Who is Charles Darwin, there is no need to explain to anyone. Anyone who studied at school knows: all life on Earth came from one simple bacterium through evolution, that is, complication. However, there is no unequivocal evidence for this theory: even ardent fans of evolution cannot provide convincing arguments in its defense. But the theory of involution is gaining more and more popularity.

Darwin was the first who not only drew attention to the identity of the anatomical and morphological structure of various types of living beings, but also saw in this a direct relationship. For a long time, official science considered the theory of evolution to be the only correct one, denying all the others as unsubstantiated. And at the same time, she did not notice that Darwin did not present any convincing evidence either - in his conclusions he was based only on assumptions and assumptions, while the theory of involution looks much more logical and harmonious.

Actually, involution (from Latin involutio - "bending, curl, curling") is regression, loss, reduction. In practice - biological - it looks like this: as a maximum, individual organs and entire systems of the body are lost in the process of development, at least - their functions are greatly simplified or reduced.

According to the doctrine of involution, initially our planet was inhabited by one or several main types of "subsistence", from which - through centuries of degradation (!) - all other living beings originated in all their diversity.

Say: "It can't be!" But scientists from different countries and different fields of knowledge are saying with increasing confidence: "Maybe!" What are their arguments?

Well, firstly, both psychologists and physiologists are practically unanimous in the opinion that the processes of degradation, or regression, proceed faster, easier and (most importantly) more naturally. While progress requires significant efforts, moreover, directed in a strictly defined channel. This is most clearly illustrated by the "Mowgli phenomenon." Numerous cases are widely known when normally developing children, for one reason or another, found themselves among animals, grew up in their environment, adopted their habits and lifestyle. They learned to run on four limbs, eat raw meat, became insensitive to cold and heat, that is, they acquired some skills. But at the same time, they had a degradation of higher brain activity and, as a result, morphological degradation of the brain. Children became animals relatively quickly! But the reverse process was no longer possible. Almost all Mowgli, who were able to return to human society, did not learn to talk, wear clothes, walk on two legs, use cutlery, although a lot of effort was spent on this training. The same rare children, who nevertheless succumbed to the reverse “humanization”, lagged strongly and hopelessly in mental and emotional development and admitted that they were better in the pack.

There are even more common but less obvious examples. Take a look around - which of your friends-acquaintances continues to develop physically and mentally with age? Units. Most are degrading. And if the age-related mental degradation of humanity is not so striking, then the physical degradation is catastrophically obvious. Moreover, it also progresses from generation to generation. We are degenerating as a species!

One of the domestic adherents of the theory of involution, an employee of the Moscow Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Alexander Belov, asserts: “Man and animals develop and exercise only the organs they need for their environment. And those that they do not train rudiment, die off in subsequent generations. With the death of certain limbs, over time, the parts of the brain responsible for their functions disappear, and the genotype also changes. It is no longer possible to develop anew, to grow these parts of the brain and change the genotype back, therefore, all the diversity of the animal and plant world is the result of a gradual, but constantly occurring involution, which began with the degradation of the primary being. "

The second weighty argument in favor of the involutionary doctrine is the obvious discrepancy between some morphological and anatomical features of living things with their biological expediency. For example, the Soviet academician Ivan Shmalgauzen convincingly proved that all vertebrates, from humans to amphibians, even extinct cross-finned fish and ungulates have a five-toed structure of limbs. For a person, the waterfalls of Primorye are of great importance. But why a horse's five-fingered limb, if one finger would be enough for it? Or whales, for which, logically, a bone in the shape of an oar would be more suitable as a rowing limb? Does this look like the evolution of the grasping organ according to Darwin? Rather, it is the degradation of the hand into the paw, hoof or flippers.

An even more striking example is the human foot: a complex shock-absorbing device made up of 26 bones. The only biological justification for such a sophisticated "device" is the distribution of the load during upright posture, peculiar only to humans. In tetrapods, such a complex mechanism could not have appeared in the process of evolution - as unnecessary. However, in one or another atrophied state, it is present in most vertebrates, without carrying any biological meaning. But we should assume that this is one of the traces of degradation of higher beings, and everything will fall into place.

And there are dozens, if not hundreds of such inconsistencies!

Finally, there is the third serious argument in favor of the involutionary theory. An increasing number of anthropologists who study the so-called ancient people - Pithecanthropus, Neanderthals, Cro-Magnons, Sinanthropus, Australopithecus, etc., come to the conclusion that these species are not links in the same evolutionary chain from monkey to man, as was previously thought. In the process of complex and painstaking work, comparing the morphological and anatomical features of a particular species with the time intervals and areas of their habitat, scientists conclude: these are separate species of humanoid creatures that have degraded from a common ancestor, like all other life forms on the planet. And that this ancestor, from which Homo sapiens also originated, lived on Earth many millions of years ago, was highly developed, harmonious, possessed skills, knowledge and technologies inaccessible to our civilization. Who these people were, how and when they got to the planet and where they disappeared, scientists do not yet know. But their research seems to be steered in the right direction.

Do you still think that you descended from a monkey? Oh well…

"One who perfectly knows and understands the nature of God can say that he is enlightened." So says Ramta (the conventional name of a developed entity), transmitting knowledge from the subtle world to people through his guide (medium) - the American Jay Z Knight.

What we are on earth is the result of involution, the descent from the higher planes of the Creator to the lower ones for a specific purpose - the generation of energy (prana), the acquisition of the experience of creativity, knowledge. Evolution is the reverse process - returning home to the Creator. It is natural to assume at the same time that when we are freed from the energies of a low level, we acquire higher ones, more and more our consciousness acquires a consciousness close to the consciousness of the One who sent us down and sent us.

"Commitment to the emotional side of life leads to a loss of creativity, the only vital human need is to keep the physical body in good shape in order to get emotional and physical pleasure over and over again, the same experience."

Uselessly repeated experience, loss of the meaning of life, disorientation in the direction of human evolution contradict the intentions of the Creator, in this connection, He is forced to intervene in the carefree state of a beloved creature, forcing, in extreme cases, to be keenly interested in the cause of his suffering in the form of a cry: "Lord, for what!?".

All inhabitants of the Earth begin to acquire the experience of creation, starting from the very first steps. The first step is the beginning of the knowledge of the three-dimensional world at the lowest level, representing the bottom of society. Accordingly, life at the bottom is called low. We do not have an encyclopedic dictionary to give unambiguous definitions of things and events, so we will try to define the base state and base actions of a person using examples from life, based on the concepts of "what is good and what is bad", and the reader will choose for himself, agree with this or not.

In accordance with the data of ethology, the physical body of a person is stuffed with numerous survival programs inherent in animals, usually called instincts. Programs belonging to all species of the animal world without exception, from birds and insects to large marine and land mammals, regardless of the number and type of limbs carrying the body. For the mutual preservation of some species from extermination of each other, a group of programs has been introduced into the life of animals, called the usual word - morality. It is known that a strong animal has a strong morale, and a weak one has a weak one. Man is the weakest animal being, therefore he has the weakest morale.

It is these aforementioned properties that have determined human life at the first level of evolution. As we remember, in the percentage of lovers of this lifestyle, for example in Russia, 47% of the total population of the country.

The soul of the first level is the person who, for the first time or many times, having not learned anything in previous incarnations, again goes through elementary school on Earth in order to study the duality of the world, to find out what is good and what is bad, to accumulate in the causal body the maximum possible information about how the programs of the predominantly physical and lower emotional body work in response to external influences.

As a rule, such a soul is still poorly versed in the laws of society (not only state ones), has no idea about morality, the laws of the Creator are hidden for it with seven seals, its actions and thoughts are much closer to the primates of the animal community than to the Higher Self. ... It is very simple to distinguish a person of the first level from the second, especially the subsequent ones - usually he is guided by the formula: "it is impossible, but if you really want to, then you can ...". Such behavior is easily recognized - these are those who violate the laws of the state, morality, honor, etc. These are those who drunk driving a car, who steal, rob, kill, rape, take bribes, engage in prostitution and many other obscene things.

Somehow it becomes uncomfortable from the figure of 47% of those in Russia, almost every second has a tendency to live a purely animal life. At the same time, many of them wear a tie and pants, have cars and luxurious mansions, beautiful women and a lot of money (this is about men, about women in a slightly different way - a lot of money and so that he does not have a tail). The presence or absence of the latter does not depend on the level of spiritual development, but the wealth of undeveloped individuals is often created in a criminal way, in which there is no morality and creativity.

The education of the soul of the first level (and the subsequent ones too) occurs by the method of depriving anything, whatever it wants. Deprivation of health, material well-being, happiness, family, office and, ultimately, short-term life for systematic violation of the Creator's laws in the field of evolution, for forgetfulness of one's divine essence and violation of the program set from above before the next departure to the physical world.

It is for undeveloped souls that Buddha came specially once and taught the science of how to live with the least suffering. The soul of the first level is so deluded, living a 99% deeply miserable life, especially in freedom, that such a life by more developed entities is considered hell. There is no hell in heaven, it is only on Earth.

People of the first level, as well as the second, as a rule, are not guided in the field of spiritual development, therefore, they either deny in principle the presence of the Creator, the subtle world in the structure of visible material reality, or easily respond to calls to believe in God in a certain way. All the religions of the world are supported by them, they are intended for them, because it is impossible to bring them knowledge about the presence of the Single principle of everything in another way due to the lack of knowledge, experience, corresponding intellect.

In their everyday reality, undeveloped and slightly developed souls, as a rule, are not inclined to creation, creativity, rather to destruction, and are also subordinated to the passion to satisfy unbridled desires. Learning about the world from childhood begins with actions that often bring pain, dissatisfaction, sobbing, anger, resentment and other suffering. A child whose toy lives for only a few minutes begins to learn about the world from destruction. Having matured - from taking away toys from others, in fights, from the manifestation of selfishness, grasping reflex, everything that is abundantly enough in more primitive primates. Almost all his life he can live in a world of violence, manifesting it himself or being exposed to others. And so all, in most cases a short life, until it moves to a higher level. But for the sake of truth, I must say that in achieving primitive satisfaction, they are very inventive, even talented.

A low level of development is characterized by the desire to occupy the top of the hierarchical pyramid at any cost with the aim of appropriating benefits, first of all. It is sad when the base qualities of a person, for example, greed, are taken as the basis for the development of "progress" in the country and are elevated to the rank of a state idea. All this contradicts the laws of the evolutionary development of society, which will surely respond once again, for educational purposes.

In full accordance with the rule "like attracts like", the resonance of the coarse energies of people of the first level leads them to unification, large unions successfully implement the biological law, according to which a primitive hierarchical pyramid is built based on brute physical force, egoism. These same groups impose laws and morals on society that contribute to the consolidation of coarse energies in the life of society. Hence the killing and eating of animals, wars, borders, diseases, etc. etc. Calls for high morals and high energies will remain a voice in the wilderness until the situation forces them to take them more seriously in everyday life.

What can be a stimulus for a sharp evolutionary leap of a significant part of humanity, which can make you not only think about the meaning of life, but also take concrete, conscious steps towards spiritual growth? Only the loss of the most precious thing - health, life, abilities, material wealth, relatives and friends. For a small jump - a small loss, for a large one - a big one.

The essence of a person of the first level of spiritual (non-spiritual) development is described in more detail in the book "The National Idea of ​​Russia: Living Tomorrow is Better Than Yesterday." The qualities of a person of a high level of evolutionary development, fifth on the generally accepted scale, are sufficiently characterized in the second part of the author's book "A Short Way Home" (tuelo.ru). In the intermediate stages, a person can carry everything possible, from a monkey to a saint, he always has the right to choose. But on this segment of the path, the role of emotional bodies prevails, gross, primitive emotions accompany his reality at the second, higher - not the fourth, a mishmash of the two indicated types - at the third levels of evolution.

But more and more, as the person grows spiritually, his divine essence is manifested in the life of the individual (it is always in him, but it is not always manifested in the same way), the concepts of "good" and "bad" acquire refinement, with some time the line between them begins and, finally, the personality rises to the height of deep understanding of the Creator's laws, when good or bad no longer exists for him. Everything becomes correct for a certain level of development. And how to live, according to what rules - there is freedom of choice for this, which a person uses to the fullest. Then, when dualism disappears from consciousness, we can already say that a person becomes enlightened. As well as control over emotions, control over emotions open the door to a higher level.

Further growth leads to the state of an Arhat, in which selfish goals are meaningless for the individual. Even further - to the state of Bodhisattva - all-embracing love and joy from love and, finally, a sage, Buddha - a conductor of the Creator's ideas on Earth. This is already the sixth level of human development, the level of high spirituality.

What can a person of the sixth level of development be like? These are, for example, Lobsang Rampa, Jesus Christ, Lao Tzu, Confucius, Sergius of Radonezh, Seraphim of Sarov, Grigory Alexandrovich Potemkin, Lev Tolstoy and many others, personalities. Do not rush to grin or be indignant at the mention of Potemkin's surname, Russia did not give out such pretzels in relation to the best sons of the Motherland.
(to be continued)

In ancient rocks hundreds of millions of years old, various objects of clearly artificial origin have been found more than once. Official science usually ignored such finds, but ufologists and researchers of anomalous phenomena explained them in different ways: some saw in them the traces of time travelers or evidence of the paleovisit of aliens from space, others - evidence of the existence in the distant past of the Earth of intelligent civilizations that perished by for one reason or another.
During the California gold rush, prospectors made in mines and pits many finds of human remains, spearheads and arrowheads, stone dishes and other household items, indicating that a fairly developed community of people lived in this place in distant times. There would be nothing sensational in these finds if it were not for the age of the rocks in which they were found - 38-55 million years ...
We still consider the famous Lucy one of our ancestors, although Mary Leakey discovered in 1978 in Tanzania fossilized footprints of 3.6-3.8 million years old, they are older than Lucy, and are indistinguishable from footprints in their anatomical features. modern people ... Discovered and fossilized human footprints next to the footprints of dinosaurs!

It turns out that people of modern appearance lived on earth millions, or even tens of millions of years ago. Lucy simply existed nearby, just as gorillas or orangutans live next to us in modern forests.
Most likely, the history of the development of intelligent life on Earth is not as straightforward and primitive as it seemed to us for a long time. Civilizations arose and died, leaving only rare traces of their existence in the bowels of the planet.
The explanation of many biological mysteries is provided by the paradoxical theory of Alexander Belov, the author of the book "Anthropological detective".

All life on Earth came from one, gradually degraded intelligent creature. It changed in size, adapted to the environment, at the same time its structure was simplified and the ability to think was reduced. All these changes have been preserved in the legends of many peoples. Their analysis allowed the biologist and writer A. Belov to put forward a coherent hypothesis explaining the origin of all the diversity of the animal world on our planet from the first very perfect creature. Scientists call such development from complex to simple involution. This theory, it is better to call it a hypothesis, is not only the opposite of Darwin's evolutionary theory - from simple to complex, it also solves the main question of biology and paleontology in a different way: who descended from whom - man from ape or ape from man?
In the book of A. Belov, a slender, but unexpected hypothesis of the development of the animal world on the planet Earth is given.
According to A. Belov, the most graphic confirmation of the correctness of his hypothesis is the analysis of transformations of mammalian bones.
For example, the structure of the hand. If all changes in the animal kingdom occur as a result of evolutionary selection, then why do all animals have five fingers. This is understandable for monkeys. They pluck the fruits with their fingers. Why five fingers to wolves or frogs. On each finger, the latter has the same number of phalanges as a person. Is this thin graceful structure of the hand used to catch mosquitoes, because the frog has a more perfect tool - a "shooting" tongue. Both elephants and mammoths also have exactly the same limbs, and such “distant” animals in their appearance and way of life, like whales and bats, too. This circumstance could be logically explained by only one thing - the structure of the limbs of these animals is a rudiment inherited from their distant human-like ancestors.
An even more striking example of involution is the similarity between newly born baby monkeys and small children. The embryologist L. Bolk was the first to draw attention to this fact, which cannot be explained by the evolutionary theory. In his scientific works, he wrote that the baby monkey surprisingly resembles a person. He has pink, hairless skin, hands of normal length from the point of view of people. A newborn monkey has a humanly large brain. On her "face" there are no superciliary arches characteristic even of great apes, massive jaws. She also lacks the parietal crest. In general, she looks just like a man, only small. But several days pass, and this little man quickly turns into a monkey. Her human traits are degrading, and neither upbringing, nor special occupational therapy, nor training are able to reverse this process.

The development of the animal world and one of its parts - man - is moving towards a gradual simplification of the structure of individual organs by adapting them to specific conditions of existence.
For example, the aborigines of Australia. When Europeans discovered this continent, they found that the local people lead a very primitive lifestyle. Instead of houses, they have huts, they get food mainly by gathering, their language is poor. About a hundred years have passed and for anthropologists and ethnographers the unexpected discovery made by their colleagues - scientists-archaeologists - became a sensation. Remnants of villages and fortresses have been excavated in Australia. It turned out that once upon a time there was a developed civilization on this continent. But then the isolation of the continent, the absence of predators, an even climate became an obstacle to the development of Australian civilization, and its degradation began. The simplification of life gradually led to the process of aboriginal involution.
For example, the Mowgli phenomenon. Children raised by beasts and then
once again taken into society, in spite of any efforts, they no longer become
people. They simply go through accelerated individual involution.
"Mowgli" is already an animal with a human body. They think animal categories... We have such a person living in Kyrgyzstan. Him now35. He was taken away from the wolves when he was seven years old. He is being held in a psychiatrichospital, because I could not adapt. Juma is his name.He shows us our near future. "

The hypothesis put forward by Alexander Belov about the origin of mammals, including ape from a prehuman, was unexpectedly confirmed by the works of scientists of the continent, which he cited as an example of involution of humans. Australian biologists Simon Istilo and Genevieve Hebertne, independently of the Russian scientist, put forward their hypothesis about the origin of the ape from man. They confirmed it by unique studies of the genes of humans and great apes. They revised the "molecular clock" of humans and chimpanzees, whose genotypes match 99 percent, and determined the time when the two species split. It turned out that this happened about four million years ago. The older remains actually belong only to humans and their ancestors. Thus, the entire scenario of evolutionary development is called into question.

It turns out that not the monkeys descended from the trees and stood on two legs to get food, but on the contrary, the two-legged climbed the trees in search of a carefree life.

The hypothesis of involution, put forward by Alexander Belov, makes it possible to consider the ancient history of civilizations on planet Earth on a fundamentally new basis. According to the scientist, “there is a clear relationship: man - animal. Ancient eras give birth to their own animals. The same dinosaurs, reptiles - these are the involved descendants of much more "advanced" than they are, animals that lived about 250 million years ago. And all of them are generated by these ancient civilizations that left our planet. And mammals are later descendants of people, they have not yet lost warm-bloodedness, homeostasis, constancy of the internal environment ”.

Not us from the monkey, but she from us ?!

So, the human body, according to Belov, was a kind of matrix from which involution "made" monkeys, horses, pigs and other living creatures. The scientist says: “... Communities of intelligent beings have appeared on our planet more than once and have also disappeared more than once. From each such civilization, degraded living beings were preserved, which turned into various animals as a result of the process of involution ”.
The researcher gives a number of arguments in favor of his hypothesis based on a comparison of the skeletons of animals and humans. For example, this is what he writes in his book about five fingers on the limbs of a number of representatives of the animal world: “Many living creatures, ranging from primitive frogs to humans, have five fingers on their limbs. Why do all these animals have such excess? To admit that they carried through millions of generations of their ancestors, in many ways useless for themselves, five fingers, equipped with the right number of joints and phalanges, is to admit a miracle. But Darwinists don't believe in miracles. Another assumption would be logical; the perfect five-fingered mechanism is the original attribute of a person, where the function of the hand corresponds to its anatomical structure. It was already inherited from man by animals! "

Do you remember horses with their hooves? Here's another quote for you: “... The ancestors of pigs, horses (the teeth of the great horses were adapted to feed on foliage, not grass) and other ungulates in ancient times lived on trees and had five-fingered hands. But they did not have them because they adapted to life in the trees, but because they inherited these hands from the man who was the founder of their family. "
Do you have any doubts about the origin of fish? Belov writes: “For some reason, the rudimentary limbs of the cross-finned fish contain elements similar to the radius and ulna of the forearm, as well as to the small and large bones of the lower leg. This is an inheritance from upright creatures! "
In almost all living creatures, land, waterfowl or flying, the author of the hypothesis finds "reminders" of their origin from humans, he says: "... In vertebrates, the anatomy as a whole is human, and the functions are inhuman."

Each race has its own Bigfoot

Inherited from Mr. Belov and the famous Bigfoot. The scientist believes that Bigfoot exists. “But its pedigree does not come from the Neanderthals, who died out 35,000 years ago (as Professor B. Porshnev believed), and not from the even more primitive Homo erektus, which left the scene 200-300 thousand years ago, and certainly not from the Australopithecines - hypothetical first ancestors of man, but from modern people or from their immediate ancestors. "
By and large, Bigfoot is a homeless person who went to the forest or mountains and finally went wild there. His clothes were replaced by wool, due to the need to eat raw meat, fish, the roots strengthened his jaw and developed strong jaw muscles, but his brains were clearly diminished.

In his book, the scientist gives a number of examples of contacts with the so-called Bigfoot people and comes to the conclusion: "Bigfoot is a by-product of civilization, a degradant who retained the anthropological features of the race to which he belongs. Almost all races of the human subraces have their own snowmen, living in the same territories as them, in hard-to-reach places. The exception is the three-meter hairy giants, which apparently have survived to our time. "
So those who are trying to find Bigfoot should be guided precisely by three-meter giants (they still represent some kind of scientific interest), and not chase after wild "bums" who have developed exceptional abilities to escape from the pursuit and hide in the forest wilderness for a long time ... By the way, the scientist does not exclude the fact, noted by a number of researchers, that our feral relatives were able to develop in themselves exceptional psychic abilities, which greatly help them in such a difficult and risky life.

Do not degrade, but develop!

First, there was a transformation of degrading people into monkeys.“Former people underwent a stronger involution,” writes Alexander Belov, “who abandoned civilization altogether and even earlier gave preference to wild existence. Their populations quickly degraded. They have lived and continue to live in a state of ferality for tens of millions of years. It was they who turned into great apes. "
In turn, the monkeys have degraded into a wide variety of animal species.“Of course, all these transformations take more than one hundred thousand years ... - emphasizes the scientist. - If the great apes still retain anthropomorphic features, then the animals below them on the imaginary ladder of living animals lose them, receiving in return adaptations to water, air, land, underground and other life. They "accumulate" these adaptations in the form of genetic rearrangements and pass them on to their descendants. "
I foresee the most "insidious" question of readers - what about insects, arthropods and crustaceans? In an interview, the scientist suggested that in the Precambrian period, non-human civilizations could well have existed on Earth, the degradation of which gave rise to these living creatures. Perhaps this is the weakest point in Belov's hypothesis; if with vertebrates everything fits into a fairly harmonious scheme, then with insects and other "unsuitable" living creatures one has to resort to rather bold and yet unprovable assumptions.

However, who knows, now many people write about the mind of ants, they are perfectly oriented, transmit information to each other, know how to count and even keep pets (aphids); maybe there was once a civilization of insects on Earth?
How to relate to the scientist's hypothesis? Against the background of the fact that Darwin's theory is losing ground every year, the hypothesis of Alexander Belov is only gaining new supporters in its short history. In addition, this hypothesis or even theory is inherently humanistic, it makes us treat our smaller brothers with even greater warmth and care, because these are all former “humans” and with some of them we may well have even family relations in the distant past ...
And finally, this hypothesis and a good warning to all living people. Think about the stories of various Mowgli: forgetting the language, losing moral feelings and becoming a half-animal is much easier than it seems to many of us. That is why do not degrade, but develop! Even if it is not always easy, but looking at yourself in the mirror, you will never see a monkey in it ...
Group "UNKNOWN RUS"

Everybody's got political newscrime chronicles and climatic changes, we somehow do not payattention to stunning scientific sensations. Last Wednesday, 21March, at the A.N.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionOf the Russian Academy of Sciences at a regular meeting of the Interdepartmental Groupon Population Research, chaired by Doctor of Biologicalsciences Ariadna Filippovna Nazarova for four hours were discussedjust a sensation.Involution human recognized fact.

Human certainly does not come from a monkey. ANDindeed, at human and monkeys on earth have not been found such ancestors who would confirm the evolutionary theory of Darwin. Let's return to the meeting itself at the internationally recognized Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Two voluminous reports were made there. The first report was made by the Doctor of Biological Sciences Alexander Belov.

With the second - Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Andrey Tyunyaev.

Alexander Belov's report was devoted to the discussion of newarchaeological finds. It followed from it that becominghuman, or formation human, did not follow the Darwinian path,that is - from a monkey to human, and in the reverse order, i.e. involution... Simply put,monkeys can result degradation human.

The second option is monkeys and human can be independent biological branches, not connected with each other. Such conclusions Belov himself made on the basis of the study of fossil samples of jaws, individual teeth, skulls, and other bones.

Andrey Tyunyaev's report was devoted to the problems of African theoryorigin human and prepared jointly with a Harvard professorUniversity Anatoly Klyosov. The report convincingly showed that on the basis of morecareful examination of old data and new arrays of databases pictureresettlement human on the territory of the earth's surface took a different form, inwhich African populations human are not genetically ancestorsthe rest of the people on earth, then what are they? Just a side branch gone 130thousand years ago from the territory of the present Russian Plain and EasternEurope.

It was the main population that was on the territory of the Russian Plain that preceded the modern Caucasian man... Andrey Tyunyaev proves that, from his position, the development human toolooks like involution, degrading the process by which, the further historicallyhuman turned out to be from the Russian Plain, the more degraded... And in terms of genetics, skeletal transformation and color changeskin are a natural result degrading processes. So the four-hour meeting was ultimately cemented by one common theme - the origins human... General opinion is a matter of initial appearance human on the groundremains dark enough. And in this regard, even suchexotic version like appearance human on earth from space. This latest version is supported by at least two facts.

First. In fact, modern human no ancient biological predecessors have been discovered.

Second. Even the most ancient finds indicate upright posturehuman, that his toes were not set aside, likemonkeys. And most importantly, in the genome human no geneticmarkers older than 260 thousand years. But in favor involutionary, or degrading, theoryindicates not only a change in appearance, but also the structurebones.

Degradation is well visible on the example of the Australian aborigines. According to anthropology and genetics, modern human came toAustralia about forty thousand years ago. Finds dated toage, are much more progressive in their structure than indicatorsthe current aborigines of this continent. If ancient skulls are only half a centimeter thick, thenmodern aborigines in Australia, the skull bone reaches one and a halfcentimeters and at the same time differs in a much more primitive structure,which naturally indicates degradation formation systemsskulls. ...