Torsion fields are a term originally coined by mathematician Eli Cartan in 1922 to refer to a hypothetical physical field generated by the torsion of space.

The name comes from fr. torsion - torsion, from lat. torsio with the same meaning. Just as the general theory of relativity (GR) generalized the Minkowski space by introducing a variable metric field, so the pseudo-Riemannian space-time of general relativity can be generalized by introducing a variable torsion of the connection. The simplest of the theories introducing torsion is the Einstein-Cartan theory of gravity. Experimental attempts to detect torsion fields have yielded no results. Modern physics treats torsion fields as a purely hypothetical object that does not make any contribution to the observed physical effects.

Recently, the term "torsion" (as well as axion (eng. Axion), spin (eng. Spin), spin (eng. Spinor), microlepton (eng. Microlepton)) fields are widely used in various pseudoscientific and esoteric concepts. There are also commercial products that are allegedly based on the use of "torsion fields".

The theoretical possibility of the existence of torsion fields served as the basis for various pseudoscientific speculations using the term "torsion" in a mass of sources.

The so-called "theory of torsion fields" of the members of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Shipov - Akimov, which was not recognized by the scientific community, gained great popularity.

The main provisions of the pseudoscientific theory are set forth in the book by GI Shipov "Theory of Physical Vacuum". According to G.I.Shipov, there are seven levels of reality:

Absolute nothing
Torsion fields are non-material carriers of information that determine the behavior of elementary particles
Vacuum
Elementary particles
Gases
Liquids
Solid bodies
In the interpretation of Shipov and Akimov, "torsion fields", unlike physical fields, do not have energy, for "they have no concept of wave or field propagation", but at the same time they "transfer information", and this information is present "at once in all points of space -time ".

In a number of publications, indications have appeared on the numerous properties of the effect of torsion fields on matter - from a sharp increase in the conductivity of metals to a therapeutic effect in medicine and up to interaction with a certain wave genome, and as measurement techniques in publications devoted to the experimental confirmation of the existence of torsion fields and effects, evoked by them, such esoteric and occult methods and materials as biolocation and "water structured by human thought" were used. On this basis, commercial structures quickly emerged offering various kinds of "torsion" services.

Since the mid-1980s, the USSR has launched a program for the experimental study of "torsion fields" under the leadership of the USSR State Committee for Science and Technology: first in a closed mode (with the active participation of the KGB and the Ministry of Defense), then - from 1989 to 1991 - in the open. The head organization of open research was first the Center for Unconventional Technologies (from 1989 to 1991), then the ISTC "Vent" (the head of these centers is AE Akimov). The concept of torsion fields was used by AE Akimov in the phenomenological concept of "EGS-states", GI Shipov in his "Theory of physical vacuum" and VL Dyatlov in the development of a "polarization model of the physical vacuum". In 1989, under the leadership of A. Ye. Akimov, a group was founded, which began research as the State Center for Non-Traditional Technologies (CNT) under the USSR State Committee for Science and Technology.

Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Evgeny Borisovich Aleksandrov pointed out that for many years Akimov successfully “pushed” a “new physical field” among secret military factories, and even “broke through a government decree, which included dozens of industry institutes and several academic ones. For these programs, he requested 500 million rubles from the state budget! This is almost $ 800 million at the exchange rate of that time ":

TsNT, and then specially created for the torsion research topic ISTC VENT, collaborated with many scientific institutions, including academic ones. In 1991, after a scandal initiated by allegations of falsification of results and embezzlement of public funds, an investigation was carried out by the Committee on Science and Technology, which, by a decree of July 4, 1991, unambiguously characterized the research as pseudoscientific and anti-scientific, the statements of Akimov and his associates - as “contradictory concepts, unambiguously established by modern science, and, despite the used quasi-scientific terminology, unsubstantiated, logically and scientifically unsubstantiated ", noted that millions of rubles were spent to support the research of torsion fields (according to Akimov himself, 500 million), but at the same time" the scientific community has not been acquainted with these discoveries through any channels of open publications, or through closed channels (there is only one private publication, currently refuted) ", and therefore made a recommendation to stop funding research.

According to the assertions of Shipov, Akimov and their supporters, the “acting” so-called. torsion or vortex generators, which supposedly gave a real increase in energy "out of nowhere" (for example, when burning coal, with turbulent mixing of water, etc.).

According to RAS Academician E.P. Kruglyakov in a report at the RAS Presidium, the group was disbanded, and Akimov was dismissed, after which Akimov "organized a small enterprise with the sonorous name 'International Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physics' at the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences." According to AE Akimov, however, in connection with this scandal, neither the CNT nor the ISTC "Vent" was disbanded, and the International Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physics, later transformed into a private company "YUVITOR", is a direct continuation of this group. Within the framework of these organizations, AE Akimov and GI Shipov continued independent work on the development of their concepts of torsion fields.

The theory of "torsion fields" by Akimov and Shipov is rejected by the scientific community and is characterized as a pseudoscientific concept based on a free and erroneous interpretation of the Einstein-Cartan theory and some unorthodox solutions of Maxwell's equations.

The concept of "torsion fields" has been repeatedly condemned by the RAS Commission for Combating Pseudoscience. Critics argue that none of the claimed effects of torsion fields on matter have received experimental confirmation, and some of them have been experimentally disproved. According to the statements of the RAS academicians E. B. Aleksandrov and E. P. Kruglyakov, the studies carried out at the General Physics Institute of the RAS and others have shown the absence of any effects of the studied torsion generators on matter and light. According to M.S.Brodin, director of the Institute of Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, during the study of the torsion field generator provided to the institute, the commission investigating it made an unambiguous conclusion that no new fields are required to explain the observed effects. When studying a metal sample with an allegedly increased conductivity under the influence of torsion fields, both a complete absence of the declared effect and gross methodological errors in previous measurements, casting doubt on the scientific and engineering qualifications of the representatives of the ISTC VENT, were found.

Akimov A.E.,

Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences,
Director of the International Institute
theoretical and applied
physicists of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences,
CEO of Interdisciplinary
scientific and technical center of venture
unconventional technologies

WHAT IS WAITING FOR US
IN THE TORSION FIELD?

(The magazine "Man", No. 5, 1994, pp. 39-46)

Man is a part of Nature, his existence - life - takes place in interaction with other parts of Nature, which contribute to the life of man or hinder it, or even threaten it. For several million years (according to modern estimates of the "age" of mankind), human life depended mainly on terrestrial natural factors, and only rare large meteorites posed a threat from space.

At the end of the 19th and during the 20th centuries, two more coordinates of human life appeared. As a result of the rapid development of the natural sciences, mankind has realized that in addition to the earthly, there are also cosmic natural factors in its life. For example, ultraviolet rays of the Sun and interplanetary magnetic plasma. In the same period, - historically, man-made factors instantly arose. Terrestrial, space and technogenic factors have formed the "three-dimensional" space of human life.

Man found an opportunity to reduce his dependence on natural factors (terrestrial and cosmic), but he paid (and pays) for this with a tragic imbalance in the ecological balance of the Earth. Suffice it to recall herbicides, pesticides, nitrates in agriculture, Chernobyl radionuclides, nuclear waste, marine burials of chemical weapons, ozone holes, etc. according to many scientists, he threatened the very existence of Mankind, the existence of the entire Earth Civilization (1).

Having overcome the nuclear threat to the existence of earthly civilization, humanity found itself in a state of, if not shock, then obvious confusion in the face of the second global threat - the threat of ecological man-made imbalance. Over the endless series of statements about the death of civilization and the prophecies of the timing of its coming, no one in recent years has been able to indicate a way out of this global crisis situation.

However, as F. Engels rightly argued, the needs of society drive science more than hundreds of universities. The paradox in the spirit of Zen Buddhism was that in the absence of a way out, objectively, it already existed. Science of the current century took care of its formulation at the beginning of the century.

In 1913, the young French mathematician E. Cartan published an article, at the end of which he formulated in one phrase a fundamental, as it turned out later, physical concept: in nature there must exist fields generated by the density of angular momentum. In the 1920s, A. Einstein published a number of works in a similar direction. By the 70s, a new field of physics was formed - the Einstein-Cartan theory (TEK), which was part of the theory of torsion fields (torsion fields). In accordance with modern concepts, electromagnetic fields are generated by a charge, gravitational fields - by mass, and torsion fields are generated by spin or angular momentum. Just as any object with mass creates a gravitational field, so any rotating object creates a torsion field.

Torsion fields have a number of unique properties (2). Until the beginning of the 1980s, the manifestation of torsion fields was observed in experiments that did not aim to study precisely torsion phenomena. With the creation of torsion generators, the situation has changed significantly. It became possible to conduct large-scale research to test the predictions of the theory in the planned experiments. Over the past ten years, such studies have been carried out by a number of organizations of the Academies of Sciences (3), laboratories of higher educational institutions and industry organizations in Russia and Ukraine (4).

In particular, in 1986, experiments were successfully carried out on the transmission of binary information through torsion communication channels. The transmission of information in the city at a distance of 22 km without errors was carried out by a transmitter with an electricity consumption of 30 mW.

At the beginning of the century, there was an understanding that electromagnetic fields are force and long-range. Then the ability to generate electric currents and electromagnetic waves appeared. The combination of these fundamental factors has led to the fact that we live in the age of electricity, and it is very difficult to name the tasks of science and the needs of society that would not be solved with the help of electromagnetic devices: electric motors and particle accelerators; Microwave ovens for cooking and computers, electric welding machines and radio telescopes, and much, much more.

At the same time, there was an understanding that gravitational fields are also force and long-range. But until now, no one knows how to make devices that generate gravitational currents and gravitational waves, although attempts to understand theoretically what it is by analogy with electromagnetism have been made repeatedly since the time of Heaviside (5). It is the absence of this "skill" that makes gravity the subject of only theoretical research.

When it was understood that torsion fields are also force and long-range and there are developed sources (generators) of torsion currents and torsion wave radiation, then, by analogy with electromagnetism, it was methodologically acceptable to make a cautious assumption that within the framework of the torsion paradigm one can expect equally broad and dissimilar applied solutions as in the framework of electromagnetism.

Such an analogy might not be valid, even if different torsion effects were to exist. It could turn out that the solution of applied problems on a torsion basis is less effective than on the basis of electromagnetism. True, the uniqueness of the properties of torsion fields, noted above, gave hope that in reality everything is the other way around - torsion means should be more effective: torsion sources of energy, motors, torsion means of transmitting information, torsion methods for obtaining materials with new physical properties, torsion ecology, torsion methods in medicine, agriculture, etc.

For almost ten years since these conclusions were formulated, theoretical, experimental and technological studies in Russia and Ukraine have shown that torsion technologies and means are incomparably more effective than electromagnetic ones. Earlier, the successes of torsion technology in metallurgy were mentioned. However, the agenda is already not about the processing of the melt in a standard smelting process, but about the development of torsion metallurgy, which excludes the smelting stage.

A serious problem is engine-based transport that uses burned fuel - cars, diesel locomotives, ships, airplanes. The transition to electric transport gives rise to the illusion of ecological purity of this "transport of the future". Yes, the air in cities will be cleaner, but at the same time, the low efficiency of power lines and electric motors must be taken into account. Globally, the ecological situation of the Earth will become worse due to the fact that some of the power plants are thermal and because of the environmental hazards of nuclear power plants. At the same time, in addition to the Chernobyl syndrome, there is another danger - a powerful harmful effect of the left torsion fields, which are created by all reactors, on people. At the same time, the existing means of protection of nuclear power plants are transparent to torsion radiation.

Another global problem of our time is the problem of energy sources. Fuel resources, judging by the existing rates of their production and proven reserves, will be depleted in the first half of the next century. But even if we assume that new methods of exploration will significantly increase the explored potential, mankind, without the threat of environmental destruction, cannot afford to burn such an amount of oil and gas. Even if NPPs are made absolutely reliable and equipped with torsion protection (torsion screens), the problem of radioactive waste disposal remains without a fundamental solution. Burial of this waste is not a solution to the problem, but its postponement, the payment for which for our descendants will be the impossibility of a full-fledged existence. The analysis could be continued in relation to other energy sources.

Under these conditions, it would probably be advisable to heed the proposals to consider the physical vacuum as a source of energy, especially since nine International conferences have already taken place on this problem (6). With regard to the possibility of obtaining energy from Vacuum, there is a firm, almost generally accepted judgment: this is fundamentally impossible. But, as is often the case in science, the authors of such categorical denials forget to accompany them with an important methodological comment: this cannot be in accordance with modern scientific ideas, and not in general.

In this regard, it is appropriate to recall that the history of natural science, especially in the 20th century, is full of categorical negations, refuted by the very development of science and technology. Hertz believed that long-distance communication using electromagnetic waves was impossible. N. Bohr considered the practical use of atomic energy unlikely. V. Pauli called the spin idea a stupid idea (which, however, was later refuted by his own works). Ten years before the creation of the atomic bomb, A. Einstein considered it impossible to create atomic weapons. This list could be continued. Apparently, Louis de Broglie was right when he called for periodically subjecting the principles, which were recognized as final, to a deep revision.

Key, basic problems of energy, transport, new materials and information transmission were specially taken as examples of what is potentially possible within the paradigm of torsion fields. This does not exhaust the substantial potential of applied applications of torsion fields, which, as already noted, is no less wide than the range of applied applications of electromagnetism. This means that the contours of the "sum of technologies" of the XXI century "(using the terminology of S. Lem (7) are seen quite clearly. It is this sum of torsion technologies that will largely determine the appearance of the next civilization that will replace the current one.)

Another cardinal direction of the torsion paradigm concerned the problems of biophysics. In particular, the quantum theory of water memory was built, which showed that this memory is realized on the spin proton subsystem of water (8). Simplifying the real picture, we can say that a molecule of some substance, falling into water, with its torsion field orientates the spins of protons (hydrogen nuclei of the water molecule) in the adjacent aqueous medium so that they repeat the characteristic, spatial-frequency structure of the torsion field of this substance molecule. There are experimental grounds to believe that, due to the small radius of action of the static torsion field of the molecules of the substance, only a few layers of their spin proton copies are formed near such molecules.

The intrinsic torsion field of such spin proton copies (spin replicas) will be identical to the torsion field of the substance molecules that generated these spin replicas. Due to this, at the field level, the spin proton copies of the molecules of a substance have the same effect on living objects as the substance itself. At the level of experimental phenomenology in homeopathy, this has been known since the time of Hahnemann (9), then it was investigated on the extensive biochemical material by G.N. Shangin-Berezovsky and coworkers (10), and a little later it was rediscovered by Benvenisto (11).

Another long-standing controversial issue is the problem of "magnetization" of water. The phenomenology consisted in the fact that the experimental result has long been used in practice, but from the point of view of traditional concepts, it cannot exist, since a permanent magnet cannot act on a classical diamagnet - water.

Experimentally, during magnetization, along with the magnetic field, a torsion field inevitably arises. The presence of a torsion field in magnets was never assumed and, naturally, was never taken into account. Two conclusions follow from this. First, if the magnetic field of a permanent magnet cannot and does not have an effect on a diamagnet - water, then its torsion field, polarizing the proton subsystem of water along the spins, transforms water into another spin state, which determines the change in its physicochemical properties and changes the nature of its biological action. From this point of view, it is correct to speak not about "magnetization" of water, but about "otsioning" or about torsional polarization of water. The last statement is not correct enough. Torsion polarization provides a rigorous justification for changing the properties of water itself, but this does not at all exclude the mechanism of action of a magnetic field on salts containing chemical elements with magnetic properties.

Secondly, preliminary experimental studies have shown a positive effect of the right torsion field on biological objects and a negative effect of the left one *. Therefore, when the north pole of the magnet, that is, the right torsion field, acts on the water, the biological activity of the water increases. When exposed to the south pole of the magnet, i.e. the left torsion field, the biological activity of the water decreases. Similarly, when the north pole of the applicator magnet acts, its therapeutic effect is observed, since in reality the action is carried out due to its right torsion field. Under the action of the south pole of the applicator magnet, the painful state intensifies.

The third mystery of biophysical phenomenology is the Voll drug rewrite technique. The essence of the problem is as follows. Two test tubes are taken, one with a drug solution, and the other with an aqueous distillate. Then one end of the copper wire is wrapped around one test tube in several turns, and the other end of the wire is also wrapped around the second. After some time, under the conditions of a double-blind experiment, it is established that water from a test tube with a distillate (an imaginary solution) has the same therapeutic effect as a true drug solution. In this case, it turns out that the length of the wire does not significantly affect the observed effect.

The assumption about the electromagnetic nature of the “recording of properties” of the drug on water fell away when it turned out that the effect of rewriting persists even if instead of a copper wire we take an optical fiber. The situation took on a completely incomprehensible character, when it turned out that if you place a magnet on a wire or fiber optic, the effect of rewriting completely disappears. It is the last circumstance - the effect of a magnet on a diamagnet (which is impossible within the framework of electromagnetism, as already noted), which testified that torsion (spin) effects are the basis of rewriting.

Let us pay special attention to a number of important consequences of the drug rewrite effect. The therapeutic effect of an imaginary solution - spin-polarized water - poses a new problem. An imaginary solution can have a therapeutic effect only through its field (torsion) properties. At the same time, it is traditionally believed that drugs have a therapeutic effect through a biochemical mechanism. Secondly, if imaginary solutions are as effective as drug salts, then, possibly, in the future, the torsion technology of rewriting with the help of torsion generators will make it possible, on the one hand, to abandon the production of expensive drugs and make pharmaceuticals extremely cheap. On the other hand, the use of imaginary solutions reduces the problem of drug toxicosis, especially with regard to drugs for long-term and, which is especially important, drugs for lifelong use by patients. When treating with imaginary solutions, no "chemistry" enters the body. However, from these general considerations to mass application, certain efforts of scientists and practitioners will be required.

Thirdly, if the imaginary solution has a therapeutic effect through its field (torsion) properties, then, naturally, the question arises: maybe, in general, abandon the water mediator (imaginary solution) and act on the body directly by the torsion field of the drug? The possibility is not excluded that at least in a number of situations this will be possible.

One of the most complex spin systems is man. The complexity of his spatial-frequency torsion field is determined by the huge set of chemicals in his body and the complexity of their distribution in it, as well as the complex dynamics of biochemical transformations in the process of exchange. Each person can be considered as a source (generator) of a strictly individual torsion field. Due to the factors already discussed, a person, with his background (natural) torsion field, carries out (for the vast majority of people involuntarily) spin polarization of the surrounding space in a certain finite radius. His torsion field, including information about the state of his health, leaves its copy (spin replica) both on clothes and on the Physical Vacuum.

The spin imprint of the torsion field on one person's clothes turns out to be significant for another person if he wears these clothes. In order to eliminate this influence, it is necessary to subject such clothing to spin torsion depolarization. With torsion generators, this procedure is quick and easy. Old signs about the undesirability of wearing clothes "from someone else's shoulder", it turns out, have a completely reasonable justification. These findings apply equally to other things, paintings, instruments, etc.

The overwhelming majority of people have a background right torsion field. It is extremely rare, in a ratio of the order of 106: 1, to meet people with a background left torsion field. The background static torsion field of a person generally has a fairly stable value. However, at the same time, it was found that with its own right torsion field, the breath was held on exhalation even for 1 min. The intensity of this field almost doubles. When holding the breath while inhaling, the sign of this field changes - the new torsion field becomes left.

These factors, as well as the similarity of the properties of torsion fields to that shown by psychics, gave grounds to assume that long-distance distant effects of psychics are realized through torsion fields. The difference between a sensitive person and an ordinary person is that he can cause altered states in himself, in which he himself becomes a source of a torsion field of a given spatial-frequency structure. In practice, the sensitive does not use these scientific categories. He empirically selects the altered state in which a positive therapeutic effect is observed. Usually, a psychic, starting to work with a new patient, uses some basic altered state characteristic of the sensory treatment of a given disease, which he modifies for each specific case. There is reason to believe that a similar algorithm is being implemented in the case of a priest.

In order to test the correctness of the assumption about the torsional nature of sensory phenomenology, a large number of experimental studies have been carried out over the past five years. First, many experiments on the effect of torsion radiation generators on various physical, chemical and biological objects were duplicated by a group of sensitives - Yu. A. Petushkov, N. P. and A. V. Baev in research at the Lviv State University. In all cases, their extrasensory effects were consistently reproducible and demonstrated the same and often stronger effects than those under the action of torsion generators.

Studies have been conducted on the effects of sensitives and on various biological systems. These experiments also showed consistent results. Of particular interest was the objective registration of the effect of the sensitives on the subjects by the electroencephalogram (EEG) of the brain with the mapping of the brain according to different rhythms. At the same time, the methods generally accepted in the world practice and serial equipment for brain mapping by EEG were used. An example of recorded changes in the L-rhythm with observation intervals of 20 minutes. showed that the corrective actions of sensitives ultimately, in standard terminology, give a "butterfly", that is, a symmetrical picture of the left and right hemispheres. Probably the first domestic publication on such studies was the work of I.S.Dobronravova and I.N. Lebedeva (12).

An important point of these experiments was that the subject was in a shielded chamber (Faraday chamber), which excluded the electromagnetic effect of sensitives if it took place.

The established torsional nature of the action of sensitives led to spin glass models used to describe brain mechanisms (13), starting with the early work of Little and Hopfield (14). The spin glass model is quite constructive, although it has disadvantages known to specialists (like any model, not a rigorous theory).

As a first approximation, let us abstract from the macrostructure of the brain and the differentiation of its cells. We will assume that the brain is an amorphous medium (“glass”) with freedom in the dynamics of spin structures. Then it is permissible to assume that as a result of acts of thinking, the accompanying biochemical processes generate molecular structures that are, like spin systems, sources of the torsion field, and their spatial-frequency structure adequately (probably even identically) reflects these acts of thinking.

In the presence of an external torsion field, under its action in the labile spin system - the brain, spin structures arise that repeat the spatial-frequency structure of the acting external torsion field. These emerging spin structures are reflected as images or sensations at the level of consciousness, or as control signals for certain physiological functions.

The constructed heuristic model is just a key to research. Without a doubt, the results of such studies will reveal a much more complex picture. Note that the use of the spin glass model based on the theory of torsion fields transfers experiments with the transfer of information through a perceptual channel - the transfer of images from an inductor to a percipient (15) from the field of phenomenology to the field of science. Now, let it be based on a model, but it becomes possible to analyze these experiments at the level of physical processes, which has not been possible for almost 20 years (16).

Within the framework of the formulated concepts, one can say from a physical point of view what a "biofield" is. First, we note that the orthodox representatives of the natural sciences, when pronouncing the term "biofield" or "radioaesthetic radiation", proudly and categorically say that physics knows four interactions - strong, weak, gravitational and electromagnetic. (This, of course, is true, taking into account the need to add a "fifth force" - torsion interactions.) They feel victorious when supporters of the existence of biofields shyly retreat as soon as they are asked to give a specific physical characteristic of biofields.

Indeed, as already noted, in the overwhelming majority of cases (let's put it so carefully), the primary sources of fields are elementary particles that make up all atoms - common to the living world and the inert world. Therefore, indeed, science operates with a single system of fields (interactions) for all of Nature - there cannot be only "biological" fields. The difference between the biological (living) and the "world of minerals" can be observed (exist) only at the level of the systemic manifestation of known physical fields.

However, the term "geophysical fields" has existed in physics for many decades and does not cause categorical objections. This means a set of known physical fields that have a specific combination for geophysical environments (objects). From these positions established in physics and the concepts developed here, it is fair to speak of biofields, meaning by them a set of known physical fields in their specific combination for living objects. (This approach was developed by Prof. GN Dulnev.) And the odious term “biofield” (not biofield) should be replaced by the term “torsion fields”, which adequately describes extrasensory (parapsychological) phenomenology (17 ).

The concept of torsion fields and the spin glass model allow us to approach the solution of yet another problem of extrasensory phenomenology. A number of sensitives claim that they "see" the fields, just as thermal radiation from a person can be seen on a thermal imager. At the same time, as sensitives assert, the "picture" appears in the mind regardless of whether the eyes are open or not. Within the framework of the developed concepts of the "induction" of spin states in a spin glass (brain) under the action of an external torsion field from any source, the statement about the "vision" of torsion radiation does not seem meaningless.

In recent years, several series of dissimilar experiments have been carried out to investigate this problem. In particular, sensitives with "vision" were presented with torsion sources with a complex three-dimensional multi-beam torsion radiation pattern. Sensitives "with vision" painted with absolute certainty the true spatial structure of torsion radiation. Likewise, with absolute certainty, the sensitives without hand movements are distant; a) installed, turned on or off the torsion generator; b) set the radiation mode of the left or right torsion field; c) the spatial structure of the radiation pattern of the torsion generator was drawn.

It is useful to note that the halo at the head of the saints on the icons is a torsion field, sketched according to the descriptions of those who have “visions”.

As follows from the works of Abrams (USA), performed more than 40 years ago, and which has been justified in experiments already today, during ordinary photography in the visible and infrared ranges, the torsion field of all photographed objects is recorded on slides along the spins of the emulsion. If a person is photographed, then, in addition to his appearance, his torsion field is recorded in the spin structure of the emulsion. Since the torsion field of a person and his torsion field in the photograph are identical, it is clear that for a sensitive person with "vision" there is no difference between the diagnosis of the person himself and the diagnosis based on his photograph.

At present, it is in principle possible to visualize torsion fields by technical means. Photo visualization has been experimentally studied by many researchers (Kasyanov V.V., Karpov N.K., Okhatrin A.F., Okhatrin F.A., Krokhalev G.P., etc.). Work in this direction is now being effectively continued.

1. Dmitriev A.N. Technogenic challenge to the planet Earth // Bulletin of the higher school. 1986. No. 7.

2. Torsion fields can be generated not only by spin. They can be generated by geometric and topological shapes ("shape effect"). They can be self-generated and are always generated by electromagnetic fields. Torsion radiation has a high penetrating ability and, like gravity, passes through natural media without attenuation, that is, they cannot be shielded by natural materials. The speed of torsion waves is not less than 109 km / s, that is, a billion times the speed of light. The torsion field potential for a source with radiation does not depend on the distance. Unlike electromagnetism, where like charges repel, like torsion charges are attracted. Spin-polarized media and Physical Vacuum as a result of the action of a torsion field form stable metastable spin states.

3. Mayboroda V.P., Akimov A.E., Maksimova G.A., Tarasenko V.Ya. Influence of torsion fields on tin melt. M .: ISTC VENT, 1994. Prepr. No. 49; Sokolova V.A. Investigation of the reaction of plants to the effect of torsion radiation. M .: ISTC VENT, 1994. Prepr. No. 48; Akimov A.E., Kurik M.V., Tarasenko V.Ya. Influence of the torsion field on the crystallization process of micellar structures // Biotechnology. 1991. No. 3.

4. In 1989, at the Institute of Problems of Materials Science of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, an ultradispersed (amorphous) metal was obtained during slow cooling and in the bulk of an ingot as a result of the action of torsion radiation on the melt (Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, VM Maiboroda). It is useful to note that metals obtained using torsion technology are structurally and in terms of their field characteristics very close to alloys, which are assumed to be related to UFOs, and which more than 10 years ago were studied in a number of academic organizations in Russia and Ukraine.

5. Carstoin J. Contributions to the theories of electromagnetism and gravitation // Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie. 1986, V. 11, No. 2. Pt 1; No. 3. Pt. 2. Brillouin L., Relativity Reexamined. N.Y .: Academic Press, 1970.

6. Nieper H.A. Revolution in Technology, Medicine and Society. Conversion of Gravity Field Energy. Olderberg, MIT Verlag. 1985; The Mannual of Free Energy Devices and Systems Complied by D. A. Kelly. Burbank, Cal. 1986. Publ. N 1269 / F 269; Covegno Internationale: “Quale Fisica per 2000?” Bologna. 1991.

7. Lem S. The sum of technologies. M .: Mir. 1968.

8. Bingi V.N. Induction of metastable states of water in the framework of the concept of a torsion field. M .: ISTC VENT. Prepr. No. 3.

9. Hahnemann S. Organon of medical art / Per. with him. SPb., 1884. See also: Hahnemann S. Experience of a new principle for finding the healing properties of medicinal substances with some views on the old principles / Per. with him. SPb., 1896.

10. Shangin-Berezovsky G.N., Lazareva N.Yu. The possibility of replacing mineral fertilizers with water with the memory of them for the development of plants. M .: ISTC VENT, 1991. Prepr. No. 9.

11. Benveniste J. et al. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE // Nature. 1988. No. 333.

* Experiments have shown a violation of the conductivity of cell membranes under the action of the left torsion field. See also: Sokolova V.A. Investigation of the response of plants to impact: torsion radiation. M .: ISTC VENT, 1994. Prepr. No. 48.

12. Lebedeva N.N., Dobronravova I.S. Organization of EEG rhythms in special states of consciousness // Zhurn. higher nervous activity. 1990. T. 40, no. 5.

13. Sampolinsky X. Statistical mechanics of neural networks // Physics abroad. Ser. A., M .: Mir, 1991.

14. Little W.A. The Existance ol Persistence States in the Brain // Math. Biosci. 1974. V. 19. No. 1-2; Hopfield J.J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities // Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA). 1982. V. 79, No. 8.

15. Puthoff, Targ. Perceptual channel of information transmission over long distances: History of the issue - recent research // TIIER. 1976. No. 3.

16. Jan R.G. Ageless paradox of psychophysical phenomena: an engineering approach // TIIER. 1982. No. 3.

17. Moskovsky A.V., Mirzalis I.V. Consciousness and the physical world. M.: ISTC VENT. 1993. Prepr. No. 42; Bingi V.N., Akimov A.E. About physics and psychophysics. M .: ISTC VENT, 1992. Prepr. No. 35; Akimov A.E., Bingi V.N. Computers, the brain and the Universe as a physical problem. M .: ISTC VENT, 1993. Prepr. No. 36.

God exists, and we can observe the manifestation of his will. This is the opinion of many scientists, they do not just believe in the Creator, but rely on some knowledge

Today, even if a small part of famous scientists - biologists, physicists, astronomers - are sure that when the world came into being, it was not without a Creator. Painfully, we develop according to complex laws in order to explain everything by evolutionary processes. This is the opinion of Anatoly Akimov, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Director of the International Institute for Theoretical and Applied Physics, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences.

- Anatoly Evgenievich, what is the attitude of today's “fathers” of the Russian Academy of Sciences to religion?

Officially, the President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Yuri Osipov expresses the opinion that there is no reason to assert that there is no God. But I'm not sure if this point of view is universal in the academy. For example, the Nobel laureate physicist Ginzburg completely denies both the Creator and religion. He believes that science does not need the concept of God at all. Moreover, I do not think that the position shown by the leaders of the RAS is sincere. Something tells me that this is a tribute to the conjuncture. The President of the country believes, and we believe ...

However, God exists, and we can observe the manifestation of his will. This is the opinion of many scientists, they do not just believe in the Creator, but rely on some knowledge.

- Did the great scientists of the past who discovered classical physics for us believe in God?

There are many. Until the time of Isaac Newton, there was no separation between science and religion. The priests were engaged in science, because they were the most educated people. Newton himself had a theological education and often repeated: "I derive the laws of mechanics from the laws of God." Later, with the development of mathematics, experimental physics, science branched off from religion. Although the latest work on the physical vacuum confirms that, by and large, there are no contradictions between them.

Kant at one time put forward 6 proofs of the existence of God. Is there a “seventh proof” of modern science, the same physics?

When about 300 years ago, scientists invented a microscope and began to study what is happening inside the cell, the processes of duplication and division of chromosomes caused a stunning reaction in them: “How could this be if all this was not provided by the Almighty ?!”

Indeed, if we talk about the fact that man appeared on Earth as a result of evolution, then, taking into account the frequency of mutations and the speed of biochemical processes, it would take much more time to create a man from primary cells than the age of the Universe itself. Let's take physical constants that uniquely define the structure of our world: gravitational, magnetic, radius of Bohr's orbit, etc.

About 30 years ago, one of the scientists showed that if these constants were changed by at least 1% (and they were measured with an accuracy of 10 to 30 decimal places), the world would be unstable, there would be no nuclei and electronic orbits ... The same can be said about space. Why do the planets rotate in strictly specified orbits, and not in any one? In general, the world in which we live is organized according to complex laws, and constants also determine its stability.

- It turns out that God is a brilliant physicist?

In the 80s of the last century, a rather curious event took place in science. A book has appeared in which it was predicted what will happen in the world in 20 years, that is, at the beginning of the 21st century. The book was not written by a physicist or an expert in scientific forecasting. It was written by the famous science fiction writer Stanislav Lem. It was called "The Sum of Technology".

The writer predicted how scientific and technical relations would develop in the 21st century. One of the sections of the book was called "God as a super-computer." It posed the following question: if God is a thinking substance, then for this supermind there are no restrictions in creative activity: be it in the creation of man or the Universe.

Since the beginning of the 80s, we have been working on the ether, or, as it is now called, the physical vacuum. What is physical vacuum? It is a material environment that permeates all space, incl. what is between the nucleus and the electron in the atom ...

- Wait, where does the space come from if the atom itself is 0.0?

Just about, it is traditionally believed that the world is a dense substance. In fact, the situation is more complicated. Take the simplest hydrogen atom, which has one proton and one single electron. If we hypothetically increase the size of an atom so that its nucleus (proton) becomes the size of a soccer ball, then the radius of the electron's orbit in this case will be commensurate with the height of the Moscow State University, and all the intermediate space is empty ...

- It turns out that Democritus was right when he asserted that the world consists of atoms and emptiness?

Undoubtedly right! The concept of a dense substance is very conditional. However, let's return to the physical vacuum. We managed to find out very important circumstances. Calculations were performed that showed that the number of quantum elements in the volume of the radio-observable Universe cannot be less than 10155 and it cannot but possess a superintelligence. If all this is a single system, then, considering it as a computer, we ask: what is beyond the power of a computing system with so many elements? This is unlimited possibilities, more than the most sophisticated and modern computer in a disproportionate number of times! And one more thing: how to manage this system? After all, it “works”, develops! It takes 1015 light years for light to travel from one end of the universe to the other at a speed of 300,000 km per second.

If the signal from point A to point B takes so long, billions of years will pass by our earthly standards, then all sense of guiding such a system disappears. But it turns out that in this environment the signals propagate instantly, in 0 s! The system as a whole could not have existed if such a condition had not been met in it. And it is being fulfilled! At any moment in time, the Creator can manifest his will in the most distant corner of the Universe! What was called by various philosophers the Universal Mind, the Absolute, is the superpowerful system, which we identify with the potential capabilities of the Almighty.

- But in the Bible somehow everything is written differently ...

This does not contradict the basic tenets of the Bible. It, in particular, says that God is omnipresent, he is always and everywhere present. We see that this is so: the Lord has unlimited possibilities of influencing everything that happens. As you can see, everything is done instantly, in 0 s.

Then in the form of whom does God exist in our common understanding? During his school days, in atheism textbooks he was portrayed as an old man standing on a cloud ...

In the form of a person, you can depict the Son of God - Jesus Christ. And if we talk about God the Father ... This is a thinking Universe. Tsiolkovsky also spoke about this, suggesting that the Creator does not have a human image. Although the Creator is able to incarnate in any face, his possibilities are unlimited. However, we are not aware of cases when such a need arose. When it was necessary to solve “human problems”, he sent Jesus Christ to Earth. Again I will refer to the Bible, which says that God is omnipresent.

- How does the church relate to scientists who provide a “scientific basis” for the existence of the Creator?

Several years ago, the Vatican asked famous scientists to scientifically prove the existence of the Creator. As far as I know, such works are regularly submitted to the Pope. A scientific commission to explain divine miracles (in particular, myrrh-streaming icons), with the blessing of the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, was also created under the Orthodox Church. However, we still have problems in relations.

One of the cornerstones of religion is the requirement to believe in God unconditionally. And as soon as something has to be proved, explained, a response arises: if you doubt, then you fall into sin, you need to be excommunicated. But scientists are arranged in such a way (and by the Creator himself!) That they love to reach the truth in everything! At one time, the famous scientist Paracelsus said: "What in one century is considered superstition, in another century is already a scientific truth." In ancient times, people were afraid of lightning, they associated it with Zeus. Today "dischargers" are demonstrated in all schools.

- Probably, it says that there is no God ...

This suggests that we are already in a position to understand some particular manifestations. And the Lord created the world in such a way that these phenomena occur. They just become a field of knowledge. In general, I am convinced that the world is predetermined, there is nothing accidental in it. As one of Bulgakov's heroes said, a brick does not accidentally fall on his head. Everything is predetermined by the Almighty.

- Did you come to this conclusion on your own experience?

You can say so. When, in the early 1980s, I was considering the structure of the physical vacuum that I proposed, I often asked the question: what was not known to my fellow physicists until the moment I understood it? It turned out that all this could have been done back in the 40s! And it was done in the 80s. There always comes a moment when an apple falls on Newton's head. When my colleagues share their joy - invented something, received experimental results, I always say: “Moderate your self-importance! If you did it, then Heaven thought it pleased them. You just were given to do it! ”

- Speaking of Heaven. If the Creator is a supermind, then where are heaven and hell?

According to religious beliefs, people associate heaven with heaven, and hell with the underground, where sinners are tormented in cauldrons of boiling tar. Such hypothetical assumptions, expressed in a figurative form, have quite real physical categories. - ? - In addition to magnetic and gravitational fields, there is also a torsion field in nature, which is more general. These manifestations are called "the subtle world" or "the space of subtle vibrations."

- Do you mean parallel worlds?

I would not use such a term. You and I do not see electromagnetic waves or gravitational fields. However, no one says that these are parallel worlds. If people do not see something, this does not mean that the phenomenon occurs in another dimension. Everything is in our dimension and permeates each other. But there is also the concept of the human soul. What we call the soul are structures that are of a field torsion nature. When a person dies, they say that the soul has left him. Life after death is a manifestation of the existence of these field structures. Each such structure is aware of itself as a person's personality, although in reality it is a clot of the field.

If a person was dominated by a righteous lifestyle - he perfected himself, did good deeds - education, called the soul, has one structure. And he finds himself in the same conditions, in paradise. If a person is sinful, committed crimes, degraded, after death his soul falls into other conditions that correspond to hell. The sky and the underground are some conventions. In fact, this is an environment for two types of souls, but their meaning is correct, it corresponds to canonical ideas.

In hell, sinners are punished and tortured in every way. Since the devil is one of the former archangels, he also has unlimited possibilities. It only directs them to evil. Countering the dark forces is an extremely difficult problem. It is better to stay away from them. Hell, although not in the underworld, does not change its meaning. Remember what the Gospel says: love one another - and that will be enough!

Anatoly AKIMOV was born in 1938 in Moscow, his parents were students of the tank faculty of the Moscow Higher Technical School. Bauman. There could be no question of christening a child during the period of Stalinist repressions. Anatoly Evgenievich was baptized at the age of 55. - Did you believe in God? the priest asked him when he came to church. - No, I just realized that he could not be! he replied. By that time, Anatoly Akimov had already defended his doctoral dissertation and was actively engaged in the theory of the torsion field. Many people believe that if today there are "flying saucers", then they work on torsion propellers.

Previous reviews from site visitors:

October 9 17:03, Tatiana:

October 10 14:27, Valery:

In fact, many instinctively understand that God exists, but do not want to believe, because this will force them to change their lives and views. Many hate God for this. And the majority have a blind hope for infinite mercy - they say, God will forgive. Only at the approach of death does the soul begin to tremble and rush, but few are already capable of true repentance. So people close to us leave one after another, and we only think about the eternal at the grave, and then worldly life - and again we do lawlessness without looking back. This is the result of the destruction of our Fatherland and traditions, and at the same time, the destruction of the Fatherland is the result of falling away from faith and God.

July 10 19:26, Site visitor:

Anatoly Akimov was baptized in Orthodoxy (apparently, though not explicitly said), but expresses non-Christian judgments. In particular, it identifies the Creator and creation, that is, God and the universe. He tries to describe the phenomena of the spiritual world (soul) in physical terms of the surrounding world, although any Orthodox know that this world is not eternal and will be destroyed in due time, and souls are eternal. His scientific views have little in common with science, this has been repeatedly proven.

December 16 00:57, Lena:

what is horrible and no specifics ..

June 14 09:04, Nikolay:

flights in a dream

The chicken seems to be a bird, but does not fly. So it is with some physicists. They would have a torsion propeller! At worst, a feather in the ass.

November 28 13:45, nina:

A.E. Akimov about God

I was lucky to hear Anatoly Evgenievich. At the same time, I loved his intelligence and the amazing simplicity and persuasiveness of his argumentation. I am not a physicist, but a philologist. I believe in the existence of the Most High. He is in the Word = Logos! And torsion fields are also information ... I am glad that the time has finally come when religion and science again begin to create a person together, uniting him into a single whole: PERSON = SPIRIT + SOUL + BODY.

November 19 16:21, Valentine:

About a human

You've probably heard the expression \ "Spark of God \"? Nowadays, scientists and religions claim that in a person / and not only in a person, but in any physical body or object / there is a Spark of God. And if we take into account the fact that, when explaining Mr. Akimov, there is space between the proton and the electron and it is filled with a physical vacuum, then this is precisely what confirms the fact that God is a thinking and creating physical vacuum and is omnipresent. This does not contradict the Bible, but explains our Genesis. People, look around - how do we live and sin? All our actions, both good and bad, are recorded in our cells and therefore, when leaving this life, we will definitely have to bear responsibility for everything that we have done. Repent! I wish you health and love. For God is love.

November 27 20:59, Valentine:

About hell and heaven

I have read many times in the literature that the Earth is called "purgatory". And in one of the books written by scientists and in which a lot of attention was paid to spirituality and the soul, it was written that there is no greater punishment for the soul than to clothe it in a physical body. Throughout life, a person suffers from various diseases and bears on his own skin all the hardships and hardships from the lies and injustice of others. I thought a lot about this and came to the conclusion that since I live now on Earth, I am now in hell and I really need to repent of all my sins and try to correct my mistakes. And then, when my hour of death comes, God will no longer send me to this beautiful Earth, which is hell. I am not trying to convince anyone, but only expressed my point of view. I wish you all good health, and everything else can be bought for money.

February 4 14:47,:

About God the Creator, Zeno and cosmological delusions.

In order to represent the INITIAL UNLIMITED SPACE (outl. BP-o) it is ELEMENTALLY (El-tno) complete, it is NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT (NID-o) to postulate the presence in it of two Els with SIMPLY and DIFFICULT / closed systemically manifested (ESSENCE -yam) /, and for the representation of int. BP-a heterogeneous El-tno completed NID-o postulate the presence in it of another El-ta - the Most High and Almighty God - who has an open systemically manifested Ssh-. It is not difficult to assume that already with the NID-minimum increment of the INMATERIAL COMPONENT (not-oh Ss-her) Ssch-and God - the Spirit of God - NID-o minimally descending directionally constantly deployed from the M-oh Ss-she Ssch-and God occurs overcoming the counter-manifestation of His Ssch-and as a result of the disintegration of Ssch-her is SIMPLE and DIFFICULT due to blocking the ascending direction of the constantly deployed Ss-their Ssch-hers. On the basis of the M-s Ss-them from the former SIMPLY and DIFFICULT God unfold Ssch-but opposing ones (Adam is initially opposed by angels, including Satan, who has not yet manifested) El-you derived BP-a. / the rest is set out in the final version of "The shortest philosophy of being" /

Concluding Zeno's undertakings on the example of the paradoxes of the versatile shown the absurdity of applying the METHOD OF VELOCATED DENIAL (MZO) to the sphere of sensually comprehended, based on identification with the mathematical point Cc of this sphere, Lemaître sanctioned the legitimacy of the application of MZO to the sphere of the intelligible! The balance in comprehension of both spheres, disturbed by the statements of the Eleets, was "restored" thanks to the assumptions of the Belgian priest-physicist ... Without understanding the essence of the aporias, it is difficult to resist the scientific interpretation of the cosmological question!

Zeno revealed a picture of discrediting both the sphere of the SENSUALLY ACCEPTABLE objective / Rel. No. 2 /, as recorded in RELATIONS (Rel. could keep those who easily operate fixed in Relation # 2 from trying:

1.Discrediting the Relative with Cs of the sphere of the OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE / Relative No. 1 / and their representing BP with the concepts of "isotropic homogeneity", "singularity" that do not meet the requirements of the principle qualitatively and quantitatively. out of BP-a - this is the basis for cosmology.

2. extrapolation of the fixed in Rel. No. 2 to Rel-I No. 1 - so by means of concepts that are false for Rel-I No. 1, but true for Rel-I No. 2, the superstructure of cosmology is deployed. It is not surprising that the LHC (large android collider), which has sunk into hopelessness, should have become the evidence base for such a "science".

March 2 23:13, Huseyn Gurbanov, Baku, Azerbaijan:

Summary of the article "About God the Creator, Zeno and cosmological delusions":

1. During the DEPLOYMENT (DEVELOPMENT) of the extension of the Spirit of God beyond the level of initial development, there is a revelation of the minimally numerically heterogeneous El-homogeneity (ord-and No. 1) and God on the basis of the inactive M- ss-them from oRd-i No. 1 develops minimally heterogeneous with his Ssch-th maximally numerically El-t homogeneity (oRd-b No. 2), the process of which will begin at a time known to God (which is the moment of reaching the goal rV-niya oRd-i No. 2), which began from the moment of completion of the development oRd-i No. 2. With the return of the extension of the Spirit to the level of the initial development, ORD # 1 develops again - the potential of God for the transformation of Ord-i No. 1 into Ord-i No. 2 and Ord-i No. 2 into Ord-s No. 1 is unlimited! "Big Bang" is one of a series of atheistic absurdities!

2. The existence of God is not scientifically provable; manifestations of God Ssch-and are not recorded in Rel-yah №2!

June 21 02:04, Huseyn Gurbanov, Baku, Azerbaijan:

Laconic about the human essence.

MANIFESTATIONS / constituting an entity / person in:

1. Subject to status for them sensually comprehended relations FIX (F-comfort) MANIFESTATIONS of the Earth in FORMS / their quantitative representation /: at the end of the series in utero, i.e. not directly from the surface of the Earth F-uem, FORM / from the MINIMUM POSSIBLE (MnmV-th) FORM / Mn1 / to the MAXIMUM POSSIBLE (MsV-th) FORM / Mk1 // birth is the beginning of a series directly from the surface of the Earth F-um form / from Mn2 according to Mk2 / at the end of which death is based on the beginning of the series directly in the surface of the Earth F-uemic FORMs / from Mn3 to Mk3 /.

2. appropriately status for them intelligible relations of F-uema / as F-uye MANIFESTATION of the Earth / MANIFESTATION of angels and Satan assigned to the human individual.

In persons with disturbances in the mechanism of F-tion (in those suffering from Down's disease, etc.) in the row from Mn2 to Mk2 there is no MnmV-th FORM of the proYa-th Earth providing self-nourishment for a human individual / Mn4 /: in identical twins, regardless of distance to which they are removed from each other in life. F-u are almost identical to Mn4. Those who mistakenly take Mn4 as the beginning of a number of FORMs yearn for an imaginary F-tion of the illusory Mk4 - they become hotbeds of the delusional idea of ​​achieving world domination and immortality: obsessed with the mirage direction to Mk4, they do not understand that they are following only to Mk2 from which death transfers to Mn3 and, therefore, not leave wills at all! The Koran, obliging to distribute your property in advance before leaving this world, clearly outlines the path of the true believer, thereby protecting from the misfortune of being charged with delusional ideas.

“It has been prescribed to you, when death approaches any of you, and he leaves behind goodness, to leave a will to parents and next of kin on reasonable terms. This is the duty of the God-fearing ”(Surah Al-Bakara, ayat 180).

(to be continued)

Investigator of torsion fields - A. E. Akimov

V.A. Chudinov

Unfortunately, Anatoly Evgenievich Akimov (1938-2007), the discoverer and researcher of torsion fields and the creator of torsion installations, passed away. His bright life was an example of selfless service to science and the creation of something new, contrary to the prevailing scientific opinion.

Anatoly Evgenievich Akimov (1938-2007)

I cannot say that I knew AE Akimov intimately, although during our meetings we asked each other about matters. Naturally, as a graduate of the physics department of Moscow State University, I was always interested in new directions in physics. Immediately after graduation, I became the scientific secretary of the group of philosophical problems of physics at the Moscow Society of Naturalists, where the concepts of the physics of the microworld by Akulov, Veinik, Gerlovin, Protodyakonov and others were discussed. One of the active members of the group was the author of "Aetherodynamics" Atsyukovsky, and the head of the physics group was the author of the concept of longitudinal electromagnetic oscillations and the doublet structure of a photon, Lev Aleksandrovich Druzhkin. So we were aware of all the new things in physics.

Later, as part of the group of Doctor of Biological Sciences Gurtovoy, where I dealt with the philosophical problems of the subtle world, at a number of conferences I repeatedly met with A.E. Akimov. I was fascinated by his successes, although I had only heard about everything. I did not see a single torsion generator with my own eyes, not in photographs, or in drawings, so that of the non-state researchers, its installations were the most secret. However, when faced with people from his environment, I knew that they exist and work successfully.; the researchers also noted that staying in the zone of their action at first greatly increases the activity of the body, its bioenergetics, but by the end of the day this energy “rolls over”, and people feel not just tired, but literally squeezed out like a lemon. Even then, I was surprised why the laboratories did not provide for various absorbers of this energy, why the laboratory staff were not shielded. Another thing became clear: even in the presence of fantastic health, contact with the generators of torsion fields will inevitably lead to early death. Unfortunately, the inventor himself, who died of cancer, was not saved either.

Back in the late 80s A.E. Akimov spoke about such successes in the use of torsion generators as the production of metallic glasses. As is known from solid state physics, any substance in a solid state of aggregation is certainly ordered, and is either a single crystal (the Institute of Crystallography of the Russian Academy of Sciences specialized in growing single crystals of various substances), or a polycrystal. Metals are typical polycrystals. But there is a rare exception - a completely disordered substance - glass. Physicists prefer to consider it as a supercooled liquid, which under certain conditions is capable of crystallization (in the process of the so-called "vitrification"). By irradiating metals with torsion fields, Akimov succeeded in destroying their ordered state (long-range order) and creating a metal with disordered molecules. At the same time, its physical properties changed dramatically: their conductor became an insulator, from a heat-conducting substance - a heat-preserving one. These and many other achievements of A.E. Akimov, if they were confirmed by other scientists and entered into scientific practice, they would transform physics (and, as a consequence, our everyday life) so much that they would certainly be noted with outstanding awards, including several Nobel Prizes.

But this did not happen. And just the opposite happened: first of all, against Akimov and his followers at the Russian Academy of Sciences, a "Commission to Combat Pseudoscience" was created. I will quote a small fragment from the book of the chairman of this commission, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences E.P. Kruglyakova: “ MR. AKIMOV AND DR. In 1995, in Tomsk, a collection was published under the intriguing title "Exploratory experimental research in the field of spin-torsion interactions" ... Is it possible to take the publications in this collection seriously? Ten years earlier, under a veil of deep secrecy in Moscow, under the State Committee on Science and Technology of the USSR, the Center for Non-Traditional Technologies was created. A certain A.E. was put at the head of the center. Akimov. The work was generously funded through the Military-Industrial Commission under the Council of Ministers of the USSR, the Ministry of Defense, the KGB of the USSR and some other departments. The wave of the Chernetsky generator inspired Mr. Akimov to carry out an exciting research program ... When the secret nevertheless became clear, the Department of General Physics and Astronomy of the USSR Academy of Sciences turned to the Committee of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR with a strong protest about state support for quackery. On July 4, 1991, the decree "On the vicious practice of financing pseudoscientific research from state sources" was adopted. A large-scale scam was slammed. The state lost 500 million full-weight rubles on this."(KRU, p. 52-53). From this very hostile A.E. A number of conclusions can be drawn to Akimov of the fragment.

First of all, it becomes clear why Akimov did not show anything to anyone. If he really collaborated with the military, then not only his installations, but also all theoretical developments that were of an applied nature, automatically became secret and top secret. So, with all his desire, he had no right to demonstrate anything. Further, here the continuity is reported: it turned out that the generator of the torsion fields was not developed by him, but by Chernetsky. I also saw this researcher at conferences, although I was not familiar with him. Unfortunately, even then Chernetsky had a huge tumor on his face, as I assumed, of an oncological nature. He died a year later. It follows that generators of torsion fields have claimed more than one life of their researchers.

But most importantly, it became clear to me why he turned to the military aspect of the use of fields - to the effect of torsion generators on enemy troops. The fact is that from his employees I constantly heard complaints about extremely meager funding; and this despite the fact that the funds were still allocated. Let me remind you that in all countries funding for elementary particle physics has always been insufficient, and Werner Heisenberg, director of the Max Planck Physics Institute in Berlin, in order to get at least some funds during World War II for the maintenance of his institute, offered the military the chimerical "destruction of enemy aircraft with a stream of charged particles from the accelerator. " It was clear to any physicist that the proton beam from the cyclotron, leaving the vacuum into the atmosphere, will immediately be scattered due to the collision with air molecules, so that there will not actually be any "shelling" of enemy aircraft with a proton beam. But the military did not understand physics, and the money was allocated. The Institute was saved, and the experiments, of course, did not lead to the creation of weapons due to the "low effectiveness of the impact." So Akimov, most likely, simply repeated this social experiment of his German colleague.

Nikola Tesla did not have the funds for research at the beginning of the twentieth century, but luckily he found a response from the wealthy American Westinghouse, who financed him. In the USSR, except for the state, no one could finance new developments. Therefore, it was possible to apply only to the state. And the state, as usual, allocated this money; at the same time, the military department was the most generous of all. However, of course, he too had to be convinced.

As far as I understand, 500 million rubles is a lot if one person appropriates them. But if a whole research institute is working, and the bulk of the funds is spent on purchasing the necessary equipment, then this is very little. When I worked at the RATI of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, we were allocated 30 thousand rubles for an experiment in one laboratory for six months without the slightest delay. This means that about 180 thousand rubles a year could be allocated for all laboratories of our department, and 1.8 million rubles for 10 years. So the research institute, consisting of 10 departments, would have quietly spent 20 million rubles just for equipment in 10 years. At the same time, I can say that we saved as much as possible, and we could not buy a number of devices because of their high cost. If we were allowed to buy everything that we really needed, the costs would increase by an order of magnitude. But to these 200 million rubles it would be necessary to add wages, business trips, rent of premises, utility bills, etc., so we will come out approximately at this amount. I believe that the maintenance of any other small academic research institute of physical direction did not cost the state any cheaper. And if we recall that, for example, research on controlled thermonuclear fusion has been conducted since the end of the 30s of the twentieth century (that is, for 70 years), and this synthesis has not been used in industrial use, then, I believe, immeasurably large amounts were paid here. funds than Akimov. But for some reason, no one is in a hurry to accuse the creators of tokamaks of a scam and the vicious practice of financing pseudoscientific research.

Unfortunately, fundamental science is such that it requires large capital investments, but does not at all guarantee a profitable applied result. And in this respect, Anatoly Evgenievich did not go beyond the framework of science at all. It was just that he and his institute were treated differently than any other physics research institute.

From the standpoint of his employees, a lot of what was necessary and important to implement, at least to show colleagues the reality of the existence of torsion fields, did not work out precisely because there were not enough funds.

If academician E.P. Kruglyakov recognizes the existence of the Chernetsky generator, then, therefore, any application of such a generator is a physical effect that must be studied. And here there is no charlatanism and cannot be. Another thing is that in some cases the planned effect is easy to obtain, in others it is much more difficult, and the third requires decades of hard work to achieve it. And the point here is not in "pseudoscience", but in the objective difficulties of research. Let us imagine for a moment that we declared that the experiments of Luigi Galvani were quackery, who passed a current from an electrical element invented by him through the exposed muscles of the frog's leg. Then its element would not have been improved by Alessandro Volta, there would have been no brilliant work on the physics of electricity in the 19th century, and as a result, we would now be sitting not only without incandescent lamps or electric motors, but also without computers.

It is possible that progress even in the field of everyday life would have been much stronger if Akimov's research had found more substantial material support. " Today it promises torsion lines for transmitting information. True, torsion waves (not like radio waves!) Will propagate a million times faster than the speed of light! It is interesting how the last statement gets along with references to Albert Einstein, who calls the speed of light as the limiting one? " (KRU, p. 55). It is strange that the physicist Kruglyakov is not aware of the fact that Einstein simply postulates a limit to the propagation velocity of a signal, but For each type of vibration and for each medium, this speed is different. So, the speed of sound in air is about 300 m / s, in metals it is several times higher. The speed of light in a vacuum is about 300,000 km / sec, in dense media it is several times less. But this applies to electromagnetic waves. Einstein did not write anything about torsion fields. Chernetsky generators were not known to him.

Let me also remind you that in the 50s of the twentieth century, a reference to A. Einstein would have for E.P. Kruglyakov has very unpleasant consequences. Then Einstein was considered an idealist in the USSR, and therefore he had no right to be considered a physicist, and it was impossible to rely on his formulas. And this period of non-recognition of the famous physicist lasted for several decades. In the 1980s, Chernetsky was not recognized in the USSR. Now Kruglyakov no longer says anything about Chernetsky's "charlatanism", and quite conscientiously, without any irony, uses the phrase " Chernetsky wave generator "... Probably, when a number of objective difficulties in experiments with torsion fields are overcome, the same Kruglyakov will say that by Akimov's "charlatanism" he did not mean these experiments themselves, but only the use of Chernetsky's generators for military purposes. But even here, apparently, we are not talking about the principle, but about the power received so far and about the efficiency of the generators themselves, that is, not about a physical, but about a purely technical problem that has nothing to do with Akimov.

The case with A.E. Akimov is indicative for me in another respect: being a half-recognized researcher (the military recognized him, physicists - no), becoming an academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, having tested and proved the applicability of torsion field generators for a number of physical problems(even if not for everyone that was planned for him), he, nevertheless, did not become not only an academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, but provoked the creation of a commission of the Russian Academy of Sciences to combat pseudoscience. This is not a physical but a social effect. He shows that science (and not only in Russia) has long become clannish, and the scientific merits of even outstanding personalities are just occasion for joining this clan, but not at all the determining reason. That is, once, for example, in the 18th century, it was enough for Gerhard Miller to finish his postgraduate studies, and, being a German, to come to Russia, having no idea of ​​Russian history at all, how it was enough to become an academician of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences precisely in department of history. But D.I. For Mendeleev, all his scientific merits in the field of chemistry were not enough to become an academician of the same Academy in the department of chemistry. And whenever this world famous scientist was invited to chemical congresses abroad, some much less famous academician went instead of him, who represented Russian science there. Thank God that his "Periodic Table of Chemical Elements" was not declared a pseudoscience! It's just that Mendeleev managed to get international recognition before his academicians recognized him, so this kind of embarrassment could hardly have happened.

There is only one conclusion from this instructive, but sad story - the recognition should take place within the native walls and precisely according to the declared science. And the hasty fame acquired somewhere on the side - from the scientific community, from esotericists, from foreign colleagues, from the Ministry of Defense, in a parallel branch of the Academy of Sciences (for example, in the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences instead of the Russian Academy of Sciences) not only does not contribute to the growth of the scientific authority of the researcher, but probably , only adds fuel to the fire of his ill-wishers. So in addition to, so to speak, the physical "resistance of the material", the discoverer has to contend with stronger social resistance. It is a pity, but, as it seems, this is the fate of any sciences and in any country.

Therefore, we have to sincerely regret that Anatoly Evgenievich did not manage to live up to even a respectful attitude towards his scientific activity as the author of one of the alternative concepts in the field of microworld physics. Nevertheless, the bright memory of this pioneer will remain forever in our hearts. This is one of the geniuses of the Russian land that Russian science can be proud of. We, his colleagues, pay tribute to him for his pioneering experiments with torsion fields, and for his theoretical generalizations, and for the introduction into the minds of people of the fact that not only elementary particles, but even the fields themselves, cannot do without rotation.

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL & APPLIED PHYSICS

Moscow 1995

L.E. Akimov, G.I.Shipov. Torsion fields and their experimental applications.

PreprintNo.4 . International Institute for Theoretical and Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Moscow, 1995, 31 p. 10 ill., Bibl. 53 pp.

The methods of introducing torsion fields as objects of theoretical physics are indicated. The main properties of torsion fields are given. Examples of the manifestation of torsion fields in fundamental experiments are considered. The main applied and technological applications of torsion fields are stated.

Received 10/02/95.

© A.E. Akimov, G.I. Shipov, 1995

© MITPF RANS, 1995

Introduction

Torsion energy sources

Torsion propellers

Torsion technology for the production of materials

Torsion means of communication and information transfer

Torsion Geophysics

Torsion Astrophysics

conclusions

Literature

Introduction

The adequacy of understanding Nature is proportional to our knowledge of the laws operating in it. The history of the development of Natural Science for at least the last hundred years indicates that the appearance of experimental results that cannot be explained within the framework of generally accepted scientific concepts is a direct indication of the incompleteness of our knowledge about Nature.

Over the past decades, it has been constantly stated that all known natural phenomena and experimental results are exhaustively explained by the known four interactions: electromagnetism, gravity, strong and weak interactions. However, over the past fifty years, about twenty experimental results have accumulated that have not been explained within the framework of these interactions [I].

Without any connection with this dramatic situation for this stage in the development of natural science, since the thirties the search for new long-range actions continued. Suffice it to point to the works of G. Tetrode and A. F. Fokker [3], and later J. Wheeler and R. Feynman and other authors. However, these works have not received proper development. The only exceptions were the concepts of torsion fields.

The theory of torsion fields (torsion fields) is a traditional direction in theoretical physics, dating back to the works of the second half of the last century. However, in its modern form, the theory of torsion fields was formulated thanks to the ideas of Eli Cartan, who was the first to clearly and definitely indicated the existence in Nature of fields generated by the density of angular momentum. To date, the bibliography of world periodicals on torsion fields numbers up to 10 thousand articles belonging to about a hundred authors. More than half of these theorists work in Russia.

Despite the sufficiently developed theoretical apparatus, torsion fields until the beginning of the seventies of our century continued to be only a theoretical object. That is why they have not become the same universal factor as electrodynamics and gravity. Moreover, there was a theoretical conclusion that, since the constant of spin-torsion interactions is proportional to the product G x , (G - gravitational constant, - Planck's constant), i.e. it is almost 30 orders of magnitude weaker than gravitational interactions, then, even if torsion effects exist in Nature, they cannot give a noticeable contribution to the observed phenomena.

However, in the early 70s, as a result of the works of F. Hel, T. Kibble, D. Shima and others, it was shown that this conclusion is not valid in general for torsion fields, but only for static torsion fields generated by spinning sources without radiation.

In the next 20 years, a large number of works appeared on the theory of dynamic torsion (spinning source with radiation). In these works, it was shown that the Lagrangian of a spinning source with radiation includes up to ten terms with constants that do not depend in any way on either G or in relation to which the theory does not impose the requirement of their obligatory smallness. This fact is well known to specialists in the theory of torsion fields. Nevertheless, the old point of view about the smallness of the constants of spin-torsion interactions continued to psychologically interfere with the search for experimental manifestations of torsion effects in the next 15 years. Only in the early 80s in Russia was attention paid to the global role of the conclusions of the dynamic theory of torsion fields. It was then that attention was drawn to the existence of an extensive experimental phenomenology in physics, containing many experimental results that could not be explained from the standpoint of four known interactions, and which are an experimental manifestation of torsion effects. With the creation in the 80s for the first time in the world in Russia of generators of torsion fields, purposeful studies were developed and carried out in many directions to find the manifestation of torsion fields, which yielded a large amount of practical results.

Torsion fields can theoretically be introduced in many different ways. However, at a fundamental level, they are naturally introduced within the framework of the concept of Physical Vacuum. For this Einstein equation

i, j, k…=0,1,2,3

Yang-Mills equations

i, j, k…=0,1,2,3 A, B… = 0.1,… n

and the Heisenberg equations

n, k... =0,1,2,3

are written in spinor form and are completely geometrized:

Geometrized Heisenberg Equations

=0,1,

Geometrized Einstein Equations

Geometrized Yang-Mills equations

The specified system of equations is solved in the space of absolute parallelism, supplemented by rotational coordinates.

It is possible to construct solutions that satisfy this system of equations and describe electromagnetic, gravitational and torsion fields.

For a number of situations, it is useful to interpret the fields as polarizing in a certain sense, the state of the physical vacuum.

Let's make some preliminary remarks. We will consider the Physical Vacuum as a material medium isotropically filling all space (both free space and matter), having a quantum structure and unobservable (on average) in an undisturbed state. Such a Vacuum is described by the operator 0]. Different vacuum states arise when the symmetry and invariance of the Vacuum are broken. In particular cases, when considering various physical processes and phenomena, the observer usually creates models of the Physical Vacuum adequate to these processes and phenomena. The use of different models of the Physical Vacuum is typical for modern astrophysics, in which they are used as constructive models, for example, -vacuum, Urn vacuum, Boulevard vacuum, Hartl-Hawking vacuum, Rindler vacuum, etc.

In the modern interpretation, Physical Vacuum is a complex quantum dynamic object that manifests itself through fluctuations. The theoretical approach is based on the concepts of S. Weinberg, A. Salam and S. Gleshaw.

However, as it will be clear from further analysis, it was found expedient to return to the electron-positron model of Physical Vacuum by P. Dirac in a slightly modified interpretation of this model. The return to P. Dirac's models, despite the known shortcomings and contradictions of this model, can be considered justified, and the models themselves have not exhausted their constructive potential if they help to formulate conclusions that do not directly follow from modern models.

At the same time, taking into account that Vacuum is defined as a state without particles, and proceeding from the model of classical spin as an annular wave packet (following Belinfante's terminology - a circulating energy flux), we will consider Vacuum as a system of annular wave packets of electrons and positrons, and not proper electron-positron pairs.

Under the assumptions made, it is easy to see that the condition of the true electroneutrality of the electron-positron Vacuum will correspond to the state when the ring wave packets of electrons and positrons are embedded in each other. If, in this case, the spins of these nested ring packets are opposite, then such a system will be self-compensated not only in terms of charges, but also in terms of the classical spin and magnetic moment. Such a system of nested ring wave packets will be called a fiton (Fig. 1A).

Dense packing of fitons will be considered as a simplified model of Physical Vacuum (Figure 1B).

It is useful to note that in the experiments of A. Krisch the observed effects are equivalent to demonstrating the possibility of realizing, albeit dynamic, but embedded states in systems with opposite spins, as in the proposed fiton model. Let us also point out one more important circumstance that confirms, at least, the admissibility of the phyton model. In accordance with D. Bjorken's model, it is possible to construct electrodynamics without resorting to the concept of photons, based only on the interacting electron-positron field. (This model is not without a number of difficulties.) The concept of quanta as electron-positron pairs was used by M. Broido independently of D. Bjorken. At the same time, Ya.B. Zeldovich showed that in the presence of an electromagnetic field in Vacuum, electron-positron pairs are created, as a result of which a nonzero energy of Vacuum appears, which is considered as the energy of the field. The connection between electromagnetism and vacuum fluctuations was noted by L.A. Rivlin. Earlier, similar ideas, but for the gravitational field, were formulated by A.D. Sakharov.

Formally, with the spin compensation of fitons, their mutual orientation in the ensemble, in the Physical Vacuum, can seem to be arbitrary. However, it seems intuitively that Vacuum forms an ordered structure with linear packing, as shown in Figure 1B. The idea of ​​the ordering of the Vacuum, apparently, belongs to A.D. Kirzhnits and A.D. Linde. It would be naive to see in the constructed model the true structure of the Physical Vacuum, since it is impossible to demand more from the model than the artificial scheme is capable of.

Let us consider the most important in practical terms cases of perturbation of the Physical Vacuum by various external sources. This may help to assess the feasibility of the developed approach.

1. Let the source of perturbation be the charge - q. If the Vacuum has a phytonic structure, then the action of the charge will be expressed in the charge polarization of the Physical Vacuum, as it is conventionally shown in Fig. 1C. This case is well known in quantum electrodynamics. In particular, the Lamb shift is traditionally explained through the charge polarization of the electron-positron Physical Vacuum.

If we take into account the already mentioned model of D. Bjorken, ideas of Ya.B. Zeldovich, and also, then the state of charge polarization of the Physical Vacuum can be interpreted as an electromagnetic field (E-field).

2. Let the source of perturbation be the mass - T. Unlike the previous case, when we are faced with a well-known situation, a hypothetical assumption will be made here. Perturbation of Physical Vacuum by mass T will be expressed in symmetric vibrations of fitons elements along the axis to the center of the disturbed object, as it is conventionally shown in Fig. 1D. This state of Physical Vacuum can be characterized as spin longitudinal polarization, interpreted as a gravitational field (G-field). As already noted, A.D. Sakharov introduced the concept of the gravitational field as a state of Physical Vacuum, which corresponds to the stated model of gravity. The polarization states of gravity were discussed in.

Dynamic longitudinal polarization corresponds to the non-screening property of the gravitational field. VA Bunin, and later VA Dubrovsky, not considering the mechanism of gravity, but assuming that gravitational waves are longitudinal waves in an elastic Physical Vacuum, showed that the speed of such waves will be of the order of 10 9 s.

Usually, physics does not consider theories related to superluminal velocities. This is due to the fact that in this case, many thought experiments lead to a violation of cause-and-effect relationships. However, it is possible that at a higher level of knowledge the "superluminal catastrophe" will be overcome in the same way as the "ultraviolet catastrophe" was overcome in due time.

The proposed approach to interpreting the mechanism of gravity is not something exotic. In the theories of induced gravity, the gravitational field is considered as a consequence of the uncompensation of the Vacuum, which arises during its polarization.

In the works of Butorin, as well as Bershadsky and Mekhedkin, estimates of the vibration frequency characteristic of gravity were obtained. However, the scatter of these estimates is very large and ranges from 10 9 to 10 40 Hz. There is reason to believe that the frequency range 10 20 -10 40 Hz is more realistic.

If the mechanism of gravity is really connected with the longitudinal spin polarization of the Physical Vacuum, then in this case it will be necessary to admit that the nature of gravity is such that antigravity does not exist.

3. Let the source of the perturbation be the classical spin - d. Let us assume that the action of the classical spin on the Physical Vacuum will be as follows. If the source has a spin oriented as shown in Fig. 1F, then the spins of fitons, which coincide with the orientation of the spin of the source, retain their orientation. Those spins of fitons that are opposite to the spin of the source will experience an inversion under the influence of the source. As a result, the Physical Vacuum will pass into the state of transverse spin polarization. This polarization state can be interpreted as a spin field (S-field), that is, the field generated by the classical spin. The formulated approach is consonant with the concept of torsion fields as a condensate of fermion pairs.

The polarization spin states S R and S L contradict Pauli's exclusion. However, according to the concept of M.A. Markov, at densities of the order of Planck's, the fundamental physical laws may have a different form from the known ones. Rejection of Pauli's prohibition for such a specific material environment as Physical Vacuum is admissible, probably, no less than in the concept of quarks.

In accordance with the above approach, we can say that a single medium - Physical Vacuum can be in different phase (more precisely, polarization) states, EGS-states. This medium in a state of charge polarization manifests itself as an electromagnetic field (E). The same medium in the state of spin longitudinal polarization manifests itself as a gravitational field (G). Finally, the same medium (Physical Vacuum) in the state of spin transverse polarization manifests itself as a spin (torsion) field (S). That. EGS-polarization states of Physical Vacuum correspond to EGS-fields.

All three fields generated by independent kinematic parameters are universal, or fields of the first class in R. Uchiyama's terminology:

these fields manifest themselves at both the micro- and macroscopic levels. Here it is appropriate to recall the words of Ya.I. Pomeranchuk: "All physics is the physics of Vacuum." Developed representations allow us to approach the problem of, at least, universal fields from some general positions. In the proposed model, the role of a unified field is played by the Physical Vacuum, the polarization (phase) states of which are manifested as EGS-fields. Modern nature does not need "unions". In Nature there is only Vacuum and its polarization states. And "unions" "only reflect the degree of our understanding of the interconnection of fields.

The concept of the phase state of the Physical Vacuum and the polarization states of the Physical Vacuum in general form has been used in many works (see, for example,). It has been repeatedly noted in the past that a classical field can be regarded as a state of Vacuum. However, the polarization states of the Physical Vacuum were not given the fundamental role that they actually play. As a rule, it was not discussed what polarizations of the Vacuum are meant. In the described approach, the polarization of Vacuum according to Ya B Zel'dovich is interpreted as charge polarization (electromagnetic field). The polarization of Vacuum according to A.D. Sakharov is interpreted as spin longitudinal polarization (gravitational field). Polarization for torsion fields is interpreted as spin transverse polarization.

The stated views correspond to the concept of "information A-fields" R. Uchiyama, according to which each independent parameter of particles a i(let us clarify once again - the kinematic parameter, as rightly pointed out by L.A. Dadashev) corresponds to its material field A i, through which the interaction between the particles is carried out, corresponding to this parameter. Unlike the fields of the second class, associated with the symmetries of space, the fields of the first class (gauge fields), as R. Utiyama noted, have a connection with the particles - the sources of the field, some fundamental principle without any arbitrariness. The EGS concept gives the idea of ​​the polarization states of the Physical Vacuum as such a general principle.

Since it cannot be argued that other polarization states, besides the three considered above, are impossible, there are no fundamental reasons to deny a priori the possibility of other long-range actions. It is not excluded that the concept of A-fields and polarization states of the Physical Vacuum (phase states of the Physical Vacuum) will initiate a breakthrough into the area of ​​new long-range actions.

Torsion fields have properties that differ significantly from the known properties in electromagnetism and gravity.

The most important properties of torsion fields (radiation) are:

1. Unlike electromagnetism, where like charges are repelled, and unlike charges are attracted, in torsion fields like charges are attracted, and unlike charges are repelled.

2. Since torsion fields are generated by the classical spin, then as a result of the action of the torsion field on some object, this object will only change its spin state.

3. Passage through physical media without interacting with these media, i. E. no loss. It is useful to note that, without connection with torsion fields, Soviet physicists showed more than ten years ago that spin signals propagate in such a way that they cannot be screened.

4. The group velocity of torsion waves is not less than 10 9 s. A large review was published in the journal UFN with the analysis of astrophysical objects moving at speeds greater than the speed of light.

The absence of losses in the propagation of torsion waves makes it possible to communicate over long distances using low transmission power. It becomes possible to create underwater and underground communications. The high group velocity of torsion waves eliminates the problem of signal delay even within the Galaxy.

5. Since all known substances have a nonzero collective spin, all substances have their own torsion field. The spatial-frequency structure of the intrinsic torsion field of any substance is determined by the chemical composition and spatial structure of molecules or the crystal lattice of this substance.

6. Torsion fields have memory. A torsion source with a certain spatial-frequency structure of the torsion field polarizes the Physical Vacuum along the classical spin in a certain surrounding space. In this case, the emerging spatial spin structure is retained after the specified torsion source moves to another region of space.

The paradigm of torsion fields has made it possible to obtain fundamentally new results in almost all scientific and technical areas.