Today we create a new heading of our informational and analytical community: "Person of Russian self-knowledge." We have already used this name in the material about the doctor of philosophical sciences - "Valentin Tolstoy as a person's Russian self-knowledge." Today, they make this name by an independent heading. In this category, people whose intellectual and social biography will be presented, on our visible analytical look from the height of the Russian idea, is located on the very edge of the process of self-knowledge of Russia. Today we tell in it about Major General Alexander Vladimirov.

We present its detailed biographical information, references to the main analytical and theoretical work, excerpt from the intellectual autobiography. We publish several fundamental work, including: "To the issue of national ideology," Russia without an army "and excerpts from the book" National Idea ". It remains to answer the question: why exactly Alexander Vladimirov we chose as the first candidate for the heading. The answer is simple: through the decision of the professional problems of the army, Vladimirov, as no one can be different in our country, realized that the path to solving private: professional and social problems lies in the field of national ideology. The depth, clarity and professionalization of the approach to its business: the military case and the problems of the army led Vladimirov to first to ideological, and then the national level of thinking: the specialist became an ideologist, and then with state person. The only thing we can point out as criticism of Vladimirov's position is the predominance of analysis over creativity. He extremely clearly marked his position: "There is no national idea, there is no national strategy, there is no country defense plan!" ("Russia loses this war because it does not have a national strategy - no, in no way ..."). Vladimirov Silen in the formulation of the problem and in summing up to its awareness (criticized modern ideology, as, for example, he brilliantly defeated the position of Vladislav Surkov in the article "On the issue of national ideology"), but not in solving it. It is from here that the definition of the main idea of \u200b\u200bRussia as a national, and not Russian, that is, Vladimirov does not go beyond professional thinking. This is an analyst, a professional, a specialist of the highest class, which in the country units, the soul is ill for a common cause and therefore emerging to the national level of ferris.

But the indication of the intellectual and personal biography of Major General is unique: this is really a real person of Russian self-knowledge.

Major General.
Born April 17, 1945 in the family of a soldier. Site, in many generations, officer. Russian.
Education:
Moscow Suvorov Military School ( 1963 .);
Moscow Higher Officer Command School ( 1966 .);
Military Academy. M.V. Frunze ( 1977 .);
Military Academy of General Staff Sun of the USSR ( 1984 .)
Specialty - Higher operational and strategic management.
Candidate of Political Sciences.
Passed service In the Far East, in HSVG, in Belarus, Vietnam.
During the service in the ranks of the Armed Forces of the USSR He passed all teams and staff posts from the commander of the motorized rifle platoon, to the head of the headquarters - the first deputy commander of the Communist Party Army, constantly carrying the service in combat deployed parts.
Awarded 20 state awards.
Worked: assistant Minister of Defense of the USSR on military reform issues; military adviser to the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation; Leader of the group of analysis of the problems of the Armed Forces and the MCC of the Analytic Department of the President of the Russian Federation; Advisor to the International Fund of Economic and Social Reforms (Fund "Reform"); General Director of the Publishing House "Military Parade"; Senior Researcher of the Institute of the United States and Canada RAS.
Currently - Vice President of the College of Military Experts of Russia, Chairman of the All-Russian Union of Cadet Associations "Open Commonwealth of Suvorovtsev, Nakhimovtsev and Cadet of Russia", Chairman of the Moscow Suvorovo-Nakhimovsky Commonwealth, Member of the National Strategy Council, Senior Researcher NE RAS ..
Participated in the development "Fundamentals of the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation", Laws of the Russian Federation "On Defense", "On Security", "On the status of servicemen", "On conversion", "About veterans", Messages of the President of the Russian Federation by the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on national security, the concept of national security of the Russian Federation, "Fundamentals of National Security and Development of Russia."
Author of more than 120 works and publications On the problems of the national state idea, military reform, reform of the armed forces, civil control over the power structures of the state, on the problems of international, regional and national security, the national strategy, on the problems of state-building and management, as well as five monographs: "On the national state idea Russia "," Military Reform in Russia "," Strategic Etudes "," Abstracts to the Strategy of Russia "," Conceptual Basics of the National Strategy of Russia. Political Spectacle. "
Married, has four children and three grandchildren

annotation

The monograph of General Alexander Vladimirov is the only one of its kind work, which directly announces that it is written not "about the war", or about the "art of war", but represents the "war theory" that in the history of military thought is a unique example.

Labor gives a fairly complete and system idea of \u200b\u200bthe war as a social phenomenon, as an important part of national being and state practice.

In the scale of the "Wars" scale, the works of Alexander Vladimirov can be compared with the "Unified Field Theory" in physics, as the war and the armed struggle are not only part of the being of humanity, which has its philosophy, but also a mandatory part of the National Power Strategy, understood by the author as the theory , practice and art of government management.

His theory of war fit and do not contradict each other an understanding of the war in the interpretation of Sun Tzu, the theory of war in Karl von Clausevitz, Lidel B. Garth and modern conclusions of military science. The war is described by the author, as may be, the main social phenomenon of human being, having its own general (social) and actually military (armed) parts, which, in turn, also have their philosophy, dialectics, laws, principles and methods of preparation and reference, And which do not contradict each other, but explain the phenomenon of war and detect its toolkit.

For the first time in the history of military thought, the author was able to make a relative order in the amount of ideas accumulated and give the theory of war scientific harvestness and foundation, despite the fact that General Alexander Vladimirov's own ideas are his independent contribution to the treasury of world military thought, and impulse capable of bringing her new level.

Of particular importance, new basic foundations developed by the author, which create prerequisites for a creative breakthrough in military science and the emergence of new effective state practices in the military construction of Russia, in the management of the state and the army.

The monograph is not only a textbook on the theory of war, but also a textbook on the national strategy and philosophy of Russia's policies, and even "instructions" on the practical application of strategic axioms and the country management methods. Almost modern theory of war Alexander Vladimirov is a modern theory of government management.

Thus, in the field of political sciences, a new direction of scientific thought appeared, created the basis of a new scientific school, which is of crucial practical importance, and Russia may be proud that it is her homeland.

It seems that the study of the course of war theory and the foundations of the national strategy should be a mandatory component of vocational training in the system of the public service of Russia and in the system of professional military education.

The monograph is recommended for study: as a compulsory course to prepare managers of higher state authorities; as an independent course of study in educational institutions of higher education; in magistraces (graduate school) of political (political) and higher management specialties; When preparing a political asset in party construction.

Vladimirov Alexander Ivanovich

General Major General, President of the College of Military Experts of Russia, Honorary Chairman of the All-Russian Union of Cadet Associations "Open Commonwealth of Suvorov, Nakhimovtsev and Cadets Russia", Member of the National Strategy Council, Senior Researcher, IE RAS.

Born on April 17, 1945 in the family of a soldier, graduated from the Moscow Suvorov Military School, the Moscow Higher Officer Command School (diploma with honors and the Gold Medal), the Military Academy. M.V. Frunze (diploma diploma), Military Academy of the General Staff of the USSR Sun (diploma with honors).

He served in the USSR Armed Forces on team and staff posts in the Far East, in the Soviet troops group in Germany, in Belarus, Vietnam. Awarded the 30th government, departmental and foreign awards.

Participated in the development of the "Fundamentals of the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation", the laws of the Russian Federation "On Defense", "On Security", "On the Status of Servicemen", "On Conversion", "On Veterans", Messages of the Russian Federation Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation for National Security, National Concepts Safety of the Russian Federation, "Fundamentals of the National Security and Development Strategy of Russia 2050". Author of more than 150 works and publications on the problems of national state ideas, military reform, civil control over the power structures of the state, international and national security, the national strategy. The author of six monographs: "On the national state idea of \u200b\u200bRussia", "Military reform in Russia", "strategic etudes", "Abstracts to the Strategy of Russia", "The conceptual foundations of the National Strategy of Russia. Political science aspect, "Basics of the General Theory of War".

Summary of the monograph "Basics of the General Theory of War"

Preamble. Civilization factor

1. World today: general assessment of the strategic environment

1.2 Main civilizational factors of contemporary existence of humanity

1.3 Geostrategic background of the development of Russia and the world in the nearest foreseeable future until 2050 and the main trends of its development

2. History of the issue and a brief abstract state of the problem

2.1 Periodization and general abis of the historical development of military affairs and war theory

2.2 Main schools in the field of war theory, their authors and main works

Conclusions on chapter

Preamble. On general approaches to the development of war theory

1. Essential foundations of the theory of drifts

1.1 War and its nature

1.2 General concepts of war and military science theory

1.3 The main postulates of war theory

2.2 Economy of War

3. Typology Wars

3.1 Types of War

3.2 Value Typology Wars ("Fair" war, "unfair")

3.3 Geopolitical technologies as new operational means of war

4. Principles, laws, law and psychology of war

4.1 On the principles of war

4.2 On the laws of war

4.3 On the right of war

4.4 On the psychology of war

Conclusions on chapter

Preamble. War, Strategy and Politics: New Hierarchy

1. Fundamentals of the general theory of the National Strategy

1.2 General Provisions and Main Categories of National Strategy Theory

2. Types, types and "Plans" Strategies

2.1 Types of strategies

2.2 Types of strategies

2.3 Positive and negative plans of the National Strategy. Dialectic "Scroll" and "Izmor"

3. War Office

3.1 Questory Theory and Basic Approaches

3.2 Strategic Guide and Strategic Management

3.3 Supreme Commander

3.4 Taking Strategic Decisions

3.5 Strategic planning

Conclusions on chapter

Preamble. The theory of war as the philosophical, theoretical and methodological and basis of the national strategy as the basis of the state's life buildings.

1. On the National Strategy of Russia

1.1 On the National Strategic Culture and National Strategy of Russia

1.2 National Strategy of Russia in the logic of ethnogenesis

2. Fundamentals of the National Strategy of Russia

2.1 Strategic nation matrix

2.2 People as a position

2.3 Ideal, as the desired nation image of the future Russia, as the purpose of the national strategy and the basis of the position of the people

2.4 Own higher internal and external definitions of nations as the basis for its strategic position

2.5 Strategic Line of Nation Behavior

2.6 Line of the maximum expansion

2.7 "Peaceful" and "Military" time

2.8 Information sector of the nation and its safety

2.9 about national space

2.10 Connectivity factor as the basis of a strategy for the formation of the national space of Russia

2.11 "National Interests" and "National Security"

2.12 Russia as a new empire: ABC imperial principles

2.13 Eurasian Union (Evrasi), as a project and as a basic geostrategy of Russia

2.14 Some issues of survival of the nation in global catastrophes: the project "Ark Adam"

3. Frames decide all

3.1 Fundamentals of State Personnel Policy

3.2 On the formation of national elites: Cadet education as the basis of the system of education of national elites

4. State, War and Armed Forces: Major Trends

4.1 State and War

4.2 State and Armed Forces

5. State and army: basic approaches, aspects and abstracts

5.1 Army: Encyclopedic Interpretations and Doctrinal Provisions

5.2 National Strategy of Russia in the military-political sphere: Some doctrinal installations in the author's interpretation

5.3 Some questions of the foundations of National Military Construction

6. Army: the genetics of the army, as its basic and professional (corporate) basis

6.1 The concept of "genetics" of the army and the priorities of its formation

6.2 Army as a system

6.3 Army Purpose Philosophy

6.4 Basic archetype of the Russian warrior

6.5 About the State Ideology of Military Service

6.6 about military professionalism

6.7 About corporate professional ethics of the army

7. Army and society

7.1 Army and Politics

7.2 Place and role of the army in society

7.3 Military civil relations

7.4 Control over the power sector of the state

8. On the new geopolitical ethics

8.1 about global order

8.2 On the systems of international and regional security, their development and participation of Russia in them

8.3 from human rights to his duties and rights of humanity

8.4 Transition to new geopolitical ethics in the relationship between powers and nations

Conclusions on chapter

Conclusion

Strategic Axoma

At the request of the editorial office, Vladimirov, A. I., "Fundamentals of the General Theory of War" read specialists in the field of geopolitics and military affairs. Next, we give the opinion of the candidate of military sciences, Professor Kryazheva P. N.

The structure offered by the author, the structure and filling of its work, which it classifies as a monograph, is based on the results of its many years of creative research of many relevant and interrelated directions, sections and problems.

Even a simple acquaintance with the proposed structure of the monograph speaks many. So, we can conclude that the author approaches the development of its work not with a highly specialized, departmental orientation, but on the basis of deep and comprehensive analysis of many related and mutually informing areas and areas of activity and society as a whole and individual groups, components.

The author has a huge number of analytical developments, generalizations on various problems of the widest range of problems from ensuring the vital activity of a particular person, to questions covering many areas of society, geopolitical issues, analytical assessment of the place and role of the state in the world community, places, roles and significance of the consequences The activities of the ruling elite of the state and much, much more. A simple listing of only some of them: "On the national state idea of \u200b\u200bRussia", "Military reform in Russia", "Strategic etudes", "Abstracts to the Strategy of Russia", "The conceptual foundations of the National Strategy of Russia. Political science aspect "- indicates the importance of these works in planning, organization and implementation of state-building, ensuring the national security of Russia in modern conditions, about the versatility of the author's interests and his civil position.

And the collection of data developments in the form of one targeted labor seems very significant and timely.

Probably, many agree with me that the lack of modern theory of war constrains the development of Russia and makes its external and internal policies are not flexible, and state activity is ineffective and non-competitive.

One of the main tasks of this work is an attempt to give the harmony and scientific validity of the outstanding achievements of military thought, scattered today on the centuries and works of great commander, strategists, politicians and scientists, and the creation of a relatively complete, modern theory of war on this basis.

The urgent relevance of research work of a similar focus is due to the following factors:

• the absence in the state as a whole and in his military department of the slender theory of the war (the theory of war is absent in the list of military theories as such and is not taught as a subject of learning even in the system of professional military education);
• manifestation of new trends in the development of humanity and substantial new factors of its modern being;
• current military events of modernity, requiring new understanding;
• the need to establish on the basis of the theory of the war of the independent theory of the national strategy and the theory of government management;
• the need to summarize the practical and scientific experience of humanity in the field of preparation and conduct of wars, identifying new trends in the political life and the development of military affairs, and their presentation in the interpretations of the concepts of the new theory of war;
• a certain stagnation of the domestic military thought of the last decades.

This means that there is an objective law of development - ignorance of both the laws of the evolution of nature, society and laws of war and strategy, as well as their arbitrary interpretation and the application always leads a nation towards collapse and do not exempt national elites, government and society from their responsibility for historical The fate of own nations and peoples.

Unfortunately, in modern history, the national strategy, as a rule, form not those representatives of the national elites, which "rose to the heights of knowledge, understanding and responsibility," and those who driven by the "instinct of power" are counting on the fact that in "their time "They do not face the collapse and they will be able to survive in it that there is only an example of another misconception, which only aggravates strategic mistakes and worsens the chances of their nations for survival and a worthy story. This position is really true to the state of affairs in modern Russia.

At the same time, even the surface analysis of the existence of mankind regarding the main issues of the survival of our earthly civilization, namely, issues of war and the world, puts modern political scientist and military thought to a dead end, since these problems do not find their systemic explanation today, and, the more Have a visible intelligible solution.

These problems are increasingly blurred by the manifestation of new trends in human development, while there are practically no positive and clear development trends, or they are not identified as such.

Today, the political and military thought is actively and with anxiously rushing in search of explained (or at least acceptable) forecasts and paintings of the future and trying to overlook the fabric times, but all these searches are unsystematic and not reduced to at least somehow understandable model.

The author explains this fact not so much the complexity of the problem raised, as the lack of systemic basis of searches. And as an alternative, the results of their many years of research are invited to such work as a monograph on creating the foundations of the general theory of war.

Modern researchers today are rapidly discussing the works of military historians and theorists and, including the creative heritage of Karl von Clausevitz, then agreeing with his interpretations of war, then the protesting against them (Israeli historian Martin Wang Kreveld) is active and argued in this process. This is what none of them offers anything fundamentally new.

At the same time, all modern experts converge on the fact that the Wars of the XX-XXI centuries have another nature than the war in the times of Clausevitz.

Conduring the analysis of the military-theoretical works of Clausevitz and the works of its modern opponents, the author brings us to the conclusion that the nature of the war is violence, and this is its absolute constant, which always remains unchanged, but at the same time the war content itself has radically changed Objectives, criteria, maintenance technologies and operating agents.

In our opinion, studies conducted by the author of such areas and sections of the theory of war, as the content of the war as a whole and in relation to the modern era, its goals, criteria, maintenance technologies and operating agents.

The author's undoubted merit is that on the basis of the research conducted, they are offered a new interpretation of a number of categories concerning the issues under consideration. We consider the most significant of them research in areas such as:

• categories related to the assessment of the state of national being - "challenges", "risks", "dangers", "threats", "crisis", "catastrophe", "collapse";
• identifying the main categories of war as a social phenomenon and part of the Being Socyum, such as the "war theory", "war", "world", "victory in the war"; "Niche of war";
• the concepts that determine the nature and specificity of the phenomenon of war as the process of organized violence - "aggression", "Theaters of War", "Position", "Connectivity", "Maneurur", "The Pattern" and others.

A very interesting and relevant is the author's typology of wars with a detailed analysis of the types of wars, where the focus was on the analysis of the wars of the XXI century, including such as asymmetric wars, information and sectocentric drifts, a roe well (network).

A significant contribution to science is the results of the author's research by new technologies warped in peacetime (information technologies) applied to Russia the main geopolitical players of the XXI century, its civilization opponents opponents. Alexander Ivanovich is one of the first researchers who saw the close relationship of modern geopolitical technologies and military affairs.

New information technologies are, according to the author, new operational means of war, which give new opportunities to manage the world. The war is conducted by new operating agents that have the type of modern geopolitical technologies that are informational.

The main technologies of the war of peacetime are: a strategy of "organized chaos"; Technology "Terror"; Technology "Freedom of Human Rights"; Technology "permanent reforms"; Technology "formation of national consciousness" and technology "Competition". The author paid considerable attention to the study of these technologies and methods of their application to Russia.

Obviously, under the influence of new technologies, the world will be uncontrollabically and quickly change in all hints of the life of society. And at the same time, today, perhaps, there are few who knows that, in the name of what, in exchange for what, and what price will change.

It should be accepted with the author that the panacea from the malicious influence of geopolitical technologies as new operating assets of the war is its own immune system of the state nation and civilization, the basis of which has always been, is and there will be their own system of shrines, ideals and values, the identity of their culture and lifestyle .

It seems an important understanding of the fact that the state power of our geopolitical rival and its national interests are always worth it for the democratic demagogy.

Interesting and original is the author's approach to the analysis of the principles, laws, rights and psychology of war. Unlike preceding research of domestic military theoretics, Vladimirov A.I. The path was not a narrow-specific, party-dogmatical, but the path of generalization and analysis of the world military heritage and works of modern military researchers (Suvorov A. V., Klado N. L., Sergey Pererestagin, Sun Tzu, Clausevitz, E. J. Kingston-Macclory, Liddela Garta, Martin Wang Kreveld and others).

This allowed the author on the basis of deep and comprehensive analysis and summarizing the world military heritage to express several original and at the same time relevant and fully implemented in military laws and the principles of war. I will give only some of them:

• the nation can only defeat when she knows and skillfully uses the laws of war, and pre-prepares himself to her;
• the nation can only be defeated when she has the will to victory;
• today, Russia is in such a position in which: when there is a chance to win - you have to fight if there is no chance - you need to win!

It is very significant in this venerable to the author of the fact that the theory of driers can take place and become recognized by science only when it will have its own set of basic signs of science, which requires such scientific attributes as its own principles and Laws, and when the war theory can be confirmed by the already historically existing military law.

Certain scientific and practical significance have a study by the author in such a field of state activity as providing national security. The national security of Russia, by definition by the author, is the state-generated system of internal and external conditions for the existence of its society (peoples) as a state of existence of a nation, guaranteed to implement its basic strategic goals, that is, its self-preservation, positive development and historical eternity, despite all Objectively existing and possible threats to the existence of Russia as states, super ethnos and special civilization.

The main object and the subject of the national security of Russia is she herself as the state (with its system of constitutional institutions), the Russian society itself (superethnos and special civilization), as well as the personality of each of its citizens with their own lifestyles and territory.

Recreation of the national military power of Russia, an adequate future challenge of its existence, perhaps as the author proves, only when military construction will be conducted in accordance with the new philosophy of military and state construction and taking into account the deep knowledge of the trends, the latest technologies and the warning strategy. The national security of Russia can be provided only if it is determined by the national interests and the harmonization of them with the interests of other powers and, above all, with the interests of state regional leaders.

In our opinion, these conclusions and suggestions of the author are very relevant due to the processes of transformation of our armed forces, the understanding of their role, forms and methods of action in the wars of the XXI century.

Not all conclusions and suggestions of the author are axiomatic and indisputable, much is at this stage only by copyright ideas subject to further deep and comprehensive research, initial positions for the deployment of scientific discussions on the pages of periodic press, special editions, collections, at seminars, conferences, etc. d.

Alexander Vladimirov
President of the College of Military Experts,
Member of the Council on National Strategy,
Head of the Cadet Movement of Russia,
Candidate of Political Sciences
Major General in resignation

Strategic atmosphere and reform Serdyukov: what to do

Dear Colleagues!
I consider the creation and work of the Izborkin club, an extremely important factor in modern Russian reality, as, in our opinion, despite the whole list of failures and scandals, the historical time of Russia is not yet exhausted and we can not only save themselves, but again come out in a row indeed The great and respected world of powers, and the founders of the new world order, as the world of mutually respected worlds.
To do this, you need to understand the entire severity of the experience of our development, and also know what and how to do.
I am going on the developer and author of the fundamental labor "Basics of the General Theory of War" and therefore I consider it important to present the declared topic in the paradigm, that is, in the basic scheme, this theory, since, according to our presentation, it is the theory of war can be the basis of theory, practitioners and art State management.
Some part of their ideas and ideas in clarifying these questions we will try to convey to you in this report.

I. Main trends in the development of the global military-strategic environment

1. The overall situation at the level of humanity and its civilizations

This situation is the essence of the main states and development trends of the world.
1. Basic forcibly implemented by globalization trends in the development of human civilization:
. the destruction of all existing religions;
. Destruction of a family as a basis of society;
. the destruction of the national state as the basis of the planetary society;
. The formation of a single ideology of consumption requiring the destruction of all the former meanings of being, except for the process of consumption and life for consumption.
That is why all the main and most important social institutions of humanity are in a specially organized crisis and impasse.
This deadlock is issued by the ideologists of world globalism for the exhaustion of their positive opportunities, their unnecessariness and even danger to the positive development of humanity.
2. West civilization, that is, Europe and the United States, and all international institutes created by them are located in a philosophical, historical, ideological and moral impasse, since the whole world and they themselves are increasingly aware of the final vanity of their basic foundations - universal sales, which intent Their being, and this is no one in the world does not cause any understanding, nor sympathy.
The global economic crisis who came to us from the United States, in fact there is a crisis of the existing model of management of the world through the "idea of \u200b\u200bprofit", which turned out to be an erroneous, vicious and inhuman idea.
They are no longer able to change it to another, as the basis of their philosophical and ethical constructions is the "triumph of vicious minorities" (from the point of view of genetics and medicine, gays and lesbians there are only individuals with congenital or acquired deviations from the human norm, and just "Freaks"), successfully aching their political revenge due to the nation and the vast majority of just normal people.
Today they are especially strong in Europe and, probably, therefore, it is so "tolerant", "politched", which is already becoming Muslim.
For example, an example of a complete and voluntary civilization degeneration can be considered the position of the Government of Belgium and Denmark, which, in order not to annoy the Muslim part of its population, officially banned the Christmas trees for Christmas and withdraw the Christian crosses from the national symbolism.
Almost all the main values, goals and directions of the development of civilization of the West turned in opposites.
Freedom and democracy - turned into unrestrained debauchery, permissiveness, irresponsibility and celebration of the morality of sexual minorities, which today ask the tone of the entire political and cultural life of Europe and the United States.
Human rights - became the most relevant and surpassed the rights of peoples to freedom, national sovereignty and even their place in history.
The criteria for the success of the person and life as wealth - led to the immorality of their means of receipt.
The separation of the church from the state, and "freedom of conscience" - led to a mutual reduction of their morality as the institutions of human society, which destroyed the historical traditional Christian way of life of the West, led to the dominant of entertainment and totalitarian sects and the moral decomposition of his society.
Multiculturalness and tolerance - led to the practical destruction of European Christian culture and unfriendly substitution with its values \u200b\u200band culture of Islam.
World law is formed by the needs of several global transnational players and the market, it is randomly changing depending on the needs of the moment and the agreements are strong.
The strategy and the rate on the power expansion into the world of "democratic values" of the West, as "universal universal universal values" turned out to be vicious and ineffective, which leads to moral bankruptcy not only the United States and their armed forces, but also the European Union and the North Atlantic Alliance.
At the same time, today the West is no longer uniform, his "golden billion" narrowed almost to the "golden million", that is, the differentiation of wealth, and the property of the population there reaches a new conflict limit.
In Europe, the awareness of the dismissal replacement of its indigenous ethnic groups is increasing, which are not gathering to enter her historically Christian civilization, and an understanding of the overall defense of the actions of their elites and states, but the national political elites, fearing for their own existence in power, just will be frankly, frankly betray their Peoples that cannot affect the growth of nationalism and even the possibility of religious wars.
Therefore, Europe and the United States are practically doomed by history, and therefore they have no other survival alternatives - only the unrestrained increase in their expansion in the outside, Europe - the expansion of the "vicious bases of statehood", the USA - the expansion of power.
All this has its end-limits that are almost achieved
2. China - still "focusing" and its global expansion is already going, however, it is still peacefully and quiet.
"But, by 2020, China should reach the peak of greatness and turn into a powerful, harmonious, modernized socialist state."
At the same time, the extension of aggregate power will reflect the two main indicators:
The first: "The creation of the powerful armed forces corresponding to the new international status of the Middle State." By this time, the re-equipment of NAK (seven aircraft carriers, fighter of the 5th generation, new rockets, military cosmos and funds of cybervarov should be completed, which will allow China to win any conflict in Southeast, Northeast and Central Asia. The "soft power" of the echelonized "scientific development" of the previous decade will acquire a steel rod "Weapons".
Second: the creation of a social state focused on internal consumption is greater than for external demand. Namely: compared with 2010, "the real disposable income of Middle Chinese by 2020 should increase by half a partial increase in GDP." That is, by 2020 China will become the world's largest economy, overtaking the United States. In this connection, the task is to "be indulgent to the United States" and avoid the situation when the United States will "lose face".
3. Islam - disassembled and not yet turned into a cohesive super ethnic, but quickly moves in this direction, and even faster absorbs Christianity the range in Europe and Russia, full-scale using the network structure of its faith and terrorism of political Islam.
4. Russia - still has not yet decided.
At the same time, only China and Russia have large in their ethnic basis (with all their quantitative incomparability) monolithic great ethnic groups - Han and Russians, which is a unique resource of development and stability.
Thus, all civilizations have already decided on their "special way in history", but only Russia is still "in throwing" regarding the answer to the question "where and with whom to go?".
***
It seems to us that any options for the movement of Russia to the West to Europe and identify themselves as its part, or its movement east to China, or flirting with the world of Islam (since "... we have 20 million Muslims and we are one of the biggest Muslim countries ") - all this movements in the wrong directions, each of which inevitably leads Russia only in the historical death.
With the option of "part of the West" - Russia will be its providing rear, the place of its sediments.
With the option "To China" - Russia will inevitably become its federal part.
With the "Islamization" option - it will not be at all.

2. Strategic features of the moment
The main strategic feature of the moment is, it is determined - as a state of permanent war.
According to the general theory of war, the war is the eternal form of the existence and state of society, which is always allowed by the victory of stronger and the beginning of the formation of losing conditions for their victory in the new war, which is the motive and prerequisite for development.
The fact that the war of civilizations is a war of meanings in which it wins the party that wins the space, resources or even temporarily comes to the management of the enemy's country, and the one that captures the future.
The war of meanings and nerves is a war actually, and the basis of geopolitical interactions, despite the fact that the war of the forces and means of armed struggle is only part of them.
Thus, today the war is not for space and not for the resources, today the war is conducted for the future of the nation.
War for the future is the war for:
. The right of nation itself exist in history;
. For its place and role in the world, obtained as a result of victory in the war;
. for the formation of the post-war painting of the world and the participation of the nation in the new human society management system;
. For the right to enjoy the strategic effects of its victory in the war, leading to the improvement of the conditions of national being and the growth of the nation.
Directly the war lead states representing or components of one or another civilization.
The main struggle is conducted at all levels and spheres, but most rigidly at the level and in the areas of national consciousness and basic national values.
It was the victory in these areas the shortest and cost-effective way leads the winner to the resources of the defeated, and to his national heritage, and to its spaces.
The capture of the future is constantly and is carried out by the methods of power unfriendly absorption of some civilizations by others, and specifically weak or weakening stronger and viable.
The seizure of the future, in the paradigms of the general theory of war, is carried out in the following forms.
US strategy:
. Operations for the change in the national consciousness and expansion of their value foundation and cultural began, with the simultaneous force of section of the control of Eurasia - Afghanistan, Europe - Kosovo, the Middle East - Iraq;
. Maintaining peace in the state of chaos of their own problems and disassembly, and "management of this chaos", since "order management" is much more expensive, more difficult, thinner;
. The formation of the army capable of quickly and thoroughly destroy the political, military and economic infrastructure of any country as the main tool of national force;
. Creating in Russia's spaces as the holder of the last world resources, the rented state necessary for the protection of resource spaces, and always ready to solve the problems of the West to the detriment of their national interests.
China Strategy:
. unhurried filling of someone else's national space with its physically presence, with general cultural and ideological tolerance;
. the formation of the country as a global factory that does not have another world alternative;
. The formation of a modern army capable of physically controlling huge, including marine, spaces.
Islam Strategy:
. Filling someone else's national space with its physical presence with the simultaneous displacement of indigenous ethnic groups and their cultures from their historical placement, including the methods of political Islam and terror;
. Reformatting the culture and lifestyle of indigenous ethnic groups in accordance with the traditions and customs of Islam.
***
At the same time, we believe that Russia has no national strategy, but she has:
Two direct external ideological, political and organized enemy:
The first is radical political liberalism;
The second is radical political Islam;
And also only one version of survival and development is to create your own geopolitical project - Evras - on the spaces of the former USSR.

Generally
1. The coming "era of change" will be not only era of planetary instability, but will inevitably become era of war as a direct armed struggle.
2. The United States specifically forms himself as the only combat and superior military force, as the main factor of victory in the war, and this is the main direction of its national strategy.
3. The world goes to a big war, as a global armed struggle, and Russia cannot avoid it.
4. That is why the issues of war and peace in the national strategy as a science, practice and art of government management is the main one today.

3. American meaning and war method

3.1 USA - Main Actor of World War
Analysis of events in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Egypt, Iran and Afghanistan, as well as the general trend of changes in the direction and intensity of the expansion of West-USA into the world, allows us to draw conclusions about the deep reasons for the modern war and its main actor, that is, the main thing The acting person of modern world politics.
In our understanding, the actor of modern geopolitics is its main (one of the main) participant and the subject interested in the implementation of its own strategic goals and projects that has its own and sufficient forces, funds, experience and will.
It seems that in order to really be, considered and recognized by the world of modern world-class geopolitics, it is necessary to have a certain necessary (and sufficient) set of immanently, that is, to determine inherent opportunities, properties and features that can be determined as factors defining strategic success in the war.
We are convinced that among other things, such as the availability of our own resources or a powerful national ideology, the factors of strategic success should be considered:
1. Superior National Military Power;
2. Superior military and scientific and technical idea, as well as the ability to implement its achievements;
3. awareness of the nation and its elite (ruling political regime, class) of its mission and purpose in the world;
4. The presence of a developed and adopted national strategy that is supporting and reflecting the meaning of national being;
5. The presence of political will;
6. The presence of own warning mechanisms and the ability to fight for their strategic goals.
Today, only one power has all these properties and opportunities - we are talking about the United States of America.

We can state that direct preparation for war, as an armed struggle in full swing.
In this regard, we see that today all these mandatory actions of the aggressor have already been manifested, the investigation of the war and in the process of its maintenance of the United States today produce the following strategic actions.
1. The formation of a new "ideological bipolarity" on the line "Democrats - Route", as the creation of the ideological foundation of world war.
This is a new "Kerzon Line", but which is not conducted by ethnic sign, but according to the "Democratic Democratic" principle, and "those who are not dreaming, the one against us, and they are all subject to punishment."
In the Islamic world, the parties of a big war marked:
This is the Sunni grouping of the south and the Shiite grouping of the North, on the side of which is already the West USA.
2. Strengthening its own combat power and ensuring the safety of the national territory of the country-compelling six hundredthmallia state military budgets, the creation of a system of national prone other continents and a global military presence system, etc.
3. Preparation of theaters of the war - the creation of the main bases of the Military-Political Control of the World: In Space; in the sea; In Europe - Kosovo; In Asia - Afghanistan.
Expansion of the military presence system with direct yield to the boundaries of states subject to aggression
4. Weakening of strategic opponents
. The rest of the world is the power expansion of their civilizational principles; involvement of the whole world in solving the tasks of its own survival and at its expense; The mechanisms of destruction of national states, through the application of new geopolitical information technologies to them, as new operating assets of the war and through the implementation of the "export of the revolution" by changing political regimes by non-violent means (worked out on the USSR, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, Georgia, Libya, Egypt, Syria; In turn - Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia ...); Formation of crises in the economy, financial sphere and the internal policy of states of the nasty side and so on.
. Europe - transfer its own economic crises and national crises to Europe and the world; encouraging the formation of bridgeheads of other civilizations; practical elimination of national armed forces; Inviroment of Europe into the questions of its own financial crisis and the crisis of European identity.
. China is a limitation of access to Africa, Asia and Russia resources; Creating bridgeheads of "democracy and radical Islam".
. Russia is to create the conditions of self-destruction of the country; Cheating public opinion "reboot"; "Buying for the root" of the national elite and targeted destruction of national science, culture, education and the capacity of the main institutions of the state, the country's depopulation; Practical elimination of the national defense system.
Today, Russia is already a distiller - the border territory of the war, both the United States and China.
5. Creating a system of complete control of space, air, maritime and information and interactive spaces and transition to readiness This control is technically and physically implemented.

3.2 American sense of war
According to the eighth postulate the foundations of the general theory of war, arguing that the modern war is a war of meaning, we consider it important to understand, "what and what is the meaning of", for example, for the main actor of the war, that is, for the United States.
For a better understanding of this issue, we will use the following logic that are obvious to us, statements.
1. The only power (country, nation), which unleashes and leads war, as an armed struggle, is only solely from the United States.
The United States holds in his military hostages, as its allies, for example, all Western Europe, having its military contingents and nuclear weapons in Germany, England, Base in Kosovo, as well as their military bases (objects) in almost most countries of the world, and lead active The fighting in Africa and Asia, unleasising the war there in those areas and against those states who own the resource, are trying to be independent, for example - in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Egypt, Iran and (probably) in Pakistan.
All other countries of the world, including all the great powers, China, Russia, England, Germany, France, and so on - only participate in US wars in the roles of allies, partners, opponents or victims.
2. Of course, the whole world knows that for the USA officially, the main thing is to "carry peace and democracy into the world", including by "coercion to the world", or "through the armed vaccination of democracy by dictatorial regimes and punish them for the victim of peaceful The population is "and so on, nevertheless, there is a USA and the other, as we understand, the main meaning of the war.
We are convinced that the only, in-depth and indigenous (genetic) meaning of the war, which the United States is leading with the whole world and its root cause is
- unlimited right and the possibility of a private organization - the Federal Reserve System of the United States of America printing their non-secured dollars, then in those quantities that would ensure the opportunity to buy the rest of the world on the root than and to exercise their eternal power and live for him his account. It is in this that we see the national meaning of the United States, her "desired image of the future", as well as its history.
3. It is this American national sense that the world rises into globalization, in a permanent war, puts in the world of poverty, injustice and disintegration, and today forms our history and history of the whole world.
4. The Center for the formation of new meanings of the West, as well as the development, financial, economic ideological, technological, information, organizational and actual security of the US survival (Golden Billion) - passed from national-state management systems, to the system of private transnational corporations, to, The genus, their "iron heel" capable of creating the most completely-raised form of social system - "Global oligarchic fascism".

3.3Whis, as an American method of exiting any crisis and debt write-off
The banner of neoliberalism under the blows of the crisis of the credit and financial system of the industrial society of the West strongly glanced.
And all the peoples and even the architects of the project of globalization of all countries about the global crisis have arisen fair and absolutely Russian questions: "Who is to blame"? And "what to do"?
At the same time, as it did not seem strange, but the founding fathers themselves, the founders of the liberal project recognized the chief culprit of the crisis - the neoliberalism itself, which loosen the foundations of industrial capital with bubbles of "fake money."
They "found" the most effective way of salvation namely:
Destroy the tenting building of neoliberalism (!) And on the wreckage of "Financial Pyramids" to build a new information society of knowledge economy;
But at the same time, to preserve the existing financial system based on the monopoly financial and organizational authority of the private corporation - the Federal Reserve System of the United States.
The proven method of demolition of the old socio-economic system, which entered the crisis, the wellness procedure for the rotational body of power, acts painful treatment of a bitter medication of war.
Today, the most dangerous and new strategic trend is the Anglo-American (Anglo-Saxon) approach to war, as a universal (and, from their point of view, the legal method of "zeroing national debts and commitments", the main method of forming a new strategic reality in the interests of the United States, and Also the main factor of national economic development.

The main strategic method of maintaining modern US war
First, permanent Warmanpiece of the Support on:
. State coup and "democratic" overthrow of non-profit regimes;
. on bribe, like a buying on the root of national elites and resources of states subject to "assimilation";
. on the ability to maintain global military instability and managing it;
. On the destruction of the actual military (armed) capabilities of states to the resistance of aggression.
Secondly, war at:
. the indisputable economic, information and actual military superiority, allowing any opponent's resistance to be considered insignificant;
. As well as in the implementation of full control over the political elites of all developed states (still except China).
***

II. Liberal military reform of Putin-Serdyukov and its results

1. Some results of military reform
Putin-Serdyukov's military reform was the nature of the forced demilitarization of the country in order to turn the military component of Russia into a military organization capable of becoming a regional component of NATO, but, by definition, unable to play at least some independent world role.
Ideologically, it proceeded from the Anglo-American system of the views of neoliberalism, according to which, the development of the military organization of Russia should be carried out in line with the natural course of things, that is, the method of quantitative and qualitative reduction of its capabilities, for reasons of new liberal values, national poverty and due to the lack of Strategic opponents.
The military doctrine of Russia, after the United States, recognizes only "three evil":
. International terrorism,
. Religious extremism
. National separatism,
. Today, cyber-terrorism is added to them and, sometimes, drug addicts
And all these "three evils" are represented only by gangs of militants, pirates, hackers and partisan underground.
Therefore, as the main strategic conclusion - Russia, a global military strategy on air-space, ocean and land theaters of war is not needed.
The mass army is not needed, able to undergo the protection of the economic interests of the country in the world.
For there are no serious enemies, and global safety on the routes of deliveries of raw materials and fuel (including Russian) provided the US military power and NATO.
The reform of the Armed Forces of Russia under the doctrine of neoliberalism brilliantly held the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation at the civilian Serdyukov A.E and his head of the General Staff N. Makarov.
Today, as unnecessary, during the reform, it was eliminated or "optimized" (reduced to a minimum) of the structure of the national strategy, the highest level of national military thought and military art, as the global assessments of the situation and the development of the National Strategy:
. The Security Council of the Russian Federation, which is specifically turned into an amorphous approval authority, and not strategic goaling;
. The main intelligence department of the GSH (GRSH):
. Academy of General Staff;
. General Staff himself lost all analytical structures, and his personnel composition is professionally and well horrible;
. National military vocational education ceased to exist as such.
In the "new appearance" of the armed forces disappeared the subjects of operational art and the strategy - divisions and the army, and therefore the comes, commander and commander disappeared, to take them now, because in Russia, no one is engaged in their preparation.
After all, with the transition to the brigade structure of the ground forces, the Battalion became the main combat unit, and the commander of the regular Russian army on the battlefield with broken gangs of terrorists became Rota-Water and Brigadier in the ranks of Major - Lieutenant Colonel.
As for the carriers of the Russian nuclear weapons: the rocket troops of the strategic appointment, far aviation and the rocket-bearing underwater fleet, then since the US President Raigan in the eyes of the liberals, they accounted for a great-hearted oskal "Evil Empire", and therefore the START contracts were constantly declining.
After all, or for the "restoration of the constitutional system", nor for conducting "counter-terrorism operations", nor for "coercion to the world" (Georgia) they are not needed.
At the same time, it is necessary to emphasize that the only strategic factor, which is still not a real full-scale world war, are the restraining nuclear capabilities of Russia.
But the "work of disarmament" of Russia continues to be successfully developed, so, for example, the international conference on nuclear disarmament, representatives of the public organization "Global Zero" recently held in Moscow, offered Russia to independently decide to reduce their strategic warheads to one thousand, and there It's not long to wait for our own extension and national about the United States will make it possible to neutralize this threat.
***
In general, due to strategic mistakes in goaling, uneducation, ignorance, inability, bias and political cowardice of our political establishment and general, we, as a result of the transition to a "new appearance", now we have an army:
. meaningless, since the Soviet military thought died, and there is no new Russian military thought, and the whole military, before the great, "strategy" went down to the level of battalion for taking or defensive village, since the brigade does not fight differently, and divisions and army no;
. Brainless, as there is no professional military education in Russia, the officers are not learn, since they are no one, there is nothing to learn about them, and the General Staff for the role of "the army brain" does not pull;
. blind and deaf, as military intelligence is destroyed as such, and our connection and all military information sphere lags behind our "probable friends" forever;
. Breaking up, since the junior command composition is not properly prepared and, as, the main component of the modern army is absent;
. Unceous, since there is no state ideology of military service, and corporate military ethics of an officer's composition, which could be the main internal manual in the service;
. powerless, since there is no modern weapon and sometimes just nothing to shoot;
. immobilized, since the means of committing a strategic maneuver is not even within the same theater of hostilities;
. aimless, since she herself does not understand why it is needed;
. uncontrolled, as it does not control either a state nor society, nor even its own command;
. And, in general, useless, as she is nothing, as a special combat state corporation, cannot.
***
The paradox of the situation is that, if according to the theory, military reform is carried out in order to obtain the military organization of the state of the new and corresponding time, combat quality, then the reform of Serdyukov has executed this task.
The new quality of the Russian Armed Forces is that there are already practically no of them, that is, there are no combat-ready armies, aviation and fleet, and there is something militarized and outsourcing, especially, but not strongly adapted to solve only regional, border and internal tasks.
In other words, today (with all the conversations "about everything is good, what the Serdyukov team made"):
The Army of Russia is not combined and not a war;
Russia cannot protect its territory and borders, its sky, space and the ocean;
And he does not know how to do it, and has nothing to do - this is the result of the activities of the "effective" minister E. Serdyukova.
Fortunately, this military reform ended, but not by the report of the Defense Minister E. Serdyukov on the work done and its achievements, but a grand corruption scandal.
Of course, V. Putin appointed Serdyukov not for theft, but for the reform, but as a result of its Russia became defenseless, and the total stealing in the Ministry of Defense is a national disgrace, which history of Russia did not know.
What to do now, when a war, as an armed struggle, is already burning at the Big Middle East, and Henry Kissinger has noticed the world, saying that: "Only the drums do not hear the drums."
The answer is one - quickly and efficiently restore its national military power, since only it is in the modern world the only factor ensuring the safe development and historical success of the nation.
Of course, we are catastrophically behind in the deployment of modern military construction and equipping the army, but it is better late than ever.
***
Does Russia have a chance to return the lost opportunities and status of the Great Military Power, without references to the remaining nuclear power?
The answer is unequivocal - there is such a chance.
The US signal to war and the examples of its maintenance, finally, were even perceived on themselves, and in Russia.
Returning in May 2012 to the presidential post of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, Vladimirovich Putin engaged in national oriented military construction.
Prose a promising plans of huge military spending.
Patriot Dmitry Olegovich Rogozin was appointed to the post of deputy premier for military-technical issues and execution of the arms program.
And in November 2012, the Minister of Defense in the rank of army was appointed volitional, experienced, intelligent and well-feeling in an atmosphere of emergency situations Sergey Keltovichychuhu.
It is quite obvious that the intended resuscitation of the military power of Russia will require a new concept of struggle no longer with scumbags, but with strategic opponents, or, let's call them - "probable friends."
The choice here is small:
. either the enemy of the United States and then Russia becomes the strategic rear of China;
. either the enemy of China and then Russia helping the United States, opens in Siberia the second front against China,
. And all this, given the fact that today Russia is strategic rear and the United States and China, and practically opens its national territory for their armed struggle for the resources on our spaces.
But Russia has a third way - to make great, and it seems to us preferable.

2. What to do
According to the theory of war, the army is an impersonation and concentrated expression of the force of the nation, the forces, as the ability of the state to achieve the desired result - the goals of the national strategy, including by coercion to change the behavior of certain society objects, participants in the political process, the subjects of world interactions.
The military power of the nation is intended for the nation to "stimulate" the type of behavior of its counterparties necessary for its interests, through the threat of strength or real power affects on them.
For this, the army should be the fact that it is obliged to be in its direct destination, that is, in peacetime - to learn to fight and not allow wishes to fight with Russia, and in wartime - to fight successfully and win in the war.
The tragedy of the state and the army became the fact that for the last decades of the Russian Army, every next Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation was worse and worse, why he needs this state and the army, and what should be done with them.
Even worse, these questions were understood by the members of all Russian governments, the fundamental role in which the liberalism apologists continue to play and continue to play, never proven their professional suitability and benefit from the country.
So you need to do, and how a road map of the return of military greatness of Russia can look like.
Not touching the issues of re-equipment of the army, aviation and fleet, social protection issues of their staffing and general issues of mobilization, we consider it important to draw the attention of the President and the Minister of Defense for the obligation of the following actions.
At the federal level:
. Create and accept the national strategy of Russia, and only then develop a military doctrine of power
. Re-form the Security Council of the Russian Federation as the structure of strategic goaling and control
. Create a Center for Independent Expertise
. Restore the practice of strategic planning, supply and provision
. To form a system of civil control over the entire field of national defense, with the use of powers of the executive, legislative and municipal authorities, corporate military ethics, as well as civil society institutions
. Change attitudes towards the national information sphere towards the formation of its unambiguous patrioticity
. To form a system for the preparation of national elites and serving a layer of Russia since childhood, on the basis of cadet education institutions
. Strengthen attention to the work of the CSTO and SCO
. Strengthen the attention of the state to the military aspect of the fundamental and applied sciences of all profiles and directions, as well as to the most military science, for there is nothing more useful in the world than a good theory
. Develop a system of criteria and indicators of the state of all spheres of the country's vital activity, as the foundations of evaluating the effectiveness of the state, a clear understanding of the orientation and course of national development, as well as to determine the state of the state in the "War-Peace" paradigm
. Develop new approaches, criteria and government practices to the system of mobilization of the economy and society
. Create a system of mandatory courses and on the training of the management of the state and the army the basics of the general theory of war and government management
. Curl cleaning
. Clearly define the personal responsibility of each official for the quality and consequences of the decisions made, as well as ensure the publicity of its offensive
In the Ministry of Defense
. Recreate GS GS in full its structures, powers, personnel composition and opportunities
. Create a command of special operations
. Create a structure on military vocational education, information and military science
. Create a Center for Strategic and Sociological Analysis
. Create the Institute for Preparation (Retraining) of the Teaching and Comptees of Institutions of Military Vocational Education
. In combat and operational training of headquarters and troops include a new mandatory element "Independent preparation"
. Recreate the infrastructure of military culture in garrisons and parts
. Develop and implement the state ideology of military service
. Develop and implement a new provision on the passage of the service of the officer's composition, introduce, including a new understanding of the category "Service in stock"
. Introduce army aircraft to land forces and strategic groups
. In each strategic direction, create 1-2 of the combined army and general-military divisions, including in each needed number of troops, forces and funds, as the overall basis of the groups of troops, and so on

Obviously, we have, that is, the Russian expert community has answers to almost most of the issues of our state and military construction, such proposals may be much, and they can come from any edge of Russia.
We believe that it is necessary to establish their accounting, and to ensure attentive consideration of all proposals, including with personal work with their authors, with the subsequent publication and discussion, as well as create mechanisms for their implementation and implementation.
It is important to realize that it is necessary to listen to everyone who has something to say, to offer, and who wants to help their homeland.
That is why the Institute for Independent Expertise is so vital, the only capable of appreciation is correct and appreciated as the quality of each idea or project, as well as their aggregate.
***
We believe that there is a danger that the new Minister of Defense and his team will take place primarily by the burning problems of technical re-equipment of the social security of the army, and may miss issues of education and professional military education in Russia, the issues of the genetic foundations of the army, that is, horseyology, moral spirit and ethics.
If it is so, then we will never endure the army (troops) from the market, and no trillions of money will make our army combat and successful.
***
I especially want to emphasize the need for a wide (and well-paid) use of the experience of officers and generals of the Soviet military school.
***
We are convinced that in addition to all the necessary and emergency actions, the Supreme Commander, the Minister of Defense and the General Staff must conduct a series of strategic maneuvers and games, with the involvement of the entire government of Russia, the regional authorities, so that each minister and official will understand their plot , duties, role and responsibility in preparing and conducting war.
The result of these strategic teachings and games should be the development of a country defense plan, which is historically never been developed in Russia, since the Ministry of Defense accounted for the use of the types of armed forces, and that always led to the fact that no one knew what to do with the beginning of the war Where to run, we carried unjustified losses, and then won the "one victorious jerk of our innumerable forces."
Obviously, it is impossible to repeat it once if there is no time or forces.

Dear Colleagues!
We are always open and ready to work on the removal of Russia and its army from the crisis.
We know what to do, we can work, and we expect the homeland and the army to demand our knowledge and opportunities.

Thank you for attention.

Vladimirov Alexander Ivanovich

Major General retired.

Born on April 17, 1945 in the family of the serviceman. Site, in many generations, officer. Russian. Education: Moscow Suvorov Military School (1963);

Moscow Higher Officer Command School - Diploma with honors and a gold medal (1966);

Military Academy. M.V. Frunze - a diploma with honors (1977);

Military Academy of General Staff Sun of the USSR - Diploma with honors (1984). Specialty - Higher operational and strategic management. Candidate of political sciences. He served in the Far East, in HSVG, in Belarus, Vietnam. During the service in the ranks of the Armed Forces of the USSR

all team and staffing posts from the commander of the motorized rifle platoon, to the head of the headquarters - the first deputy commander of the Communist Party Army, was constantly serving in combat deployed parts. For outstanding progress in the service:

Twice received the next military ranks ahead of schedule: the title of "Captain" and the captain's epaulets were awarded to Alexander Vladimirov personally by the Minister of Defense for the skillful command of the motorized rifle company and the excellent results shown in regular exercises with combat shooting, at the landfill, immediately after the end of the exercises; The title "Lieutenant Colonel" was assigned to Major Alexander Vladimirov at an excellent end of the military academy. V. V. Frunze in 1977 and appointment to the post of commander 411 motorized rifle shelf 5 OA DVO;

In 1979, for success in combat and political training, the initiative and skillful command of the 411mothelial regiment of the 5th Army Army, DVOs during the strategic maneuvers "East-79", was awarded the Order "For the service of the motherland in the ranks of the USSR SEC" III.;

In 1985, at the end of the year 35, the motorized rifle division of the 20 General Army of the HSVG, whom he commanded was recognized as the best in the USSR and division Sun and Division, awarded the Red Banner of the Glavaxe of the Ground Forces of the USSR Sun;

In 1988, according to the results of strategic exercises, "Autumn - 88" 28 The international army of the BVA and its headquarters of the army, the order of the Minister of Defense, were recognized as the best in the USSR Armed Forces. Awarded many state, departmental and foreign awards. He worked: Assistant Minister of Defense of the USSR on military reform issues; Military adviser to the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation; Head of the Department for Analysis of the Problems of the Armed Forces and MPC of the Analytical Department of the President of the Russian Federation; Advisor to the International Fund for Economic and Social Reforms (Fund "Reform"); General director of the publishing house "Military parade"; Senior Researcher of the Institute of the United States and Canada RAS.

Participated in the development of the "Fundamentals of the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation", the laws of the Russian Federation "On Defense", "On Security", "On the status of military personnel", "On conversion", "On Veterans", "On Education", Messages of the Russian Federation Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation National Security, National Security Concept of the Russian Federation, the "Fundamentals of the National Security and Development Strategy of Russia 2050".

Author of more than 130 works and publications on the problems of the national state idea, military reform, the reform of the Armed Forces, civil control over the power structures of the state, on the problems of international, regional and national security, the national strategy, on state-building and management.

He directs the cadet movement in Moscow and Russia, heads the struggle for the salvation of the National Suvorov Military School, is working on the creation of a cadet education system in Russia; It leads an active journalistic, patriotic educational and scientific work, works on the fundamental work of the "Fundamentals of the General Theory of War". Married, has four children and three grandchildren.

Major General Alexander Ivanovich Vladimirov is the first officer of the Soviet Army, which:

in 1986, being another commander of the 35th motorized railway division of the 20 General Army of HSVG, formulated general approaches and specific areas of military reform in the USSR; Contrary to the desire of the Minister of Defense of the USSR Marshal D. T. Yazov, I achieved their publication in the journal "Military Thought" No. 10 of 1988, in the article "Reflections of the Communist Party Commander" and the All-Armess Discussion of His ideas in the USSR; Then, its basic ideas of military reform were published in the book "Army and Society" of 1990; For that in 1990, from the post of headquarters, the first deputy commander of 28 OA Bvo, was sent "for amendments to the Spirit" in Vietnam, where during the year he successfully commanded the group of Soviet military advisers and grouping of national troops in one of the neighboring countries. After arriving from Vietnam in the spring of 1991 and his personal conversation with the Minister of Defense of the USSR Marshal D. T. Yazov, in July of the same year he was fired from the rows of the USSR Sun without declaring reasons. After the coup, Major General Alexander Vladimirov was restored to the army and held the post of Assistant Minister of Defense of the USSR (Marshal Aviation E. I. Shaposhnikov) in military reform. At the end of 1991, he made a report and the initiative of the reform of the USSR Armed Forces, implementing their ideas through the creation of a new military organization of the country, as the strategic basis of the United Armed Forces of the Commonwealth of Independent States (by the Type of NATO), for which in 1992 at the age of 4, was Fired from the CIS Sun (!) for illness. In 1993, he personally presented his report to the first president of Russia B. N. Yeltsin's report "Fundamentals of the Russian Federation of the Russian Federation", which was highly appreciated by the President of Russia after which he adopted A. I. Vladimirov to his administration. Attempts to reform the Armed Forces of Russia from the height of the Presidential Administration of Russia, in which A. I.Vladimirov worked as the head of the department for the armed forces and military-industrial complex of analytical management and a member of the Expert Council under the President of the Russian Federation, did not lead to positive results, in the late 90s he He was dismissed "to reduce states", but then, until 2006, he worked as advisor to the Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation.

Today, Alexander Ivanovich Vladimirov - President of the College of Experts of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Political Sciences, Honorary Chairman of the Open Commonwealth of Suvorovtsev, Nakhimovtsev and Cadet of Russia.