such as Great Britain, the USA, and Germany.

    Secondly, Soviet submarines clearly did not live up to the hopes and investments placed on them. As one example from a number of similar ones, we can consider the contribution of submarines to disrupting the evacuation of Nazi troops from the Crimea on April 9-May 12, 1944. In total, during this period, 11 submarines damaged one (!) Transport in 20 military campaigns.
    According to the reports of the commanders, several targets were allegedly sunk, but there was no confirmation of this. And it’s not very important. Indeed, in April and twenty days of May, the enemy led 251 convoys! And these are many hundreds of targets and with very weak anti-submarine security. A similar picture developed in the Baltic in the last months of the war during the mass evacuation of troops and civilians from the Courland Peninsula and from the Danzig Bay area. In the presence of hundreds of targets, including large-tonnage, often with completely conditional anti-submarine security in April-May 1945, 11 submarines in 11 military campaigns sank only one transport, a floating base and a floating battery.

    The most probable reason for the low efficiency of the actions of domestic submarines may lie in their very quality. However, in the domestic literature, this factor is swept aside immediately. You can find a lot of statements that Soviet submarines, especially type "C" and "K" were the best in the world. Indeed, if we compare the most common performance characteristics of domestic and foreign submarines, then such statements seem to be quite reasonable. The Soviet submarine of the "K" type surpasses foreign classmates in speed, in the range of navigation on the surface it is second only to the German submarine and has the most powerful weapons.

    But even when analyzing the most common elements, a lag is noticeable in the submerged cruising range, in the depth of immersion and in the speed of immersion. If you start to understand further, it turns out that the quality of submarines a huge impact It is not the elements that are recorded in our reference books that are usually subject to comparison (by the way, the depth of immersion and the speed of immersion are also not indicated here, as a rule), but others, directly related to new technologies. These include noise, shock resistance of devices and mechanisms, the ability to detect and attack the enemy in conditions of poor visibility and at night, stealth and accuracy of the use of torpedo weapons, and a number of others.

    Unfortunately, by the beginning of the war, domestic submarines did not have modern electronic detection equipment, torpedo automatic firing devices, bubbleless firing devices, depth stabilizers, radio direction finders, shock absorbers of devices and mechanisms, but they were distinguished by a high noise level of mechanisms and devices.

    The issue of communication with the submarine, which is in a submerged position, has not been resolved. Practically the only source of information about the surface situation of a submerged submarine was a periscope with very unimportant optics. The "Mars" type noise direction finders that were in service made it possible by ear to determine the direction to the noise source with an accuracy of plus or minus 2 degrees.
    The range of the equipment with good hydrology did not exceed 40 kb.
    The commanders of the German, British, American submarines had sonar stations at their disposal. They worked in the direction finding mode or in active mode, when the hydroacoustician could determine not only the direction to the target, but also the distance to it. German submariners, with good hydrology, detected a single transport in the noise direction finding mode at a distance of up to 100 kb, and already from a distance of 20 kb they could get a range to it in the "Echo" mode. Similar opportunities were available to our allies.

    And this is not all that directly influenced the effectiveness of the use of domestic submarines. In these conditions, the lack of technical characteristics and support for combat operations could be partially compensated for only by the human factor.
    Here, probably, lies the main determinant of the effectiveness of the domestic submarine fleet - Man!
    But the submariners, like no one else, objectively have a certain main person, a kind of God in a separately taken confined space. In this sense, a submarine is similar to an airplane: the entire crew may consist of highly qualified professionals and work exceptionally competently, but the commander has the helm and it will be him who will land the plane. Pilots, like submariners, usually either all come out victorious, or all die. Thus, the personality of the commander and the fate of the submarine are something whole.

    In total, over the years of the war, 358 people in the operating fleets acted as commanders of submarines, 229 of them participated in this position in military campaigns, 99 - died (43%).

    Having examined the list of commanders of Soviet submarines during the war, it can be stated that most of them had a rank corresponding to their position or one level lower, which is normal cadre practice.

    Consequently, the statement that by the beginning of the war, our submarines were commanded by inexperienced novices who took up positions thanks to the political repression, unreasonably. Another thing is that the rapid growth of the submarine fleet in the pre-war period demanded more officers than they graduated from schools. For this reason, a crisis of commanders arose, and it was decided to overcome it by drafting civilian sailors into the fleet. Moreover, it was believed that it was advisable to send them to submarines, since they know the psychology of the captain of a civil ship (transport) best, and this should facilitate their actions to combat shipping. This is how many sea captains, that is, people, in fact, not military, became commanders of submarines. True, they all studied at the appropriate courses, but if it is so easy to make submarine commanders, then why do we need schools and long-term studies?
    In other words, an element of serious disadvantage has already been incorporated into future performance.

    List of the most successful Russian submariners:

Questions and answers. Part I: World War II. Member countries. Army, weapons. Lisitsyn Fedor Viktorovich

Navy in World War II

Navy in World War II

> About the English fleet somehow thoughtless, you are right, this is power. However, there was also an Italian / German fleet. Couldn't you have secured routes across the Mediterranean?

The German navy as an organized force "put out" in 1940 in Norway and EVERYTHING. 1/3 of the losses of the ship's personnel participating in the operation, continuous repairs of the survivors. After that, he could only make separate raids. Not able to perform operations. Yes, and he was based in Norway and Gibraltar in the hands of England. The Italian fleet consisted of good and new ships, but the quality of the command staff of the Italians is simply ATAS. THEY lost all battles, even in their ideal environment. Once, 4 British Light cruisers fired from an Italian squadron into a battleship, a dozen cruisers (light and heavy) and a whole shobla of destroyers ... Shame, shame. There was little sense from the Italian fleet, although the sailors were brave, they fought to the end and did what they could. There was also a problem with the guns (on the British cruiser Orion, 37 volleys were fired by covering (that is, the sight is accurate) without a single hit - that is, the shells fell scattered due to technical defects.

> For example, three days of mourning was declared after the sinking of the liner "Wilhelm Gustlov".

Alas, this is a beautiful legend launched by Swedish journalists. After 1943, Hitler banned nationwide mourning - Germany simply did not Crawl out of them. But, for example, in the USSR, official mourning was declared for the deceased ally - President Roosevelt. In April 1945 ... Among the victorious fireworks, there was time to express condolences and organize wreaths for the American embassy. It was. This is a worthy example of mourning

> By the beginning of the Soviet-Japanese war (August 1945), the Pacific Fleet included two cruisers, a leader, 12 destroyers and destroyers, 78 submarines, 17 patrol ships, 10 minelayers, 70 minesweepers, 52 submarine hunter boats, 150 torpedo boats and more than 1,500 aircraft

Yes - only they were all occupied (they did not risk large ships at all - they took part in the operations starting with minesigns - cruisers and destroyers were in the "armed reserve"

As a result, the reconnaissance group was sent to land on Hokkaido by submarines. The Japanese capitulated in time - the first party (29 people) was already preparing to enter the "Land of Divine Mulberries".

> "Neher was to release a passenger hospital ship in the middle of the night at sea, and even under a military flag. Ardent greetings to the head of the port."

Now G. Grass also found confirmation that the "Gustloff" had artillery - 4 sparks 30mm ("Kugeli", not 37mm) anti-aircraft guns. So Marinesco was COMPLETELY in his right to drown - which is confirmed.

> I heard, of course. I believe, however, that our forces were insufficient to attack the islands. And I am not the master.

And we would attack them slowly. At the same time, from the southern Kuril islands (which we took) to the northernmost Japanese island (where the first bridgehead was planned) 14 km in a straight line. And we received enough landing craft under Lend-Lease.

> There were actually submariners there with a gulkin's nose, and they were raw submariners.

936 people, of which about 150 are personnel (non-commissioned officers and instructors). Yes, the submariners were the best to save themselves - about 400 died. But for the Germans, and that was bread - there were TENS of submarines without crews. Plus three hundred anti-aircraft and anti-aircraft gunners, plus about 600 other combatants. That's okay. By the way, quite recently it turned out that Gustloff did manage to get artillery weapons.

Steuben is worse - there were practically only wounded. But here the fools themselves were walking at night on a hospital ship REGISTERED in the Red Cross without lights. Marinesko himself considered by the way that the cruiser Emden was attacking, which the liner really looked like (two pipes, a long and low superstructure, "butt" masts and, most importantly, posts for anti-aircraft guns in the dark, similar in silhouette to gun mounts. Here is "Steuben" yes - he died by mistake of identification. Gustloff was legally drowned, as well as "Goya" (5000 wounded and evacuated on a steamer with a load of explosives, from the L-3 torpedo "fuknulo" terribly).

> Which does not detract from the achievements of Marinesco. Although it was much more difficult for him to torpedo Steuben, and there was more exhaust from him.

You probably wanted to say from the Hipper - after a few hours he passed through the C-13 position (simultaneously sinking part of those fleeing from the Gustloff at full speed) - but Marinesco did not have a German schedule, how does he know that such a beast will go after? He did not have modern books. He just left and went after the attack on instructions to lie down in a reserve position, and then sink the "Steuben" which he sank with the stern, and the "Hipper" was missed (although it was an ideal target - the cruiser was damaged and could not give full speed, one destroyer in escort). We know this now, but Marinesco did not know that.

> I imagined how a "heel" drove up to the boat pier DHL and Marinesco were handed a ba-alshaya (A3) certificate with baroque curls, Gothic letters and Hitler's personal signature, where it was reported that he (bingo!) Had become a personal enemy of the Reich I class

This is roughly how it was. In the Finnish port, a group of SWEDISH war correspondents and our political father drive up to Marinesko and present them with a Swedish newspaper - which describes in detail his feat and a statement that he is Hitler's personal enemy and sank 3,600 submariners - "according to a report from reliable sources." The story with "Gustloff" was promoted by the SWEDISH press. Our first publications about this are translations from there.

> And the Finnish ones? It seems that under the contract we owed it. What happened then with the port facilities in Riga, to my shame I don’t know, although I live here.

It's not about the bases - it's about the mines. The evacuation of the Germans in the Baltic was provided by about 100 base and "naval" minesweepers and almost 400 !!! auxiliary and boat. This is for December 1944. We could oppose this at the Finnish bases with our 2 large trawls (just Riga), 3-5 Finnish and about 30-40 boats. ALL. It is banal - even for a submarine brigade to leave at the same time, there were no minesweepers ... By that time, the Baltic was already so dirty that it was impossible to fight in it without trawling. The worst of all were the British - British planes placed mines from the air "wherever God sends" - at night, according to radar data - with a discrepancy of KILOMETERS ... Therefore, our fleet did not oppose the Germans with large ships - only with a PART of the submarine and a couple of detachments of boats. And the naval aviation was periodically pulled to the land front and the maximum that ONE time in 1944 was 120 aircraft (2/3 - fighters). But our specialists also found benefit in the German evacuation - these troops actually did not have time to actively fight after the evacuation, plus the Germans burned down the remnants of fuel in Pomerania (the evacuation cost the Germans about 500,000 tons of oil, from the last supply of 1,500,000 for the entire Reich) ... Coal was burned even more - about 700,000 - leaving the railroad transport bled. This is a significant plus.

> If it were not for the problems with fuel for the ships, the Kurlandia GA could have been completely exported to Germany.

If my grandmother had a buoy, she would work as a boatswain. The whole plot of the "evacuation comedy" is in the fuel

> As I understand it, fvl meant that the evacuated troops were of little combat capability, since all the fuel was consumed by the fleet. Arnswaalde managed to unblock

No, it's not about the troops - it's about the supply and maintenance of the troops - the fleet worked because the transport stopped - therefore, even strong blows - there was no one and had nothing to properly supply - and they could not have operational depth. The navy did not bleed the army, but the REARS - and without the rear, the army is ineffective. The success of the German army in 1939-1942 was based on operational mobility and abundant supplies (German tank division under normal conditions, it "ate" 700 tons of cargo per day - this standard is even higher than that of the "rich Americans" (520-540 tons). When all this at the end of 1944 and beginning of 1945 was covered with a basin (operations in Courland are only a small part of the general crisis of the German transport system carried out by the allies (both ours and the Anglo-Americans - strikes on the near and far "rear", along the supply lines were in 1943 at the head Our people even criticized (during the war) for strikes on large industrial facilities of the Allies - such as "chop off transport" - not strategic bombing, but raids on communications) - everything was covered with "wet." And the same solstice - became a simple tactical operation, without any depth and duration (as well as, say, Balaton, which got stuck in a "sack" just by the "separation from the rear" by only 18 kilometers - which made it possible to fend off the blow. because even if the "near rear" is working, then in the "deep rear" everything is in the ass). railroad... A win in one - a loss in another - we won in direct military matters (only a PART of them were evacuated) - we lost the ability to supply these troops in battle and keep them combat-ready. Dialectics.

> I suspect he (Stalin) greatly underestimated the role of the fleet, like our entire leadership.

The role of which fleet? Ours who showed himself to the Finnish (how many times did our battleships out of 1000 with a lot of shells hit the Finnish batteries?) Or the German - who carried out a Norwegian landing operation beyond the brink of a foul, but defeated the four times strongest fleet of the Metropolis?

> For this, a large land army is not needed-we need aviation and a navy.

ALREADY needed. As early as 1940 in England 30 divisions are indispensable. Over the winter, Britain has grown fat and already has about 60 divisional equivalents in the metropolis and close to it reach (Canada). By the way, with all this, "Sea Lion" 1941 is a much more realistic operation than "Sea Lion" 1940 ... At least Hitler already has WHAT to land and WHAT to at least suppress the British coastal defenses and to whom to distract the British fleet.

> Anyone. On the issue of the German landing in England - English, on the issue of supplying Sevastopol - our.

The funny thing is that in 1941 the British fleet is ALREADY weaker than in 1940. Part of the forces are firmly diverted to the Mediterranean, the H compound from Gibraltar can no longer be overtaken FAST (the Hunt for Bismarck showed that it takes about 2 days), the Eastern Fleet is being formed. In general, the version about 1941 Sea Lion had its own reasons, and it's lousy. But the combat capability of the German is HIGHER than in 1940 - the damaged steamers in Norway were corrected, the BDB with Siebel went in series, new battleships, the aviation still received the first torpedo bombers ... In general, the balance of forces in 1941 is better for the Germans than in 1940.

> What's incomprehensible? Just as they did not understand that the English fleet would easily disrupt the landing of the Germans, they also did not understand that our fleet was capable of supplying Sevastopol, despite enemy aircraft..

This is all clear to you, you are kind of smart. And then, in 1940, the British fleet disrupted the landing of the Germans in Norway - here's a snooze for you. Whether the ships of the Black Sea Fleet were able to supply Sevastopol in 1942 - they COULD NOT return. Convoy gathering all in a heap ala "Pedestal" and lose 3 out of 5 could. But even then with the PROBABILITY of success. We didn’t risk it, but we could. Yes, you could have won, but you can not. They were afraid (and justifiably) that it would turn out like with the "Krymchaks" - they were escorted to Sevastopol but did not have time to unload them - they were lost at the berths. "Georgia" is the same.

> Oh yes. Our fleet showed itself in the 41st. What's in Tallinn what's in Sevastopol.

Well, in fairness, there are examples in 1941 and a plus for our fleet - Odessa, Theodosia landing, Western faces, finally. Our fleet is in something like Italian in the same war - the smaller the ship, the better and more efficiently we fight. Such is the paradox.

> What data is there on the losses of our ships in the roadstead of Sevastopol on June 22, 1941 as a result of a raid by German aircraft. And is it true that it was an unexpected raid? (there was a dispute with one person, I would like to hear an authoritative opinion)

The German so-called raid on Sevastopol was the laying of minefields from the air. The losses are gigantic, given that only 9 German aircraft participated in the raid - a tugboat, a floating crane (25 people died) and the Bystry destroyer (blown up on July 1 - 24 people died, 80 were injured with something), the destroyer was never able to restore and during the repairs it was finished off by German aviation.

> But specifically on June 22, it turns out that only 2 ships were sunk - a tug and a floating crane. It is unlikely that this accounted for half of the ships that were at that moment in the port of Sevastopol. Thank you for the clarification.

Specifically, at 22-23 - yes. Plus, there were still casualties on the shore - out of the mines dropped, 3 fell on the city (3 people died), the German mines had a design unique for the Second World War - when they fell on land, they worked like 1-ton bombs - and when they fell into the water, they were placed as bottom mines ...

The performance for 9 cars (of which it was like 7 with mines) is simply amazing. We were really not ready to fight bottom mines, despite the fact that in Grazhdanskaya in 1919 on the northern Dvina we already had experience in using them and fighting them. All Ostekhbyuro mlyn are innocently repressed.

> How true is the opinion that the Americans won Midway largely by luck - the last forces stumbled upon aircraft carriers before the launch of Japanese strike groups?

This is practically the official point of view.

A randomly coordinated attack by independent groups of dive bombers is proof of this.

But on the other hand, the Americans just put the squeeze on the Japanese ... Making fewer mistakes than they did.

> The Japanese lost the battle themselves without drawing the right conclusions from the coral sea. The Japanese kept the aircraft carriers together, and therefore the accidental breakthrough of the dive bombers decided the matter. And the fighters were below, because they were exterminating the American dive bombers

Midway would have looked even more interesting had the Americans not made mistakes.

A joint attack by the base and carrier aircraft of all three groups would push the Japanese defenses much more interestingly. four nines Zero air patrol all one would not hold back SUCH armada. Even the torpedo bombers would be more than just victims, and the dive bombers of the coastal base would have achieved success.

> And I would be curious what would happen if the Americans used the B-17 purely as a scout. Zero is not very good against him, the Japanese anti-aircraft guns are also not so hot

Coordination of all attacks would be possible. But they didn’t guess yet - or rather, on the contrary, on the experience of Midway — they just guessed - after him, several B-17s with Espiritu Santo successfully flew for long-range detection during the Guadalcanal campaign.

But instead of this, they used the regular Catalins as a scout - which did not allow them to "hang" over the Japanese formation. Yes, and the torpedo capabilities of the catalin were prolonged (one night attack on the night before the battle, with one torpedo that got into the transport)

> 1. What do you think - thereDid the element of chance and luck work more, or the side that “made fewer mistakes” naturally won?

I used to think about luck - now I am more and more convinced about "fewer mistakes". The Americans EVERYTHING did what was in their power strategically - they learned the enemy's plans, concentrated their forces, strengthened the air group on the atoll as best they could and what they could, very competently took up a position for the aircraft carrier groups - from the least threatened direction in Japanese opinion, prepared the forces in advance (Pai's detachment with an escort "Long Island" for reconnaissance) in case something goes wrong at all and the Japanese, instead of or after the success with Midway, rush further, etc.

In general, having done everything they could in advance, they could afford to make mistakes already during the operation.

> If the amers lost to Midway (with the loss of 3 Yorktowns), how much would this affect the scale of their actions in the European theater of operations? I mean, it would have thwarted Operation Torch and everything that followed - Sicily, Italy, etc..?

Figs knows him - most likely nothing would have affected Torch - because they have already "invested" too much in him. But everything else would be interesting. A pair of combat-ready light aircraft carriers in the Atlantic (Ranger and Wasp) would most likely THEN have been deployed in a pandanus to the refurbished Saratoga on Tikhiy. Replacing the loss. But for the success of the landing in Sicily, the British and escorts would have been enough. But there would be no active actions on the Guadalcanal - they would wait for the Indy and Essexes to enter service. That is, in the Pacific Ocean, they would have lost several months of time in inactivity.

> Battleship booking is not combined (although I don’t know what you are investing in this) and not always spaced.

The belt after the First World War is almost always (the exceptions are the Germans), but those also have developed bevels and 80 mm glacis on the Scharnhorst (the reduced armor for 700 mm flies out along the waterline, and the Scharnhorst is protected better than Bismarck, the Americans (except for the South Dakota series - the best American battleship on protection) and the Japanese, well, these poor as church mice are simple) - and the same Italians on "Littorio" have THREE armor contours (4 consecutive layers of armor - 70mm + 270 + 40 + 30 ... distance from 0.7 to 2 meters of the belt.

> that minefields are such a powerful defense against the Japanese fleet.

Quite effective. Fortunately, the sea allowed. Although, by and large, ours even went too far - all 1941-45 our and Japanese ships were blown up on our mines.

In certain areas of the war in the Pacific, minefields have played their part. Where the depths allowed. And the failure to send the high-speed mine-loader "Terror" to Wake in 1941 is still considered one of the brilliant but unrealized capabilities of the American fleet.

> But this is not a magic wand, they could not have saved soviet fleet in the face of the total superiority of the Japanese.

And they were not going to save him - the task of the Pacific Fleet is to lay mines and die - or rather, retreat to the fortress area of ​​Vladivostok under minefields and extensive artillery batteries and sit there under siege.

Aviation in our area is stronger than the Japanese (Lagg-3 is steeper than Hayabusa, the Japanese tested it in 1942, the Ishaks of the border troops and then in 1945 they drowned the largest vessel (it burned for three days).

The fleet will gnaw through these islands with 305-203mm batteries as it was believed for a long time, the Japanese army is weaker than ours. Strategic impasse. The Japanese understood this. It's one thing just mines - and another is a mine-artillery position and over 70 submarines.

> and what's so terrible for the Japanese empire? lock up, besiege and destroy. Well, tell me, why is that bad?

How much fuel will go away. At the same time, it is impossible to besiege from land without completely breaking OKDVA near Khabarovsk. This is not for you isolated Port Arur (held out for 11 months, of which 8 were heavily encumbered) and Qingdao (3-4 months of blockade and taxation). And most importantly, even having won at a high price - what does Japan get - a poor seaside?

And what does the USSR lose - we retreat to Chita and wait for the Japanese logistics to ruin?

> taking into account the star of the western front The USSR would have gone to the world like the Republic of Ingushetia before it.

And if you hadn't gone? The "plutocratic" USA here seemed to be much softer opponents.

> from the same fig as to fit in for the USSR.

states have been playing this game for 5,000 years. As soon as someone begins to seize new and new territories, everyone rushes to interfere with him in order to prevent his unlimited gain. The Japanese were simply wrong. Overestimating their strength (to create an impenetrable perimeter for the United States) and underestimating the strength of the United States (the Japanese believed that the United States, after the second wave of the depression in 1937, was on the verge of collapse (it was not for nothing that they began the second wave of operations in China in 1937, when the United States wiped out even when Japanese dive bombers sank American gunboat).

Nikolai Pavlovich made the same mistake before Krymskaya. Cardinally. It happens.

Sometimes they just make mistakes. The whole Hisagi no kaze plan (just kidding) is this mistake.

> Russia has won many, the United States has a more alarming history.

The United States is just out of the way. Conquest in the 19th century would have cost more than all the bonuses from it. Actually, therefore, Britain in the 1780s did not press down the colonists, and in 1815 they did not (fortunately for England, the situevina began to be recruited there abruptly - South America "freed" with British help and it was possible to GET INTO it, which they began to do.

If the United States had a land border with Europe, everything would be different. The only thing that is achieved with the help of a mine defensive position is to gain time. The bigger and better the position, the better the time.

The Germans, for example, in 1944-45, in fact, only paralyzed ANY actions of the Baltic Fleet with mines with ships larger than the gunboat west of Narva Bay.

Here's an example of buying time. Minami.

Russia in 1915 won the first Moonsund - three days - enough to disrupt the German operation - the Germans no longer had the fuel to develop the success.

From the book of Stratagems. About the Chinese art of living and surviving. TT. 12 the author von Senger Harro

14.9. Nostradamus in World War II Ellik Howe in the book "The Black Game - British Subversive Operations against the Germans during the Second World War" in the second

From the book Beware, History! Myths and legends of our country the author Dymarsky Vitaly Naumovich

The Role of the Allies in World War II On May 9, Russia celebrates Victory Day - perhaps the only truly national public holiday - celebrated by our former allies in the anti-Hitler coalition a day earlier, on May 8. And, unfortunately, this

From the book History of the East. Volume 2 the author Vasiliev Leonid Sergeevich

Japan in World War II In the fall of 1939, when the war broke out and the West European countries began to suffer defeats one after another and became the object of occupation by Nazi Germany, Japan decided that its time had come. Tightening all the nuts inside the country

the author

Japan and the USSR in World War II The defeat of the Japanese troops in the area of ​​Lake Hasan in 1938 and in Mongolia in 1939 dealt a serious blow to the propaganda myth about the "invincibility of the imperial army", about the "exclusiveness of the Japanese army." American historian

From the book The Psychology of War in the Twentieth Century. Historical experience of Russia [ Full version with attachments and illustrations] the author Senyavskaya Elena Spartakovna

Finns in World War II The Soviet-Finnish military confrontation is a very fertile material for studying the formation of the enemy image. There are several reasons for this. First of all, any phenomena are best understood by comparison. Opportunities for comparison in

From the book Questions and Answers. Part I: World War II. Member countries. Army, weapons. the author Lisitsyn Fedor Viktorovich

Aviation in World War II ***> I have heard the opinion that it was the French aviation that proved to be very good ... Uh-huh, approximately at the level of Soviet aviation, which "showed" itself in the summer of 1941 as it is ACCEPTED to be considered "bad". The loss of the Germans in 1000 cars downed and

From the book 10th SS Panzer Division "Frundsberg" the author Ponomarenko Roman Olegovich

Germany in World War II Baryatinsky M. Medium tank Panzer IV // Bronekollektsiya, No. 6, 1999. - 32 p. Bernage J. German tank forces... Battle of Normandy June 5 - July 20, 1944. - M .: ACT, 2006 .-- 136 p. Bolyanovskiy A.

From the book World War II. 1939-1945. History of the great war the author Shefov Nikolay Alexandrovich

The Turning Point in World War II By the end of the fall of 1942, the German onslaught had fizzled out. At the same time, due to the pulling up of Soviet reserves and the rapid growth of military production in the east of the USSR, the number of troops and equipment at the front is leveling off. On the main

From the book Ukraine: History the author Subtelny Orest

23. UKRAINE IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR Europe was heading towards World War II, and it seemed that Ukrainians as a whole had nothing to lose in the course of the radical shifts that it brought with them. A constant target of the excesses of Stalinism and the steadily increasing repression of the Poles,

From the book Battles won and lost. A new look at the major military campaigns of World War II by Baldwin Hanson

From the book of 100 predictions of Nostradamus the author Agekyan Irina Nikolaevna

ON THE SECOND WORLD WAR Deep in Western Europe A small will be born to poor people, He will seduce a great multitude with His speeches. Influence is growing in the Kingdom of the East (c. 3, c.

From the book Why Jews Don't Like Stalin the author Rabinovich Yakov Iosifovich

The participation of Jews in World War II A brief outline World War II (1939-1945) swept across Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania - a gigantic area of ​​22 million square kilometers, with 1 billion 700 million people, or more than three quarters of the population, sucked into its orbit

From the book of the USA the author Burova Irina Igorevna

USA in World War II Observing the events in Europe, the USA did not flatter itself about the possibility of maintaining a long-term peace in it, but at the same time America, having returned to the old policy of isolationism, did not want to interfere in the development of European affairs. Back in August 1935

From the book Russia and South Africa: three centuries of ties the author Filatova Irina Ivanovna

In the second world war

From the book The Battle of Syria. From Babylon to ISIS the author Shirokorad Alexander Borisovich

From the book The Defeat of Fascism. USSR and Anglo-American allies in World War II the author Olshtynsky Lennor Ivanovich

2.3. 1943 The promised second front was again postponed The Battle of Kursk - a radical turning point in World War II Allied landing in Sicily, anti-fascist struggle in Italy Offensive operations of Soviet troops and allies in winter - spring 1943

This section provides information on the qualitative and numerical composition of the navies of the states that participated in the hostilities of the Second World War. In addition, data are provided on the fleets of some countries that officially took a neutral position, but actually provided assistance to one or another of the participants in the war. Unfinished or commissioned ships after the end of the war were not counted. The ships that were used for military purposes, but were flying the civilian flag, were also not taken into account. Ships transferred or received from one country to another (including under lend-lease agreements) were not taken into account, just as captured or restored ships were not taken into account. For a number of reasons, the data on the dead amphibious and small ships, as well as boats are given at the minimum values ​​and in fact can be much higher. The same goes for midget submarines. When describing tactical and technical characteristics cited data on the time of the last modernization or rearmament.

Characterizing warships as a weapon of war at sea, it should be noted that the purpose of such a war was to fight for sea communications, as a means for the largest, massive shipments. Depriving the enemy of the opportunity to use the sea for transport, at the same time using it extensively for the same purposes, is the path to victory in the war. For the conquest and use of supremacy at sea, just one strong navy is not enough; this also requires a large merchant and transport fleets, conveniently located bases and a state leadership with a naval mindset. Only the combination of all this provides sea power.

To fight the navy, you have to concentrate all your forces, and to protect merchant shipping, you have to separate them. The nature of military operations at sea always fluctuates between these two poles. It is the nature of military operations that determines the need for certain warships, the specifics of their weapons and tactics of use.

In preparing for war, the leading maritime states used various military naval doctrines, but none of them proved to be effective or correct. And already in the course of the war, with the exertion of all forces, it was necessary not only to correct them, but to radically change them for the planned military actions.

So, the British Navy, based on the outdated ships of the interwar period, put its main emphasis on large artillery ships. The German navy formed a massive submarine fleet. The Royal Italian Navy built high-speed light cruisers and destroyers, as well as small submarines with low technical characteristics... Trying to replace the tsarist fleet, the USSR accelerated the construction of ships of all classes of obsolete models, relying on the doctrine of coastal defense. The backbone of the US fleet was made up of heavy artillery ships and obsolete destroyers. France strengthened its fleet with light artillery ships with a limited cruising range. Battleships and aircraft carriers were built in Japan.

Fundamental changes in the structure of fleets have occurred with the massive introduction of radars and sonars, as well as the development of communications. The use of aircraft identification systems, artillery and anti-aircraft fire control, detection of underwater, surface and air targets, radio reconnaissance also changed the tactics of the fleets. Gone are major naval battles, and the war with the transport fleet has become a priority.

The development of weapons (the emergence of new types of carrier-based aircraft, unguided missiles, new types of torpedoes, mines, bombs, etc.) allowed the fleets to conduct independent operational and tactical military operations. Fleet from auxiliary forces ground forces became the main impact force... Aviation became an effective means of fighting the enemy's fleet as well as defending its own.

Considering the course of the war in conjunction with technical progress, the development of the fleets can be characterized as follows. At the initial stage of the war, the ever-growing German submarine fleet actually blocked the sea communications of Great Britain and its allies. To protect them, a significant number of anti-submarine ships were required, and their equipment with sonars turned submarines from hunters into targets. The need to protect large surface ships, convoys and ensure the conduct of future offensive operations demanded the massive construction of aircraft carriers. This characterizes the middle stage of the war. At the final stage, for carrying out massive amphibious operations both in Europe and in the Pacific Ocean, there was an urgent need for landing craft and support vessels.

All these tasks could be solved only by the United States, whose powerful economy during the war years turned the allies into debtors for many years, and the country into a superstate. It should be noted that the supply of ships under the Lend-Lease agreements took place within the framework of the rearmament of the United States, i.e. the allies were given outdated ships, with low performance characteristics or without proper equipment. This applied equally to all beneficiaries, incl. both the USSR and Great Britain.

It should also be mentioned that both the large US ships and the small ones differed from the ships of all other countries in the presence of comfortable living conditions for the crews. If in other countries, when building ships, priority was given to the number of weapons, ammunition, fuel reserves, then the American naval commanders put the comfort of the crew on a par with the requirements for the combat qualities of the ship.


(no transmitted / received)

Table continuation

The total number of navies of 42 countries (possessing navies or at least one ship) that took part in World War II was 16.3 thousand ships, of which, according to incomplete data, at least 2.6 thousand were killed. fleets included 55.3 thousand small ships, boats and landing craft, as well as 2.5 thousand submarines, excluding ultra-small submarines.

The five countries with the largest fleets were: USA, UK, USSR, Germany and Japan, which had 90% of warships from the total, 85% of submarines and 99% of small and landing craft.

Italy and France, possessing large fleets, as well as smaller Norway and the Netherlands, could not effectively dispose of their ships, flooding part of them and becoming the main suppliers of trophies to the enemy.

It is possible to determine the significance of the types of ships in military operations only taking into account the stages of the war. So at the initial stage of the war, the dominant role was played by submarines, blocking enemy communications. In the middle stage of the war, the main role was played by destroyers and anti-submarine ships, which suppressed the enemy's submarine fleets. In the final stage of the war, aircraft carriers with support ships and landing ships came out on top.

During the war, the merchant fleet with a tonnage of 34.4 million tons was sunk. At the same time, submarines accounted for 64%, aviation - 11%, surface ships - 6%, mines - 5%.

Of the total number of sunken warships of the fleets, approximately 45% of the merit of aviation, 30% of submarines, 19% of the share of surface ships.

Greek merchant fleet(Greek. Ελληνικός Εμπορικός Στόλος ) was a participant in World War II, along with the Greek Navy. The merchant fleet became a participant in the war about a year before Greece entered the war and continued its participation in the war after the liberation of Greece (October 1944), for another 11 months.

History professor Ilias Iliopoulos notes that the participation of the Greek merchant fleet in the war is in line with the thesis of the American naval theorist, Rear Admiral Alfred Mahan, that the naval power of a nation is the sum of the navy and merchant fleets. Iliopoulos notes that in ancient times the "great sea state" of Athens (Thucydides) was the sum of the potentials of the Athenian military and merchant fleet, and that Athens then had about 600 merchant ships.

Background

By the most conservative estimate, on the eve of the Second World War, the Greek merchant fleet was the ninth in the world in terms of tonnage and consisted of 577 steamers. Considering the fact that the top ten included the Axis countries - Germany, Italy and Japan - as well as the fleet of occupied France (see Vichy Regime), the importance of the Greek merchant fleet for the anti-fascist coalition was more than significant. Professor I. Iliopoulos writes that the Greek merchant fleet had 541 ships under the Greek flag with a total capacity of 1,666,859 GRTs and 124 steamers under foreign flags with a capacity of 454,318 GRTs. According to Iliopoulos, the Greek merchant fleet was in fourth place in the world, and the Greek dry cargo fleet in second.

Researcher Dimitris Halon, based on German sources, writes that in 1938, a year before the start of World War II, the Greek merchant fleet was in third place in the world, after England and Norway, with 638 ships, with a total capacity of 1.9 million GRT. 96% of all ships in the Greek merchant fleet were dry cargo ships.

According to Rear Admiral Sotirios Grigoriadis, the Greek merchant fleet had 600 ocean steamers and 700 Mediterranean motor ships before the war. 90% of the ocean steamers were dry cargo ships. Grigoriadis confirms that the Greek pre-war fleet was ahead of the fleets of Sweden, the Soviet Union, Canada, Denmark and Spain, but notes that the Greek fleet did not exceed 3% of the world's fleet, while the first fleet in the world, the British, in 1939 had 26 , 11% of the world's fleet tonnage. However, over the course of several months of the war, the situation at sea for Britain deteriorated sharply. By mid-1940, the British Navy only had fuel for 2 months. By September 1941, the British merchant fleet had lost 25% of its ships. In this regard, the Greek merchant fleet acquired great importance for the Allies, and especially for Britain.

The War Trade Agreement, signed in January 1940 with the government of then neutral Greece, with the support of Greek shipowners and the Greek sailors' union, essentially placed one of the largest fleets in the world at the disposal of the British government and excluded the transportation of Axis cargo by Greek ships.

Related Videos

Prelude to World War

As a consequence, the Greek volunteers in Spain belonged mainly to 3 groups: the sailors of the Greek merchant fleet - the Greeks living in exile - the Greeks of the island of Cyprus, which was under British control. Greek merchant sailors made up a significant part of the Greek company of the Rigas Fereos International Brigades.

In addition to sending volunteers, the main task of the Greek Seafarers' Union, headquartered in Marseille, led by Kamburoglu, who was later shot by the Germans in France, was the uninterrupted supply of the Republicans. Due to the threat of submarines, cargo was more often delivered to the ports of Algeria, from where it was delivered by caiks to Spain. On the last shoulder, most of the Greek sailors were armed: 191. Many sailors volunteered for the Republican Army as soon as they arrived in Spain. Others, such as officers Papazoglu and Homer Serafimidis, joined the Republican Navy: 210.

A significant contribution of Greek sailors was the refusal to work on ships carrying cargo for Franco, in contrast to ships carrying cargo from the USSR, despite the fact that the latter were constantly under threat from Italian submarines and German and Italian aviation: 219.

The outbreak of World War II and the seafarers' union

With the outbreak of World War, the pro-communist Union of Greek Seafarers located in Marseille (ΝΕΕ, in 1943 was reorganized into the Federation of Greek Seafarers' Organizations, ΟΕΝΟ), not forgetting about “ class struggle", Gave the instruction" Keep ships on the move. "

After the surrender of France, the leadership of the Greek sailors' union moved to New York.

The period from the outbreak of World War II (September 1, 1939) to the outbreak of the Greco-Italian War (October 28, 1940)

During this period, many Greek merchant ships chartered by the Allies were sunk in the Atlantic, mostly by German submarines. Some Greek ships were confiscated in ports controlled by the Axis forces and their allies. The total losses of the Greek merchant fleet in this first period of the war reached 368,621 BRTs.

Already in the first month of the war, the commanders of German submarines received the following instruction on September 30, 1939: “... since the Greeks sold or chartered a large number of (merchant) ships to the British, the Greek ships should be considered enemy .... When attacking, the submarines must remain invisible .... " ... However, at that time, some commanders of German submarines still observed naval ethics.

Memorial to the German submarine U-35 in Ventry, Ireland

The Greek steamship Ioanna (950 BRT) was stopped on June 1, 1940 by the German submarine U-37, 180 miles from the Spanish port of Vigo. The crew was ordered to leave the steamer, which was then sunk. Captain Vasilios Laskos, himself a former submariner and who died in 1942 while commanding the Greek submarine "Katzonis (Υ-1)", together with his crew, sailed on boats in a stormy sea for 3 days until he was picked up by fishermen. Laskos and his crew headed to Lisbon, where a colony of 500 Greek merchant sailors had already formed, whose ships were sunk by German submarines. All of them were embarked on the Greek merchant ship Attica and taken to Greece.

A similar case is described in his book by the senior mechanic of the Greek steamer "Adamastos", Constantine Domvros. The steamer was stopped on July 1, 1940 in the North Atlantic by the German submarine U-14. The steamer was sunk. The crew was left in boats 500 miles from land, but were not shot.

Over time, such cases became less and less and the sinking of Greek merchant ships was accompanied by the death of their crews.

This period was also marked by the participation of Greek merchant ships in the Dunkirk evacuation. One of the Greek losses during the evacuation was the steamer Galaxias (4393 BRT), sunk by German aircraft in the French port of Dieppe at the beginning of the operation. The participation of Greek merchant ships in the Dunkiri evacuation found its way into Churchill's memoirs.

The period from the start of the Greco-Italian War (October 28, 1940) to the start of the German invasion of Greece (April 6, 1941)

Of the 47 mobilized passenger ships, 3 were converted into floating hospitals (Attika, Ellinis and Sokratis). Also used as hospitals were the cargo-and-passenger "Polikos", "Andros", "Ionia" and "Moskhanti" (the last two without the identification marks of the Red Cross.

During this period, the losses of the Greek merchant fleet were mainly the result of the activities of the Italian Navy (Regia Marina Italiana). These were cargo steamers and motor ships mobilized by the Greek government and used as transports. The losses also included Greek ships confiscated in Italian ports, immediately after the rejection of the Italian ultimatum by the Greek government and the outbreak of war. The total losses of this period, including the continuing losses of the Greek merchant fleet in the Atlantic, reached 135,162 BRTs.

The period from the beginning of the German invasion (April 6, 1941) to the complete occupation of Greece (May 31, 1941)

Greek cargo-passenger steamer Andros. Used as a floating hospital. Sunk by German aircraft on 04/25/1941.

In October 1940, the Greek army repelled the Italian attack and transferred the hostilities to the territory of Albania. This was the first victory of the anti-fascist coalition countries against the Axis forces. The Italian spring offensive on March 9-15, 1941 in Albania showed that the Italian army could not change the course of events, which made German intervention in order to save its ally inevitable.

At the request of the Greek government, by the end of March 1941, Great Britain sent 40 thousand of its soldiers to Greece. At the same time, the British occupied a second line of defense along the Aliakmon River, away from the front line in Albania and the potential theater of military operations on the Greek-Bulgarian border.

The German invasion, from Bulgaria allied to the Germans, began on April 6, 1941. The Germans could not immediately break through the line of the Greek defense on the Greek-Bulgarian border, but went to the Macedonian capital, the city of Thessaloniki, through the territory of Yugoslavia. A group of divisions in Eastern Macedonia was cut off from the main forces of the Greek army fighting against the Italians in Albania. German troops went into the rear of the Greek army in Albania. The road to Athens was open to German divisions.

Along with the losses of the Greek Navy, which lost 25 ships during this period, the losses of the Greek merchant fleet, within a month, reached 220,581 BRT, which was 18% of its potential. All losses, both to the Greek Navy and the Greek merchant fleet, were the result of the activities of the Luftwaffe.

Among other ships, Luftwaffe aircraft sank floating hospitals despite the Red Cross signs and their full illumination at night (Attica April 11, 1941, Esperos April 21, Ellinis April 21, Sokratis April 21, Polikos April 25th and Andros April 25th.

The main target of German aircraft was Piraeus (9 sunk ships), other Greek ports, but the entire water area of ​​the Aegean Sea (88 sunk ships) was a zone of incessant attacks by German aircraft on warships and merchant ships.

The losses of the Greek merchant fleet associated with the battle for Crete (17 sunk ships) reached 39,700 BRT.

A large number of Greek merchant ships, with Greek military units and refugees, as well as British, Australian and New Zealand units, followed the ships of the Greek Navy to Egypt and Palestine.

The period from the beginning of the occupation (31.5.1941) to the end of the Second World War (15.8.1945)

Greek steamer Calypso Vergoti Sunk by a German submarine on June 29, 1941 in the Atlantic.

During this period, the Greek merchant fleet lost most of its potential. Greek merchant ships were sunk by Axis forces in all latitudes and longitudes of the globe. A large number of Greek ships confiscated by the Germans and Italians were sunk by the Allies. The losses of this period also include Greek ships confiscated by the Japanese in the ports of Japan and China. The total losses of the Greek merchant fleet during this period amounted to 535,280 BRT.

Among the many heroic acts of Greek merchant sailors of this period, two were noted in the course of supporting British forces in North Africa.

On February 2, 1943, the Greek merchant ship "Nikolaos G Kulukundis" (Captain G. Panorgios), despite the shelling of Italian and German aircraft and ships, managed to deliver a cargo of gasoline to Libya for the 8th british army... British Prime Minister Churchill visited the ship on 4 February to personally express his gratitude to the crew.

A similar act of the Greek ship "Elpis" (Captain N. Kuvalias) received official gratitude from the King of England.

During this period, Greek merchant ships took part in convoys to England and Murmansk, as reflected in Churchill's memoirs.

Along with the Greek corvettes "Tombasis" and "Kriezis", the ships of the Greek merchant fleet also accepted the allied landing in Normandy. The steamers Agios Spiridon (Captain G. Samothrakis) and Georgios P. (Captain D. Parisis) were flooded by crews in shallow water to create a breakwater. The steamers America (Captain S. Theophilatos) and Ellas (Captain G. Trilivas) continued to deliver troops and cargo to the Normandy coast.

It should be noted that the crews for the ships to be sunk were recruited from volunteers, after an appeal to two secretaries of the Greek sailors' union, one of whom was the communist Antonis Abatelos.

One of the losses recent years During the war there was the steamer "Pileus" (4965 BRT), torpedoed by the German submarine U-852 on March 13, 1944 off the coast of West Africa. For murder after torpedoing Greek sailors, the crew of U-852, after the war, was brought to trial.

By the end of the war, the number of Greek merchant ships sunk by German submarines had reached 124.

Losses

In total, during the war, the Greek merchant fleet lost 486 ships, with a total capacity of 1,400,000 GRT, which was 72% of its potential. About half of these losses occurred in the first 2 years of the war. By comparison, the British navy lost 63% of its potential. Against the background of total allied losses of 4,834 ships and a total of 19,700,000 BRTs, the Greek losses look particularly high. Of the 19,000 Greek merchant sailors who served on merchant ships during the war, 4,000 were killed, mostly by torpedoing their ships. 2,500 sailors were left disabled. 200 sailors who survived the sinking of their ships or captivity suffered serious or irreparable damage to their mental health.

Greek merchant fleet after the war

Museum ship Hellas Liberty in June 2010

Even during the war (1944) and at the request of the Greek government in exile, the US government provided 15 Liberty-class ships to the Greek shipowners M. Kulukundis K. Lemos and N. Rethymnis.

In recognition of the enormous contribution of the Greek merchant fleet to the victory of the Allies and the losses suffered by them, at the end of the war, the US government provided the Greek shipowners who lost their ships in the Atlantic, 100 Liberty on favorable terms. Each of the 100 ships was offered for $ 650,000, with a 25% prepayment and a 17-year loan with interest, guaranteed by the Greek government. In subsequent years, but already on current commercial terms, another 700 Liberty was acquired by Greek shipowners.

If, according to the original idea, Liberty was built as “ships for five years” and their massive demolition occurred in the 1960s, then the Greek shipowners operated these ships for another two decades. The last Liberty of Greek shipowners was decommissioned in 1985. To a certain extent, Liberty served as the starting point for the post-war take-off of the Greek merchant fleet (under the Greek and other flags), which has firmly “retained its leading position in the world merchant fleet” to this day.

In recognition of Liberty's contribution to the take-off of the Greek merchant fleet, in 2009, one of the last Liberty in the world was converted into a museum ship, the Hellas Liberty, and delivered to its permanent anchorage in the Greek port of Piraeus.

Greek sailors' union after the war

With the defeat of the Democratic Army, many merchant sailors found themselves in exile in Eastern Europe and the USSR. Antonis Abatelos, one of the two trade union secretaries noted by historiography at the Normandy landings, was sentenced to death in 1947 for organizing a strike in war time... The execution was overturned, thanks to Abatelos' fame in the world trade union movement and the efforts of his wife, an Englishwoman, Lady Betty Abatielu. Abatelos was released only 16 years later, in 1963.

One of the most famous officers of the merchant navy, Dimitris Tatakis, was tortured to death in January 1949 in a concentration camp on the island of Makronisos.

Veterans of the Greek merchant fleet note that the "first fleet in the world" owes its rise not only and not so much to Greek shipowners as to the labor and sacrifices of Greek sailors, both during the war and in the post-war years.